NCT04971031

Brief Summary

A Multi-Center Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Design, Vehicle-Controlled Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 0.25% Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Vehicle in Subjects with Dry Eye Disease

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
158

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2021

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 12, 2021

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 8, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 8, 2021

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 24, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

July 12, 2021

Results QC Date

February 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 10, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Conjunctival Redness Assessed Via Digital Photography Over 90 Minutes in the Dry Eye Chamber

    Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for conjunctival redness on a 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = normal, 4 = prominent), where a high score means a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measure for change from baseline included baseline, treatment group, and nominal time point as fixed effects.

    The efficacy assessment period was assessed during the 90-minute dry eye chamber at Day 2; baseline was Pre-Dose #1 at Day 1.

  • Subject-reported Ocular Dryness Score (0 - 100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))

    Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for subject-reported ocular dryness score VAS (0 = no discomfort, 100 = maximal discomfort), where a high score means a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measure for change from baseline included baseline, treatment group, and nominal time point as fixed effects.

    The efficacy assessment period was assessed during the 90-minute dry eye chamber at Day 2; baseline was Pre-Dose #1 at Day 1.

  • Schirmer Test Change From Baseline After the First Dose on Day 1

    Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for Schirmer test on a millimeter line (0 = none, 35 = maximum), where a shorter length indicates a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measure for change from baseline included baseline and treatment group as fixed effects.

    The efficacy assessment period was before and after the final dose on Day 1; baseline was Pre-Dose #1 at Day 1.

Study Arms (2)

Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) administered 7 times over two consecutive days.

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)

Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days.

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution

Interventions

Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) administered 7 times over two consecutive days.

Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) administered 7 times over two consecutive days.

Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days.

Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age (either gender and any race);
  • Reported history of dry eye for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1;
  • Reported history of use or desire to use eye drops for dry eye symptoms within 6 months of Visit 1.

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinically significant slit lamp findings at Visit 1 that may include active blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), lid margin inflammation, or active ocular allergies that require therapeutic treatment, and/or in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with study parameters;
  • Diagnosis of an ongoing ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal), or active ocular inflammation at Visit 1;
  • Contact lens use within 7 days of Visit 1 or anticipate using contact lenses during the trial;
  • Eye drop use within 2 hours of Visit 1;
  • Previous laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery within the last 12 months;
  • Cyclosporine 0.05% or 0.09% or lifitegrast 5.0% ophthalmic solution use within 90 days of Visit 1;
  • Be receiving systemic corticosteroid therapy (not including inhaled corticosteroids) within 14 days of Visit 1 or anticipate such therapy throughout the study period;
  • Planned ocular and/or lid surgeries over the study period or any ocular surgery within 6 months of Visit 1;
  • Temporary punctal plugs during the study that have not been stable within 30 days of Visit 1.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Andover Eye Associates

Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sr. Director, Clinical Operations
Organization
Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2021

First Posted

July 21, 2021

Study Start

June 15, 2021

Primary Completion

September 8, 2021

Study Completion

September 8, 2021

Last Updated

February 24, 2025

Results First Posted

March 1, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations