Cognitive Remediation Therapy Within a Secure Forensic Setting
Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cognitive Remediation Within a Secure Forensic Setting for Schizophrenia Spectrum Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
65
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial tests the feasibility, effectiveness and patient satisfaction with cognitive remediation therapy for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder within a forensic hospital. It is hypothesised that patients receiving cognitive remediation therapy will have an improvement in cognitive performance, real world functioning, symptoms, violence risk and benefit more from additional psychosocial treatment programmes over time relative to patients receiving treatment as usual. Furthermore it is hypothesised that it will be feasible to carry out such a study and that patients will report high rates of satisfaction with cognitive remediation therapy. Finally it is hypothesised that differences on the effectiveness measures will be maintained at 6 month follow up after the end of treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable schizophrenia
Started Aug 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedJuly 25, 2017
July 1, 2017
2.4 years
February 4, 2015
July 24, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)
Consensus neuropsychological assessment battery for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia
Group by time interaction: changes from baseline, to end of treatment (average 5 months)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
Group by time interaction: changes from baseline, to end of treatment (average 5 months)
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (negative and disorganized factors)
Group by time interaction: changes from baseline, to end of treatment (average 5 months)
Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS)
Group by time interaction: changes from baseline, to end of treatment (average 5 months)
Other Outcomes (7)
Historical Clinical and Risk Management -20 (HCR-20)
Group by time interaction: changes from baseline, to 12 months
Dundrum Toolkit: Programme Completion and Recovery Scales
Group by time interaction: changes from baseline to 12 months
Patient satisfaction.
Average 5 months.
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cognitive Remediation Therapy
EXPERIMENTALPrinciple driven cognitive remediation therapy, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive training, cognitive enhancement.
Treatment as Usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual care.
Interventions
Fifty-six sessions of principle driven cognitive remediation therapy. Three individual sessions and one group session each week for approximately fourteen weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV (SCID) diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
You may not qualify if:
- Acutely psychotic, or judged too dangerous to participate in treatment, or being over 65 years of age.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Central Mental Hospital
Dublin, D 14, Ireland
Related Publications (10)
Nuechterlein KH, Green MF, Kern RS, Baade LE, Barch DM, Cohen JD, Essock S, Fenton WS, Frese FJ 3rd, Gold JM, Goldberg T, Heaton RK, Keefe RS, Kraemer H, Mesholam-Gately R, Seidman LJ, Stover E, Weinberger DR, Young AS, Zalcman S, Marder SR. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):203-13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010042. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
PMID: 18172019BACKGROUNDRybarczyk B. (2011). Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. p 2313
BACKGROUNDKay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261.
PMID: 3616518BACKGROUNDKring AM, Gur RE, Blanchard JJ, Horan WP, Reise SP. The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS): final development and validation. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;170(2):165-72. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010109.
PMID: 23377637BACKGROUNDWebster CD, Douglas KS, Eaves D, Hart SD. HCR-20: assessing risk for violence. Burnaby: Mental Health Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 1997.
BACKGROUNDDavoren M, Abidin Z, Naughton L, Gibbons O, Nulty A, Wright B, Kennedy HG. Prospective study of factors influencing conditional discharge from a forensic hospital: the DUNDRUM-3 programme completion and DUNDRUM-4 recovery structured professional judgement instruments and risk. BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Jul 9;13:185. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-185.
PMID: 23837697BACKGROUNDRose D, Wykes T, Farrier D, Doran AM, Sporel T & Bogner D (2008) What Do Clients Think of Cognitive Remediation Therapy?: A Consumer-Led Investigation of Satisfaction and Side Effects, American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 11:2, 181-204.
BACKGROUNDWykes T, Huddy V, Cellard C, McGurk SR, Czobor P. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 May;168(5):472-85. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060855. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
PMID: 21406461BACKGROUNDO'Reilly K, Donohoe G, O'Sullivan D, Coyle C, Corvin A, O'Flynn P, O'Donnell M, Galligan T, O'Connell P, Kennedy HG. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation for a national cohort of forensic patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 15;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2018-6.
PMID: 30646884DERIVEDO'Reilly K, Donohoe G, O'Sullivan D, Coyle C, Mullaney R, O'Connell P, Maddock C, Nulty A, O'Flynn P, O'Connell C, Kennedy HG. Study protocol: a randomised controlled trial of cognitive remediation for a national cohort of forensic mental health patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 13;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0707-y.
PMID: 26759167DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Professor Harry G Kennedy, M.D.
Central Mental Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin.
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Professor Gary Donohoe, Ph.D.
Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr. Ken W O'Reilly, D.Psych.Sc.
Central Mental Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr Ken O'Reilly. Senior Clinical Psychologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2015
First Posted
February 11, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 25, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07