Computerized Alcohol Misuse Intervention System for Health Care
CAMI
Micro-targeted Computerized Alcohol Misuse Intervention System for Health Care
2 other identifiers
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project expands upon the proof-of-concept work done under the pilot project in order to get Interventionaire© poised for more widespread use. Interventionaire© is designed to deploy a computerized interactive questionnaire to patients in a physician waiting room. The information gathered is intended to be a conversation starter for primary care providers and patients (who may feel more at ease with the computer in revealing health risk behaviors, like alcohol abuse). Widespread use of Interventionaire© could result in a substantial cost savings by delivering a wide reaching and highly acceptable prevention strategy for integrating risky health behavior screening and brief intervention into mainstream medical practice.The investigators overall hypothesis is that participants receiving the computerized intervention will have greater improvement than those receiving the attention control condition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 17, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 17, 2017
CompletedMay 10, 2017
May 1, 2017
6 months
February 1, 2015
May 8, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in drinking behavior as measured by self-reported alcohol use after completing the computerized alcohol misuse intervention (CAMI)
At one month, the investigators expect the attention control group (A) to reduce their alcohol use somewhat, but the intervention group (B) is expected to show a much steeper reduction. Thus, the investigators first planned contrast tests A vs. B, and can be considered similar to a parallel group trial examining 1-month outcomes for intervention vs. attention control. After the cross-over at 1 month, the magnitude of the reduction from Month 1 to Month 2 for those receiving the intervention (C) is expected to be similar to that experienced by those who received the intervention initially.
Month 1 and Month 2
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Changes in participant motivation to stop or cut down alcohol use as measured by self-reported interest in reduction of alcohol use after completing the computerized alcohol misuse intervention (CAMI)
Month 1 and Month 2
Study Arms (2)
Computerized Alcohol Misuse Intervention
EXPERIMENTALArm 1 is a cross-over randomized controlled trial (XRCT) comparing the short-term effects of the computerized alcohol misuse intervention (CAMI) vs. a generic health education attention-control (AC) condition in reducing past 30 day: (a) days of alcohol use, (b) days of heavy episodic drinking, (c) typical number of drinks consumed on a day of drinking, and (d) alcohol use in dangerous situations; (2) investigate changes in (a) patient motivation and (b) perceived norms as mediators of intervention effectiveness.
Attention Control (AC)
PLACEBO COMPARATORArm 2 is not an active intervention but an attention control condition - it is not expected to exert any real intervention effect. Hence, any observed effects for the AC condition can be attributed to natural change via regression-to-the-mean, assessment reactivity, or a placebo effect. The effect size estimate of the intervention, both from an efficacy standpoint (i.e., above and beyond what change would have normally occurred) and an effectiveness standpoint (i.e., the magnitude of behavior change that can be expected in real-world implementation), can be readily calculated.
Interventions
Interventionaire© is a computerized alcohol misuse intervention that includes a normative feedback component unique in its micro-targeting of alcohol use feedback based on participant demographic characteristics (race/ethnicity, gender, and age), drawing population normative data from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. This represents a novel use of epidemiological data to inform clinical services.
These products are designed for entertainment and educational purposes only. No medical claims are made for them and, the participant's interaction with them should be conceptually unrelated to alcohol use behavior.In order to avoid any carryover effect from comparing two active treatments, we have chosen to use a simple attention control condition that is not expected to exert any real intervention effect. In that way, the effect size estimate of the intervention can be readily calculated. No research data will be collected as part of the AC, beyond the amount of time spent on the program.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult age 18 and older;
- Positive AUDIT screening score; and
- Willing to provide contact information for themselves and two friends or family members (to assist with tracking for follow-up).
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to give informed consent (e.g., due to cognitive impairment);
- Acute medical or psychiatric problem that precludes ability to complete the study interview or intervention;
- Inability to comprehend or read English.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Family Health Centers of Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21225, United States
Related Publications (1)
Neighbors C, Larimer ME, Lewis MA. Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Jun;72(3):434-47. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.434.
PMID: 15279527BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Diana H Caldwell, PhD
Research Circle Associates
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arti P Varanasi, PhD, MPH
Advancing Synergy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- President
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2015
First Posted
February 23, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 17, 2017
Study Completion
April 17, 2017
Last Updated
May 10, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share