NCT02363712

Brief Summary

Painful knee osteoarthritis is common and treatments, short of knee replacement, are limited. The investigators plan to test the efficacy of a novel promising device for treatment of knee osteoarthritis affecting the inner part of the knee, the most common location. There are no disease modifying treatments available and therefore there is an emphasis on conservative management techniques to benefit individuals. Many of these treatments (insoles, braces, physiotherapy etc) have been shown to have relative success in individuals but a new novel device is demonstrating better effectiveness in this patient group. APOS (All Phases of Step) therapy consists of a shoe oriented system of care that works by shifting the load across parts of the knee and retraining the lower extremity muscles. Preliminary data suggest impressive favourable reductions in knee pain and a commensurate decrease in knee loading during walking. However, APOS treatment has never been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial even though it is widely used. The investigators propose to conduct a randomised blinded controlled trial of APOS treatment among persons with painful knee osteoarthritis affecting the inside (medial or lateral) of their knees. The investigators will focus on pain outcomes and quality of life. APOS has committed to provide the shoe system and a matched sham device, that they have developed, and will also provide the technicians trained to calibrate the pertupods (balls under the sole of the foot) on the shoe without charge. The research will be undertaken in a University setting for the gait evaluations.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
220

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 29, 2015

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 16, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 20, 2015

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 15, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 15, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

November 13, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

January 29, 2015

Last Update Submit

November 11, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, kneetherapyshoeRandomized Controlled Trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • WOMAC pain subscale

    End of treatment (at 24 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • WOMAC pain subscale

    At week 4, 8, 12 and 16

  • WOMAC stiffness subscale

    At baseline, at week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24

  • WOMAC disability subscale

    At baseline, at week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24

  • Total WOMAC score

    At baseline, at week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24

  • Overall assessment of disease status on a 7 point likert scale

    At baseline, at week 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

APOS

EXPERIMENTAL

APOS(All Phase Of Step)-shoe

Device: APOS shoe

Sham APOS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham APOS(All Phase Of Step)-shoe

Device: Sham-APOS shoe

Interventions

APOS shoeDEVICE

It consists of two shoes each with two large convex rubber balls called "Pertupods" screwed into the plantar surface of the sole so that a person walks on these balls.

APOS

It has the same appearance as the APOS shoe, but without the rubber ball attachment on the plantar surface.

Sham APOS

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men or non-pregnant women
  • Aged \>= 40
  • Outpatient setting
  • ACR clinical criteria for OA of the knee
  • Radiologically confirmed symptomatic uni- or bilateral OA of the knee for at least 6 months
  • Radiological criteria: X-rays showing tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis defined as at least Kellgren and Lawrence Grade 2
  • At least moderate pain on the WOMAC pain scale (\>3 on a standardized scale range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 10)
  • Must understand German
  • Informed Consent documented by participant signature

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women
  • Aged \< 40
  • History of an inflammatory rheumatic disease
  • Non-knee musculoskeletal pain as or more severe than the knee pain
  • Glucocorticoid injections in the knees in the previous three month
  • Previous osteotomy
  • Unilateral hemiprosthesis
  • Unilateral total joint replacement
  • Being treated for cancer
  • Participation in another clinical trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Berne

Bern, 3011, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults--United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 1;58(16):421-6.

    PMID: 19407734BACKGROUND
  • Badley EM, Wang PP. Arthritis and the aging population: projections of arthritis prevalence in Canada 1991 to 2031. J Rheumatol. 1998 Jan;25(1):138-44.

    PMID: 9458217BACKGROUND
  • Rosemann T, Grol R, Herman K, Wensing M, Szecsenyi J. Association between obesity, quality of life, physical activity and health service utilization in primary care patients with osteoarthritis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Jan 28;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-4.

    PMID: 18226211BACKGROUND
  • Grotle M, Hagen KB, Natvig B, Dahl FA, Kvien TK. Prevalence and burden of osteoarthritis: results from a population survey in Norway. J Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;35(4):677-84. Epub 2008 Feb 15.

    PMID: 18278832BACKGROUND
  • Juni P, Reichenbach S, Dieppe P. Osteoarthritis: rational approach to treating the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Aug;20(4):721-40. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2006.05.002.

    PMID: 16979535BACKGROUND
  • Niu J, Zhang YQ, Torner J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P, Sack B, Clancy M, Sharma L, Felson DT. Is obesity a risk factor for progressive radiographic knee osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar 15;61(3):329-35. doi: 10.1002/art.24337.

    PMID: 19248122BACKGROUND
  • Felson DT, McLaughlin S, Goggins J, LaValley MP, Gale ME, Totterman S, Li W, Hill C, Gale D. Bone marrow edema and its relation to progression of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 1):330-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_1-200309020-00008.

    PMID: 12965941BACKGROUND
  • Brouwer RW, Jakma TS, Verhagen AP, Verhaar JA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Braces and orthoses for treating osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD004020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004020.pub2.

    PMID: 15674927BACKGROUND
  • Elbaz A, Mor A, Segal G, Debbi E, Haim A, Halperin N, Debi R. APOS therapy improves clinical measurements and gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Nov;25(9):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.017. Epub 2010 Jul 16.

    PMID: 20637534BACKGROUND
  • Bar-Ziv Y, Beer Y, Ran Y, Benedict S, Halperin N. A treatment applying a biomechanical device to the feet of patients with knee osteoarthritis results in reduced pain and improved function: a prospective controlled study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Aug 10;11:179. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-179.

    PMID: 20698991BACKGROUND
  • Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Wandel S, Hildebrand P, Tschannen B, Villiger PM, Egger M, Juni P. Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Jan 11;342:c7086. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c7086.

    PMID: 21224324BACKGROUND
  • Reichenbach S, Felson DT, Hincapie CA, Heldner S, Butikofer L, Lenz A, da Costa BR, Bonel HM, Jones RK, Hawker GA, Juni P. Effect of Biomechanical Footwear on Knee Pain in People With Knee Osteoarthritis: The BIOTOK Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1802-1812. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3565.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Stephan Reichenbach, PD Dr. med.

    Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Peter Jüni, Prof.

    Applied Health Research Centre (AHRC), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2015

First Posted

February 16, 2015

Study Start

April 20, 2015

Primary Completion

August 15, 2017

Study Completion

August 15, 2017

Last Updated

November 13, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Locations