NCT02357056

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to objectively compare various training modalities currently available in minimally invasive and robotic surgery to determine the most effective training methods specific to robotic cardiac surgery. We hope to recruit medical trainees with minimal robotic surgery training experience, randomly assigned to one of three groups (Dry wab, da Vinci Simulator and Wet lab). Trainees will be evaluated at baseline for a standardized tasks common in robotic cardiac surgery and then divided into one of the three training modalities. Trainees will be given sufficient time to become proficient with a variety of predetermined tasks unique to each training group. The trainees will then undergo a reevaluation with the cardiac surgery specific tasks at the end of a standard training period. We will then be able to compare our three groups to show if any have benefits over the others in regards to improvement in technical ability, understanding of the robots functions, efficacy of training, speed of technical skill development, accuracy and efficiency of movement. We will rate each modality on their reproducibility, accuracy of representation, and ease of set up and perform a cost analysis for each of the training methods.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 29, 2015

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 6, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

November 6, 2018

Status Verified

November 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

January 29, 2015

Last Update Submit

November 2, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Time to Complete Mitral Valve Annuloplasty

    A total score for this task will be generated from the formula; Score = 720 - Time(s), If any damage is done to the tissues a score of zero will be assessed.

    3 months

  • Time To Complete 10cm dissection of the Internal Thoracic Artery

    A total score for this task will be generated from the formula; Score = 1320 - Time(s), If any damage is done to the tissues a score of zero will be assessed.

    3 months

  • Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) Score

    A validated objective scoring tool will be used to evaluate overall robotic surgical skill for each task.

    3 Months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Duration of Training

    3 Months

Study Arms (4)

Wet Lab

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects in the wet lab group will perform dissections of the internal thoracic artery and placement of annuloplasty stitches in the mitral valve in pig models until time proficiency is reached based on the performance of our expert robotic surgeons.

Other: Wet Lab

Dry Lab

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects in the dry lab group will perform exercises form the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) program adapted for the daVinci robot. These exercises included, camera and clutching, peg transfer and intracorporeal knot tying. Participants will repeat these tasks until time proficiency is reached based on the performance of our expert robotic surgeons.

Other: Dry Lab

Virtual Reality

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects in the virtual reality group will perform exercises from a 9 task curriculum, on the daVinci Skills Simulator. These exercises included, camera and clutching, energy switching, peg board, energy dissection, matchboard, ringwalk, suture sponge, and vertical defect suturing. Participants will repeat these tasks all metrics are passed and an overall score is reached based on the performance of our expert robotic surgeons.

Other: Virtual Reality

Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will receive no training after they complete the initial assessment and undergo randomization. They will be invited back after several weeks to complete the final assessment to control for any improvement in performance from the initial assessment alone and normal progression through surgical training outside of this project.

Interventions

Wet LabOTHER

ITA dissection and Annuloplasty Sutures in porcine model.

Wet Lab
Dry LabOTHER

Camera and clutching, peg transferring, intracorporeal knot tying

Dry Lab

daVinci Surgical Skills simulation

Virtual Reality

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Residents, fellows and staff of a surgical specialty with less then 10 hours using the daVinci robot or any robotic simulator.

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals not associated with a surgical program
  • Individuals with \>10 hours experience driving the daVinci Robot or any robotic simulator

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Canadian Surgical Technologies & Advanced Robotics (CSTAR)

London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Valdis M, Chu MW, Schlachta CM, Kiaii B. Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Training Curriculum for Robotic Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Trial. Innovations (Phila). 2015 Nov-Dec;10(6):383-8. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000222.

Study Officials

  • Bob Kiaii, MD

    Department of Cardiac Surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2015

First Posted

February 6, 2015

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2015

Study Completion

July 1, 2015

Last Updated

November 6, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-11

Locations