Phenylephrine vs. Norepinephrine Infusion After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
1 other identifier
interventional
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine if a medication called phenylephrine, which helps to control blood pressure, is more effective as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion compared to continuous IV norepinephrine in maintaining blood pressure during a spinal anesthetic for a cesarean delivery. Good blood pressure control has been shown to decrease nausea and vomiting during and after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. For elective cesarean delivery, all participants will receive spinal anesthesia with a local anesthetic and morphine (provides long term pain control after cesarean delivery). This study plans to enroll 80 pregnant research subjects 18 years and above. Patients will be randomly assigned according to a computer generated system to be in one of two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Aug 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 4, 2017
CompletedJanuary 4, 2017
January 1, 2017
1 year
January 20, 2015
April 26, 2016
January 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of Rescue Boluses to Maintain SBP
Number of rescue boluses to maintain the SBP within 100-120% of baseline
At time of surgery, up to 2 hours
Median Total Rescue Bolus Dose of Ephedrine (mg) to Maintain SBP
At time of surgery, up to 2 hours
Median Total Rescue Bolus Dose of Phenylephrine (mcg) to Maintain SBP
At time of surgery, up to 2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Both Nausea and Emesis
At time of surgery, up to 2 hours
Study Arms (2)
Phenylephrine
EXPERIMENTALA continuous phenylephrine infusion at 0.1 mcg/kg/min
Norepinephrine
EXPERIMENTALA continuous norepinephrine infusion at 0.05 mcg/kg/min
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification 1 and 2
- Pregnant women with singleton pregnancy
- Gestational age greater than 36 weeks
- Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Use of cardiac medication or medication for blood pressure control
- Cardiovascular disease
- Multiple gestation
- Gestation diabetes requiring insulin
- History of postoperative nausea and vomiting
- Refusal to be in study
- Gastric bypass surgery
- History of chronic opioid use (chronic pain syndrome)
- Emergent caesarean delivery for maternal and/or fetal distress
- Eclampsia
- Progressive neurologic disease
- Infection at insertion site
- Allergy to local anesthetics, narcotics or other study medications.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
West Virginia University Hospital
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506, United States
Related Publications (9)
Afolabi BB, Lesi FE. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3.
PMID: 23076903BACKGROUNDDjabatey EA, Barclay PM. Difficult and failed intubation in 3430 obstetric general anaesthetics. Anaesthesia. 2009 Nov;64(11):1168-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06060.x.
PMID: 19825049BACKGROUNDOhpasanon P, Chinachoti T, Sriswasdi P, Srichu S. Prospective study of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section at Siriraj Hospital: incidence and risk factors, Part 2. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 May;91(5):675-80.
PMID: 18672631BACKGROUNDLin FQ, Qiu MT, Ding XX, Fu SK, Li Q. Ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: an updated meta-analysis. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012 Jul;18(7):591-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00345.x.
PMID: 22759268BACKGROUNDLee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T. A quantitative, systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2002 Apr;94(4):920-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200204000-00028.
PMID: 11916798BACKGROUNDStewart A, Fernando R, McDonald S, Hignett R, Jones T, Columb M. The dose-dependent effects of phenylephrine for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1230-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f2eae1. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
PMID: 20841418BACKGROUNDAllen TK, George RB, White WD, Muir HA, Habib AS. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of four fixed rate infusion regimens of phenylephrine for hemodynamic support during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1221-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e1db21. Epub 2010 May 21.
PMID: 20495139BACKGROUNDNgan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF. Comparison of phenylephrine infusion regimens for maintaining maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Apr;92(4):469-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh088. Epub 2004 Feb 20.
PMID: 14977792BACKGROUNDDoherty A, Ohashi Y, Downey K, Carvalho JC. Phenylephrine infusion versus bolus regimens during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a double-blind randomized clinical trial to assess hemodynamic changes. Anesth Analg. 2012 Dec;115(6):1343-50. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826ac3db. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
PMID: 23011562BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
38 subjects were enrolled in the phenylephrine group and none excluded. 47 subjects were enrolled in the norepinephrine group; 4 patients excluded (2 patients due to monitoring equipment failure, and 2 patients due to emergency cesarean deliveries).
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Manuel C. Vallejo, Chair of Department of Anesthesiology
- Organization
- West Virginia University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chair; Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2015
First Posted
February 3, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 4, 2017
Results First Posted
January 4, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01