A National Study of Intravenous Medication Errors
1 other identifier
observational
900
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To identify the key issues around use of computerized patient infusion devices (called "smart pumps"). To develop strategies that will improve the prevention of intravenous errors that will be broadly applicable. The investigators will conduct a national study using the general methodology developed by Husch et al. to allow a rapid assessment of the frequency and types of medication errors at an institution. The key questions the investigators will address are:
- 1.What are the frequency and types of intravenous medication errors?
- 2.How much variability is there by frequency and type among settings?
- 3.After review of the initial data, what strategies appear to have the greatest potential for reducing intravenous medication error frequency?
- 4.How effective is an intervention including a bundle of these strategies at multiple sites?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2012
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 24, 2016
August 1, 2016
2.9 years
January 5, 2015
August 23, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
Incident rates of wrong dose
The same medication but the dose is different from the prescribed order.
Two years
Incident rates of wrong rate
A different rate is displayed on the pump from that prescribed in the medical record. Also refers to weight based doses calculated incorrectly including using a wrong weight.
Two years
Incident rates of wrong concentration
An amount of a medication in a unit of solution that is different from the prescribed order.
Two years
Incident rates of wrong IV fluids/medications
A different fluid/medication as documented on the IV bag label is being infused compared with the order in the medical record.
Two years
Incident rates of delay of medication administration
An order to start or change medication or rate not carried out within 4 hours of the written order or intended start time per institution policy.
Two years
Incident rates of omission of IV fluids/medications
The medication ordered was not administered to a patient or administered anytime after 4 hours of the intended start time.
Two years
Incident rates of unauthorized medication
Fluids/medications are administered to the patient but no order is present in medical record. This includes failure to document a verbal order.
Two years
Incident rates of patient identification (ID) error (wrong patient)
Patient either has no ID band on or information on the ID band or label is incorrect.
Two years
Incident rates of smart pump or drug library not used
Smart pump is not used (bypassing smart pump) or smart pump was used but the drug library was not selected, rather manual entry mode was used (bypassing drug library)
Two years
Incident rates of oversight allergy
Medication is administered to a patient with a known allergy to the drug or class.
Two years
Incident rates of pump setting error
Setting programmed into the pump is different from the prescribed order.
Two years
Compliance rate of label not complete according to policy
Documented information on the medication label is different from required information per institution policy.
Two years
Compliance rate of IV tubing not tagged according to policy
IV tubing change label is not tagged per institution policy.
Two years
Incident rates of expired drug
The expiration date or time of the fluids/medications has passed.
Two years
Overall medication errors
Total number of all observed medication errors(including outcome 1-14)
Two years
Higher-severity medication errors
All medication errors with an NCC MERP severity rating of C or greater (excluding violation of hospital policy errors;outcome 12 and 13).
Two years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Compliance rate of using smart pump use
Two years
Compliance rate of using drug library use
Two years
Potential adverse drug events
Two years
Study Arms (10)
Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Patients who had IV medications with smart pumps in one surgical unit, one medical unit, one Medical ICU, and one surgical ICU at Brigham and Women's Hospital. In these unit, the intervention bundle was implemented.
Johns Hopkins University Hospital
Patients who had IV medications with smart pumps in one surgical unit, one medical unit, one Medical ICU, and one surgical ICU at Johns Hopkins University Hospital. In these unit, the intervention bundle was implemented.
Winchester Medical Center
Patients who had IV medications with smart pumps in one surgical unit, one medical unit, one Medical ICU, and one surgical ICU at Winchester Medical Center. In these unit, the intervention bundle was implemented.
Central DuPage Hospital
Patients who had IV medications with smart pumps in one surgical unit, one medical unit, one Medical ICU, and one surgical ICU at Central DuPage Hospital. In these unit, the intervention bundle was implemented.
Vanderbilt University
Patients who had IV medications with smart pumps in one surgical unit, one medical unit, one Medical ICU, and one surgical ICU at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. In these unit, the intervention bundle was implemented.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Patients who had IV medications with smart pumps in one surgical unit, one medical unit, one Medical ICU, and one surgical ICU at Massachusetts General Hospital. In these unit, the intervention bundle was implemented.
University of California, San Diego
Patients who had IV medications with smart pumps in one surgical unit, one medical unit, one Medical ICU, and one surgical ICU at University of California, San Diego. In these unit, the intervention bundle was implemented.
Maricopa Integrated Health System
Patients who had IV medications with smart pumps in one surgical unit, one medical unit, one Medical ICU, and one surgical ICU at Maricopa Integrated Health System. In these unit, the intervention bundle was implemented.
Danbury Hospital
Patients who had IV medications with smart pumps in one surgical unit, one medical unit, one Medical ICU, and one surgical ICU at Danbury Hospital. In these unit, the intervention bundle was implemented.
Candler Hospital
Patients who had IV medications with smart pumps in one surgical unit, one medical unit, one Medical ICU, and one surgical ICU at Candler Hospital. In these unit, the intervention bundle was implemented.
Interventions
Smart pump safety intervention bundle includes three components--1) eliminating unauthorized medications; implement standardized discontinuation policy of medications, implement standardized keep vein open rates and keep vein open rate order sets, and implement standardized verbal order practice. 2) Implement standardized intravenous(IV) labeling and IV tubing labels. 3) Implement standardized drug library lists and drug library use policies
Eligibility Criteria
\- Any patients who are hospitalized in Medical ICU, surgical ICU, medicine unit and surgical unit on the day of data collection
You may qualify if:
- Patients if they receive any IV fluid or medication on the day of observation in the study units.
You may not qualify if:
- patients who are under 21 years old.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brigham and Women's Hospitallead
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
- Winchester Medical Centercollaborator
- Central DuPage Hospitalcollaborator
- Vanderbilt Universitycollaborator
- Massachusetts General Hospitalcollaborator
- University of California, San Diegocollaborator
- Valleywise Healthcollaborator
- Danbury Hospitalcollaborator
- Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentationcollaborator
- CareFusion foundationcollaborator
- Candler Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02120, United States
Related Publications (2)
Schnock KO, Dykes PC, Albert J, Ariosto D, Call R, Cameron C, Carroll DL, Drucker AG, Fang L, Garcia-Palm CA, Husch MM, Maddox RR, McDonald N, McGuire J, Rafie S, Robertson E, Saine D, Sawyer MD, Smith LP, Stinger KD, Vanderveen TW, Wade E, Yoon CS, Lipsitz S, Bates DW. The frequency of intravenous medication administration errors related to smart infusion pumps: a multihospital observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Feb;26(2):131-140. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004465. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
PMID: 26908900RESULTSchnock KO, Dykes PC, Albert J, Ariosto D, Cameron C, Carroll DL, Donahue M, Drucker AG, Duncan R, Fang L, Husch M, McDonald N, Maddox RR, McGuire J, Rafie S, Robertson E, Sawyer M, Wade E, Yoon CS, Lipsitz S, Bates DW. A Multi-hospital Before-After Observational Study Using a Point-Prevalence Approach with an Infusion Safety Intervention Bundle to Reduce Intravenous Medication Administration Errors. Drug Saf. 2018 Jun;41(6):591-602. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0637-3.
PMID: 29411338DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David W Bates, MD, MSc
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief, Division of General Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2015
First Posted
February 10, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 24, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08