NCT02363764

Brief Summary

Accurate identification of lower respiratory tract pathogens is standard of care in the management of CF patients and it is therefore recommended to perform regular bacterial cultures, at least once a year, but some even recommend monthly cultures. This can be done through different methods, of which sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) are the gold standard. However, BAL is an invasive method, not designated to repeat monthly. Therefore, the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections can be challenging in the non-expectorating CF patient. Other methods, such as induced sputum (IS), cough swabs and nasal swabs, have been developed to obtain bacterial cultures in these patients. Studies have investigated the reliability of these different sampling methods, however, with controversial conclusions.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
175

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 30, 2015

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 16, 2015

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

October 4, 2016

Status Verified

October 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

January 30, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 2, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

respiratory sampling

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted value

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted value of different sampling methods

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Preference of method

    Questionnaire: day of sampling, Analysis: 2 years

  • Pain experienced with any method

    Questionnaire: day of sampling, Analysis: 2 years

Study Arms (3)

Expectorating CF patients

(=able to expectorate sputum spontaneously) 1. Nasal swab 2. Cough swab 3. Spontaneous expectorated sputum 4. Questionnaire

Procedure: Nasal swabProcedure: Cough swabProcedure: Spontaneous expectorated sputumOther: Questionnaire

Non-expectorating CF patients

(=unable to expectorate sputum spontaneously) 1. Nasal swab 2. Cough swab 3. Induced sputum after inhalation of hypertonic saline (NaCl 6%) 4. Questionnaire

Procedure: Nasal swabProcedure: Cough swabProcedure: Induced sputumOther: Questionnaire

Bronchoscopy CF patients

(=undergoing clinically indicated bronchoscopy) 1. Nasal swab 2. Cough swab 3. Induced sputum after inhalation of hypertonic saline (NaCl 6%) 4. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)

Procedure: Nasal swabProcedure: Cough swabProcedure: Induced sputumProcedure: Bronchoalveolar lavage

Interventions

Nasal swabPROCEDURE

Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in: * Expectorating CF patients * Non-expectorating CF patients * Bronchoscopy CF patients

Bronchoscopy CF patientsExpectorating CF patientsNon-expectorating CF patients
Cough swabPROCEDURE

Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in: * Expectorating CF patients * Non-expectorating CF patients * Bronchoscopy CF patients

Bronchoscopy CF patientsExpectorating CF patientsNon-expectorating CF patients

Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in: \- Expectorating CF patients

Expectorating CF patients

Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in: * Non-expectorating CF patients * Bronchoscopy CF patients

Bronchoscopy CF patientsNon-expectorating CF patients

Will be obtained by the pulmonologist in: \- Bronchoscopy CF patients

Bronchoscopy CF patients

Completing questionnaire on acceptability of different sampling methods by patients \>6 years of age

Expectorating CF patientsNon-expectorating CF patients

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

CF patients

You may qualify if:

  • Both expectorating and non-expectorating CF patients with confirmed diagnosis (sweat test / genotyping)
  • All ages
  • Attending the UZ Brussel CF Clinic
  • Written informed consent from each participant and/or his parents or legal guardian

You may not qualify if:

  • CF patients who underwent lung transplantation
  • Denial of participation to the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis

Interventions

Bronchoalveolar LavageSurveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pancreatic DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesInfant, Newborn, Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutic IrrigationInvestigative TechniquesData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Anne Malfroot, MD, PhD

    Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Cystic Fibrosis Clinic

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Physiotherapist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2015

First Posted

February 16, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

August 1, 2016

Study Completion

October 1, 2016

Last Updated

October 4, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

All data will be analysed and shared as an original article, individual data will only be available upon motivated request