APOS Therapy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized Controlled Trial BIOTOK
BIOTOK
Biomechanical Therapy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized Controlled Trial(BIOTOK)
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Painful knee osteoarthritis is common and treatments, short of knee replacement, are limited. The investigators plan to test the efficacy of a novel promising device for treatment of knee osteoarthritis affecting the inner part of the knee, the most common location. There are no disease modifying treatments available and therefore there is an emphasis on conservative management techniques to benefit individuals. Many of these treatments (insoles, braces, physiotherapy etc) have been shown to have relative success in individuals but a new novel device is demonstrating better effectiveness in this patient group. APOS (All Phases of Step) therapy consists of a shoe oriented system of care that works by shifting the load across parts of the knee and retraining the lower extremity muscles. Preliminary data suggest impressive favourable reductions in knee pain and a commensurate decrease in knee loading during walking. However, APOS treatment has never been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial even though it is widely used. The investigators propose to conduct a randomised blinded controlled trial of APOS treatment among persons with painful knee osteoarthritis affecting the inside (medial or lateral) of their knees. The investigators will focus on pain outcomes and quality of life. APOS has committed to provide the shoe system and a matched sham device, that they have developed, and will also provide the technicians trained to calibrate the pertupods (balls under the sole of the foot) on the shoe without charge. The research will be undertaken in a University setting for the gait evaluations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2017
CompletedNovember 13, 2019
November 1, 2019
2.3 years
January 29, 2015
November 11, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
WOMAC pain subscale
End of treatment (at 24 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
WOMAC pain subscale
At week 4, 8, 12 and 16
WOMAC stiffness subscale
At baseline, at week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
WOMAC disability subscale
At baseline, at week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Total WOMAC score
At baseline, at week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Overall assessment of disease status on a 7 point likert scale
At baseline, at week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
APOS
EXPERIMENTALAPOS(All Phase Of Step)-shoe
Sham APOS
SHAM COMPARATORSham APOS(All Phase Of Step)-shoe
Interventions
It consists of two shoes each with two large convex rubber balls called "Pertupods" screwed into the plantar surface of the sole so that a person walks on these balls.
It has the same appearance as the APOS shoe, but without the rubber ball attachment on the plantar surface.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or non-pregnant women
- Aged \>= 40
- Outpatient setting
- ACR clinical criteria for OA of the knee
- Radiologically confirmed symptomatic uni- or bilateral OA of the knee for at least 6 months
- Radiological criteria: X-rays showing tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis defined as at least Kellgren and Lawrence Grade 2
- At least moderate pain on the WOMAC pain scale (\>3 on a standardized scale range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 10)
- Must understand German
- Informed Consent documented by participant signature
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women
- Aged \< 40
- History of an inflammatory rheumatic disease
- Non-knee musculoskeletal pain as or more severe than the knee pain
- Glucocorticoid injections in the knees in the previous three month
- Previous osteotomy
- Unilateral hemiprosthesis
- Unilateral total joint replacement
- Being treated for cancer
- Participation in another clinical trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bernlead
- Mäxi Foundationcollaborator
- University of Berncollaborator
- Apos Medical and Sports Technology Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Berne
Bern, 3011, Switzerland
Related Publications (12)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults--United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 1;58(16):421-6.
PMID: 19407734BACKGROUNDBadley EM, Wang PP. Arthritis and the aging population: projections of arthritis prevalence in Canada 1991 to 2031. J Rheumatol. 1998 Jan;25(1):138-44.
PMID: 9458217BACKGROUNDRosemann T, Grol R, Herman K, Wensing M, Szecsenyi J. Association between obesity, quality of life, physical activity and health service utilization in primary care patients with osteoarthritis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Jan 28;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-4.
PMID: 18226211BACKGROUNDGrotle M, Hagen KB, Natvig B, Dahl FA, Kvien TK. Prevalence and burden of osteoarthritis: results from a population survey in Norway. J Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;35(4):677-84. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
PMID: 18278832BACKGROUNDJuni P, Reichenbach S, Dieppe P. Osteoarthritis: rational approach to treating the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Aug;20(4):721-40. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2006.05.002.
PMID: 16979535BACKGROUNDNiu J, Zhang YQ, Torner J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P, Sack B, Clancy M, Sharma L, Felson DT. Is obesity a risk factor for progressive radiographic knee osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar 15;61(3):329-35. doi: 10.1002/art.24337.
PMID: 19248122BACKGROUNDFelson DT, McLaughlin S, Goggins J, LaValley MP, Gale ME, Totterman S, Li W, Hill C, Gale D. Bone marrow edema and its relation to progression of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 1):330-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_1-200309020-00008.
PMID: 12965941BACKGROUNDBrouwer RW, Jakma TS, Verhagen AP, Verhaar JA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Braces and orthoses for treating osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD004020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004020.pub2.
PMID: 15674927BACKGROUNDElbaz A, Mor A, Segal G, Debbi E, Haim A, Halperin N, Debi R. APOS therapy improves clinical measurements and gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Nov;25(9):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.017. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
PMID: 20637534BACKGROUNDBar-Ziv Y, Beer Y, Ran Y, Benedict S, Halperin N. A treatment applying a biomechanical device to the feet of patients with knee osteoarthritis results in reduced pain and improved function: a prospective controlled study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Aug 10;11:179. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-179.
PMID: 20698991BACKGROUNDTrelle S, Reichenbach S, Wandel S, Hildebrand P, Tschannen B, Villiger PM, Egger M, Juni P. Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Jan 11;342:c7086. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c7086.
PMID: 21224324BACKGROUNDReichenbach S, Felson DT, Hincapie CA, Heldner S, Butikofer L, Lenz A, da Costa BR, Bonel HM, Jones RK, Hawker GA, Juni P. Effect of Biomechanical Footwear on Knee Pain in People With Knee Osteoarthritis: The BIOTOK Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1802-1812. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3565.
PMID: 32396180DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephan Reichenbach, PD Dr. med.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Peter Jüni, Prof.
Applied Health Research Centre (AHRC), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2015
First Posted
February 16, 2015
Study Start
April 20, 2015
Primary Completion
August 15, 2017
Study Completion
August 15, 2017
Last Updated
November 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11