NCT02354664

Brief Summary

This study intends to evaluate dynamic respiratory motor performance as a valuable measure of pulmonary function in adults with late-onset Pompe disease. The investigators will adopt a strategy that includes comprehensive evaluations of respiratory volume, flow, and timing parameters during resting and loaded breathing. These evaluations will then be associated to the standard clinical measure of maximal inspiratory pressure, the static inspiratory muscle function, as well as magnetic resonance imaging of thoracic expansion and diaphragmatic descent at rest and with exertion. Outcomes in participants with late-onset Pompe disease will be contrasted to the function of age- and gender-matched control subjects. This approach will enable the investigators to evaluate the relationship between dynamic diaphragmatic function and respiratory motor function.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 21, 2015

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 3, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2015

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 19, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 19, 2016

Completed
7.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 24, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 24, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

January 21, 2015

Results QC Date

March 17, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 12, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

respiratory testrespiratory muscle endurancespirometry

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Inspiratory Load Compensation - Inspiratory Volume

    For ILC testing, a commercially available, spring-loaded device provided a pressure load to inspiration that is independent of inspiratory flow. The patient had to generate enough threshold inspiratory pressure in order to receive airflow. The tension of the spring was adjusted to regulate the threshold pressure of the imposed load. Volume, flow and timing responses were evaluated to an inspiratory threshold load equivalent to 40% of PImax.

    Day 1

  • Respiratory Muscle Endurance Task

    Endurance was evaluated by identifying the time limit (Tlim) that a participant could maintain ventilation while breathing with a submaximal inspiratory threshold load. The test begin after a one-hour rest. After reaching a steady state breathing pattern (e.g. stable tidal volumes for \>30 seconds), a threshold inspiratory load equivalent to 40% of PIMAX was placed on the inspiratory port of the mouthpiece. During the loaded breathing condition, the respiratory rate was set to each subject's self-selected resting breathing rate. The perceived exertion was monitored, and subjects received encouragement to maintain the target rate and mouth pressure. Encouragement was provided to maintain the established breathing pattern and to continue to task failure. The test ended when the subject could not open the threshold valve for three consecutive breaths.

    Day 2

  • Inspiratory Load Compensation - Inspiratory Flow

    For ILC testing, a commercially available, spring-loaded device provided a pressure load to inspiration that is independent of inspiratory flow. The patient had to generate enough threshold inspiratory pressure in order to receive airflow. The tension of the spring was adjusted to regulate the threshold pressure of the imposed load. Volume, flow and timing responses were evaluated to an inspiratory threshold load equivalent to 40% of PImax.

    Day 1

  • Inspiratory Load Compensation - Inspiratory Time

    For ILC testing, a commercially available, spring-loaded device provided a pressure load to inspiration that is independent of inspiratory flow. The patient had to generate enough threshold inspiratory pressure in order to receive airflow. The tension of the spring was adjusted to regulate the threshold pressure of the imposed load. Volume, flow and timing responses were evaluated to an inspiratory threshold load equivalent to 40% of PImax.

    Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Thoracic MRI

    Day 1

Study Arms (2)

Pompe subjects

These subjects will receive a thoracic MRI, spirometry, inspiratory load compensation, maximal inspiratory pressure, resting breathing pattern, respiratory muscle endurance test.

Other: Thoracic MRIOther: SpirometryOther: Inspiratory Load CompensationOther: Maximal Inspiratory PressureOther: Resting Breathing PatternOther: Respiratory Muscle Endurance Test

Control subjects

These subjects will receive a thoracic MRI, spirometry, inspiratory load compensation, maximal inspiratory pressure, resting breathing pattern, respiratory muscle endurance test.

Other: Thoracic MRIOther: SpirometryOther: Inspiratory Load CompensationOther: Maximal Inspiratory PressureOther: Resting Breathing PatternOther: Respiratory Muscle Endurance Test

Interventions

Imaging of the diaphragm will be completed during resting breathing, and then during a maximal voluntary ventilation maneuver.

Control subjectsPompe subjects

Upright forced vital capacity (FVC)

Control subjectsPompe subjects

A spring-loaded pressure device will resist inspiration. The patient must generate the threshold inspiratory pressure to receive airflow. The changes in breathing timing, flow and volume will be recorded.

Control subjectsPompe subjects

Measure the maximal airflow on inhalation

Also known as: MIP
Control subjectsPompe subjects

The breathing pattern will be assessed when the subject is seated and in a relaxed state.

Control subjectsPompe subjects

Evaluates the time limit that a participant can maintain ventilation while breathing with a submaximal inspiratory threshold load.

Control subjectsPompe subjects

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Subjects with late-onset Pompe disease, age 20-65 years, and age and gender-matched unaffected control subjects

You may qualify if:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of Pompe disease OR
  • Be an age and gender-matched unaffected control subject

You may not qualify if:

  • Pre-existing obstructive lung disease or asthma
  • Forced vital capacity (FVC) \<30% or \>80% of age/gender predicted values
  • Inability to travel to the study site
  • Requirement for positive pressure ventilator support when awake and upright
  • Participation in longitudinal studies that may independently alter lung function
  • Presence of any other chronic medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, 32606, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glycogen Storage Disease Type II

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lysosomal Storage Diseases, Nervous SystemBrain Diseases, Metabolic, InbornBrain Diseases, MetabolicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMetabolism, Inborn ErrorsGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesGlycogen Storage DiseaseCarbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsLysosomal Storage DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Barbara Smith, Assistant Professor
Organization
University of Florida

Study Officials

  • Barbara K. Smith, PT, PhD

    University of Florida

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2015

First Posted

February 3, 2015

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion

October 19, 2016

Study Completion

October 19, 2016

Last Updated

June 24, 2024

Results First Posted

June 24, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations