The Challenge of Obtaining Qualitative Bacterial Cultures in Non-expectorating Cystic Fibrosis Patients
1 other identifier
observational
175
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Accurate identification of lower respiratory tract pathogens is standard of care in the management of CF patients and it is therefore recommended to perform regular bacterial cultures, at least once a year, but some even recommend monthly cultures. This can be done through different methods, of which sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) are the gold standard. However, BAL is an invasive method, not designated to repeat monthly. Therefore, the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections can be challenging in the non-expectorating CF patient. Other methods, such as induced sputum (IS), cough swabs and nasal swabs, have been developed to obtain bacterial cultures in these patients. Studies have investigated the reliability of these different sampling methods, however, with controversial conclusions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 4, 2016
October 1, 2016
1.6 years
January 30, 2015
October 2, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted value
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted value of different sampling methods
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Preference of method
Questionnaire: day of sampling, Analysis: 2 years
Pain experienced with any method
Questionnaire: day of sampling, Analysis: 2 years
Study Arms (3)
Expectorating CF patients
(=able to expectorate sputum spontaneously) 1. Nasal swab 2. Cough swab 3. Spontaneous expectorated sputum 4. Questionnaire
Non-expectorating CF patients
(=unable to expectorate sputum spontaneously) 1. Nasal swab 2. Cough swab 3. Induced sputum after inhalation of hypertonic saline (NaCl 6%) 4. Questionnaire
Bronchoscopy CF patients
(=undergoing clinically indicated bronchoscopy) 1. Nasal swab 2. Cough swab 3. Induced sputum after inhalation of hypertonic saline (NaCl 6%) 4. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)
Interventions
Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in: * Expectorating CF patients * Non-expectorating CF patients * Bronchoscopy CF patients
Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in: * Expectorating CF patients * Non-expectorating CF patients * Bronchoscopy CF patients
Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in: \- Expectorating CF patients
Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in: * Non-expectorating CF patients * Bronchoscopy CF patients
Will be obtained by the pulmonologist in: \- Bronchoscopy CF patients
Completing questionnaire on acceptability of different sampling methods by patients \>6 years of age
Eligibility Criteria
CF patients
You may qualify if:
- Both expectorating and non-expectorating CF patients with confirmed diagnosis (sweat test / genotyping)
- All ages
- Attending the UZ Brussel CF Clinic
- Written informed consent from each participant and/or his parents or legal guardian
You may not qualify if:
- CF patients who underwent lung transplantation
- Denial of participation to the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anne Malfroot, MD, PhD
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Cystic Fibrosis Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physiotherapist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2015
First Posted
February 16, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All data will be analysed and shared as an original article, individual data will only be available upon motivated request