Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial
DETECT
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare visual acuity outcomes of two types of endothelial keratoplasty: 1) Ultrathin Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) or 2) Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). Half of the participants will be randomized to have DSAEK and the other half will have DMEK.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jan 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_4
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 4, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2023
CompletedNovember 25, 2020
November 1, 2020
3.2 years
January 27, 2015
March 26, 2019
November 19, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual Acuity
The BSCVA was recorded at 4 meters by a masked refractionist certified for the study using a protocol adapted from the Age-Related Eye Disease Study using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts: chart R(2110), chart 1(2111), and chart 2(2112) (Precision Vision, Woodstock, IL).
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual Acuity
3 and 12 months
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual Acuity
24 Months
Endothelial Cell Count
3, 6, 12 months
Endothelial Cell Count
24 months
Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations
3, 6, 12 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Refraction
3, 6, 12, 24 months
Graft Thickness
3, 6, 12, 24 months
Operative Times
Baseline
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
DSAEK
OTHERType of corneal transplant; Tissue grafts will be cut to the right thickness using a microkeratome prepared at the eye bank per standard eye bank protocol (about 60-90 microns thick). A 4 mm corneal incision will be used, with Endoserter as the means of inserting the graft, an FDA approved device for this purpose.
DMEK
OTHERType of corneal transplant; Endothelial grafts will be pre-peeled at the eyebank (70%). In the operating room the remaining 30% will be peeled, and the endothelium will be stained with trypan blue. A 3.5 mm corneal incision will be used and the graft will be inserted with a modified jones tube injector. The tap technique will be used to position the graft.
Interventions
The Endoserter, a corneal endothelium device, is an approved FDA device. This will be used to insert and position the graft into the anterior chamber during endothelial replacement surgery. It is a sterile, single-use instrument.
Prednisolone is a corticosteroid used to alleviate swelling post-surgery.
Ofloxacin is an antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections of the eye.
Tropicamide is a prescription drug used to dilate pupils during an eye exam.
Phenylephrine is a prescription drug used to dilate pupils during an eye exam.
The Jones Tube will be used to insert the graft into a 3.5 mm corneal incision during endothelial replacement surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Damaged or diseased endothelium from Fuchs or Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy
- Good candidates for corneal transplantation for either DMEK or DSAEK
- Willingness and ability to undergo a cornea transplantation
- Willingness to participate in follow-up visits
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who are decisionally and/or cognitively impaired
- Participants who are not suitable for the DMEK or DSAEK surgeries
- Prior Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) or any other ophthalmic surgery except uncomplicated cataract surgery
- Indication for surgery that is not suitable for EK (e.g. keratoconus, stromal dystrophies and scars)
- Presence of a condition that increases the probability for failure (e.g., heavily vascularized cornea, uncontrolled uveitis)
- Other primary endothelial dysfunction conditions including posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy and congenital hereditary corneal dystrophy
- Aphakia, or anterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) in study eye prior to or anticipated during EK
- Planned intraocular lens exchange of an anterior chamber IOL with a posterior chamber IOL in study at time of study EK
- Pre-operative central sub-epithelial or stromal scarring that the investigator believes is visually significant and could impact post-operative stromal clarity assessment
- Peripheral anterior synechiae (iris to angle) in the angle greater than a total of three clock hours
- Hypotony (Intraocular pressure \<10mmHg)
- Uncontrolled (defined as intraocular pressure \>25mmHg) glaucoma Visually significant optic nerve or macular pathology
- Visually significant optic nerve or macular pathology
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oregon Health and Science Universitylead
- University of California, San Franciscocollaborator
- Stanford Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94303, United States
F. I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Related Publications (10)
Price FW Jr, Price MO. Evolution of endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2013 Nov;32 Suppl 1:S28-32. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a0a307.
PMID: 24104929BACKGROUNDChen ES, Terry MA, Shamie N, Hoar KL, Friend DJ. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: six-month results in a prospective study of 100 eyes. Cornea. 2008 Jun;27(5):514-20. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181611c50.
PMID: 18520497BACKGROUNDHam L, Dapena I, van Luijk C, van der Wees J, Melles GR. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases. Eye (Lond). 2009 Oct;23(10):1990-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.393. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
PMID: 19182768BACKGROUNDDirisamer M, van Dijk K, Dapena I, Ham L, Oganes O, Frank LE, Melles GR. Prevention and management of graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;130(3):280-91. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.343. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
PMID: 22084160BACKGROUNDKruse FE, Laaser K, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Riss S, Bachmann BO. A stepwise approach to donor preparation and insertion increases safety and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011 May;30(5):580-7. doi: 10.1097/ico.0b013e3182000e2e.
PMID: 21598430BACKGROUNDRudolph M, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Epstein D, Kruse FE. Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012 Mar;119(3):528-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.034. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
PMID: 22197439BACKGROUNDBusin M, Madi S, Santorum P, Scorcia V, Beltz J. Ultrathin descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2013 Jun;120(6):1186-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.030. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
PMID: 23466268BACKGROUNDGuerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Giebel AW, Price FW. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011 Dec;118(12):2368-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
PMID: 21872938BACKGROUNDAng MJ, Chamberlain W, Lin CC, Pickel J, Austin A, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Effect of Unilateral Endothelial Keratoplasty on Vision-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes in the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial (DETECT): A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):747-754. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0877.
PMID: 31046075DERIVEDChamberlain W, Lin CC, Austin A, Schubach N, Clover J, McLeod SD, Porco TC, Lietman TM, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial: A Randomized Trial Comparing Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jan;126(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
PMID: 29945801DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer
- Organization
- Kaiser Permanente / University of California, San Francisco
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Winston Chamberlain, MD, PhD
Oregon Health and Science University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer, MD
University of California, San Francisco
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles Lin, MD
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ophthalmologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2015
First Posted
February 26, 2015
Study Start
January 22, 2015
Primary Completion
April 4, 2018
Study Completion
May 30, 2023
Last Updated
November 25, 2020
Results First Posted
July 2, 2019
Record last verified: 2020-11