Transsphenoidal Extent of Resection Study
TRANSSPHER
Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study Comparing Extent of Tumor Resection Between Microscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery and Fully Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas
1 other identifier
interventional
260
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to compare the extent of resection (EOR) in patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas undergoing transsphenoidal surgery using a microsurgical technique to those patients who have undergone surgery with a fully endoscopic technique. Another goal is to compare surgical complications, endocrine outcomes, visual outcomes, length of surgery, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates between the two transsphenoidal surgery techniques. This is an observational data collection study with no experimental procedures or experimental medicines. Endonasal transsphenoidal removal of a pituitary tumor is a unique procedure and there is little information comparing the two surgical techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 8, 2019
CompletedNovember 25, 2019
November 1, 2019
4 years
January 26, 2015
November 21, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
percentage of patients who have complete tumor removal (gross total resection) based on MRI .
Postop MRI read by neuroradiologist
3 months post surgery
Secondary Outcomes (11)
volume of residual tumor
3 months after date of surgery
percentage of tumor removed
3 months post surgery
postoperative cerebral-spinal fluid (CSF) leak
6 months (continuous) from surgery
postoperative meningitis
6 months (continuous) from surgery
hypopituitarism
6 months post surgery
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
microscopic
ACTIVE COMPARATORMicroscopic transsphenoidal surgery, including endoscopic-assisted approach (350 subjects)
endoscopic
ACTIVE COMPARATORFully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (350 subjects)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with suspected nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas (≥ 1 cm) with planned transsphenoidal surgery
- Adults (age 18-80 years)
- Medically stable for surgery
- Reasonable expectation that patient will complete study and be available for follow-up assessments
You may not qualify if:
- Prisoners
- Pregnant women
- Patients with suspected functioning pituitary adenoma
- Unable to obtain MRI of the pituitary (e.g., pacemaker, anaphylaxis to gadolinium, low GFR)
- Pituitary apoplexy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenixlead
- Saint John's Cancer Institutecollaborator
- Swedish Medical Centercollaborator
- Northwestern Universitycollaborator
- Ohio State Universitycollaborator
- Washington University School of Medicinecollaborator
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Barrow Neurological Institute/St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013, United States
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
John Wayne Cancer Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Swedish Neuroscience Institute
Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States
Related Publications (26)
Wilson CB, Rand RW, Grollmus JM, Heuser G, Levin S, Goldfield E, Schneider V, Linfoot J, Hosobuchi Y. Surgical experience with a microscopic transsphenoidal approach to pituitary tumors and non-neoplastic parasellar conditions. Calif Med. 1972 Nov;117(5):1-9.
PMID: 4638402BACKGROUNDHardy J. Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. J Neurosurg. 1971 Apr;34(4):582-94. doi: 10.3171/jns.1971.34.4.0582. No abstract available.
PMID: 5554367BACKGROUNDFatemi N, Dusick JR, de Paiva Neto MA, Kelly DF. The endonasal microscopic approach for pituitary adenomas and other parasellar tumors: a 10-year experience. Neurosurgery. 2008 Oct;63(4 Suppl 2):244-56; discussion 256. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000327025.03975.BA.
PMID: 18981830BACKGROUNDPatel SK, Husain Q, Eloy JA, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Norman Dott, Gerard Guiot, and Jules Hardy: key players in the resurrection and preservation of transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Aug;33(2):E6. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12125.
PMID: 22853837BACKGROUNDDehdashti AR, Ganna A, Karabatsou K, Gentili F. Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series. Neurosurgery. 2008 May;62(5):1006-15; discussion 1015-7. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325862.83961.12.
PMID: 18580798BACKGROUNDGondim JA, Schops M, de Almeida JP, de Albuquerque LA, Gomes E, Ferraz T, Barroso FA. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: surgical results of 228 pituitary adenomas treated in a pituitary center. Pituitary. 2010;13(1):68-77. doi: 10.1007/s11102-009-0195-x. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
PMID: 19697135BACKGROUNDCavallo LM, Prevedello DM, Solari D, Gardner PA, Esposito F, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Cappabianca P. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg. 2009 Sep;111(3):578-89. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.JNS081026.
PMID: 19326977BACKGROUNDCavallo LM, Prevedello D, Esposito F, Laws ER Jr, Dusick JR, Messina A, Jane JA Jr, Kelly DF, Cappabianca P. The role of the endoscope in the transsphenoidal management of cystic lesions of the sellar region. Neurosurg Rev. 2008 Jan;31(1):55-64; discussion 64. doi: 10.1007/s10143-007-0098-0. Epub 2007 Oct 6.
PMID: 17922153BACKGROUNDJho HD, Alfieri A. Endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery: evolution of surgical technique and equipment in 150 operations. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2001 Mar;44(1):1-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13590.
PMID: 11409304BACKGROUNDJho HD, Carrau RL. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jul;87(1):44-51. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0044.
PMID: 9202264BACKGROUNDAmmirati M, Wei L, Ciric I. Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;84(8):843-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303194. Epub 2012 Dec 15.
PMID: 23243265BACKGROUNDStarke RM, Raper DM, Payne SC, Vance ML, Oldfield EH, Jane JA Jr. Endoscopic vs microsurgical transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: outcomes in a concurrent series of patients using modern criteria for remission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Aug;98(8):3190-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1036. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
PMID: 23737543BACKGROUNDMcLaughlin N, Eisenberg AA, Cohan P, Chaloner CB, Kelly DF. Value of endoscopy for maximizing tumor removal in endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery. J Neurosurg. 2013 Mar;118(3):613-20. doi: 10.3171/2012.11.JNS112020. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
PMID: 23240699BACKGROUNDDallapiazza R, Bond AE, Grober Y, Louis RG, Payne SC, Oldfield EH, Jane JA Jr. Retrospective analysis of a concurrent series of microscopic versus endoscopic transsphenoidal surgeries for Knosp Grades 0-2 nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas at a single institution. J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):511-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.JNS131321. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
PMID: 24995783BACKGROUNDLittle AS, Kelly D, Milligan J, Griffiths C, Rosseau G, Prevedello DM, Carrau R, Jahnke H, Chaloner C, O'Leary J, Chapple K, Nakaji P, White WL. Prospective validation of a patient-reported nasal quality-of-life tool for endonasal skull base surgery: The Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12. J Neurosurg. 2013 Oct;119(4):1068-74. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.JNS122032. Epub 2013 May 10.
PMID: 23662829BACKGROUNDGao Y, Zhong C, Wang Y, Xu S, Guo Y, Dai C, Zheng Y, Wang Y, Luo Q, Jiang J. Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr 11;12:94. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-94.
PMID: 24721812BACKGROUNDGoudakos JK, Markou KD, Georgalas C. Endoscopic versus microscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Jun;36(3):212-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02331.x.
PMID: 21752205BACKGROUNDRudmik L, Starreveld YP, Vandergrift WA, Banglawala SM, Soler ZM. Cost-effectiveness of the endoscopic versus microscopic approach for pituitary adenoma resection. Laryngoscope. 2015 Jan;125(1):16-24. doi: 10.1002/lary.24780. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
PMID: 24938934BACKGROUNDTabaee A, Anand VK, Barron Y, Hiltzik DH, Brown SM, Kacker A, Mazumdar M, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2009 Sep;111(3):545-54. doi: 10.3171/2007.12.17635.
PMID: 19199461BACKGROUNDZhu M, Yang J, Wang Y, Cao W, Zhu Y, Qiu L, Tao Y, Xu Y, Xu H. [Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery versus microsurgery for the resection of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;49(3):236-9. Chinese.
PMID: 24820497BACKGROUNDKomotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg. 2012 Feb;77(2):329-41. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
PMID: 22501020BACKGROUNDLittle AS, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Chicoine MR, Barkhoudarian G, Prevedello DM, Yuen KCJ, Kelly DF; TRANSSPHER Study Group. Pituitary gland recovery following fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Neurosurg. 2019 Nov 15;133(6):1732-1738. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.JNS191012. Print 2020 Dec 1.
PMID: 31731279RESULTLittle AS, Chicoine MR, Kelly DF, Sarris CE, Mooney MA, White WL, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Barkhoudarian G, Chandler JP, Prevedello DM, Liebelt BD, Sfondouris J, Mayberg MR; TRANSSPHER Study Group. Evaluation of Surgical Resection Goal and Its Relationship to Extent of Resection and Patient Outcomes in a Multicenter Prospective Study of Patients With Surgically Treated, Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas: A Case Series. Oper Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 1;18(1):26-33. doi: 10.1093/ons/opz085.
PMID: 31079156RESULTLittle AS, Kelly DF, White WL, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Chicoine MR, Barkhoudarian G, Chandler JP, Prevedello DM, Liebelt BD, Sfondouris J, Mayberg MR; TRANSSPHER Study Group. Results of a prospective multicenter controlled study comparing surgical outcomes of microscopic versus fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: the Transsphenoidal Extent of Resection (TRANSSPHER) Study. J Neurosurg. 2019 Mar 22;132(4):1043-1053. doi: 10.3171/2018.11.JNS181238. Print 2020 Apr 1.
PMID: 30901746RESULTMooney MA, Sarris CE, Zhou JJ, Barkhoudarian G, Chicoine MR, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Hardesty DA, Jahnke H, Kelly DF, Liebelt BD, Mayberg MR, Prevedello DM, Sfondouris J, Sheehy JP, Chandler JP, Yuen KCJ, White WL, Little AS; TRANSSPHER Study Group. Proposal and Validation of a Simple Grading Scale (TRANSSPHER Grade) for Predicting Gross Total Resection of Nonfunctioning Pituitary Macroadenomas After Transsphenoidal Surgery. Oper Neurosurg. 2019 Nov 1;17(5):460-469. doi: 10.1093/ons/opy401.
PMID: 30649445RESULTMooney MA, Herro AM, Fintelmann RE, Mayberg MR, Barkhoudarian G, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Chicoine MR, Kelly DF, Chandler JP, Jahnke H, White WL, Little AS. Visual Field Outcome Reporting in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned from a Prospective, Multicenter Study of Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e326-e332. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.069. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
PMID: 30144606RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Little, MD
Saint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center/Barrow Neurological Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Research Operations Manager
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2015
First Posted
February 6, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 1, 2019
Study Completion
April 8, 2019
Last Updated
November 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share