Dynamic Respiratory Muscle Function in Late-Onset Pompe Disease
DRMF
1 other identifier
observational
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study intends to evaluate dynamic respiratory motor performance as a valuable measure of pulmonary function in adults with late-onset Pompe disease. The investigators will adopt a strategy that includes comprehensive evaluations of respiratory volume, flow, and timing parameters during resting and loaded breathing. These evaluations will then be associated to the standard clinical measure of maximal inspiratory pressure, the static inspiratory muscle function, as well as magnetic resonance imaging of thoracic expansion and diaphragmatic descent at rest and with exertion. Outcomes in participants with late-onset Pompe disease will be contrasted to the function of age- and gender-matched control subjects. This approach will enable the investigators to evaluate the relationship between dynamic diaphragmatic function and respiratory motor function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Apr 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 19, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 19, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 24, 2024
CompletedJune 24, 2024
January 1, 2024
1.6 years
January 21, 2015
March 17, 2023
January 12, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Inspiratory Load Compensation - Inspiratory Volume
For ILC testing, a commercially available, spring-loaded device provided a pressure load to inspiration that is independent of inspiratory flow. The patient had to generate enough threshold inspiratory pressure in order to receive airflow. The tension of the spring was adjusted to regulate the threshold pressure of the imposed load. Volume, flow and timing responses were evaluated to an inspiratory threshold load equivalent to 40% of PImax.
Day 1
Respiratory Muscle Endurance Task
Endurance was evaluated by identifying the time limit (Tlim) that a participant could maintain ventilation while breathing with a submaximal inspiratory threshold load. The test begin after a one-hour rest. After reaching a steady state breathing pattern (e.g. stable tidal volumes for \>30 seconds), a threshold inspiratory load equivalent to 40% of PIMAX was placed on the inspiratory port of the mouthpiece. During the loaded breathing condition, the respiratory rate was set to each subject's self-selected resting breathing rate. The perceived exertion was monitored, and subjects received encouragement to maintain the target rate and mouth pressure. Encouragement was provided to maintain the established breathing pattern and to continue to task failure. The test ended when the subject could not open the threshold valve for three consecutive breaths.
Day 2
Inspiratory Load Compensation - Inspiratory Flow
For ILC testing, a commercially available, spring-loaded device provided a pressure load to inspiration that is independent of inspiratory flow. The patient had to generate enough threshold inspiratory pressure in order to receive airflow. The tension of the spring was adjusted to regulate the threshold pressure of the imposed load. Volume, flow and timing responses were evaluated to an inspiratory threshold load equivalent to 40% of PImax.
Day 1
Inspiratory Load Compensation - Inspiratory Time
For ILC testing, a commercially available, spring-loaded device provided a pressure load to inspiration that is independent of inspiratory flow. The patient had to generate enough threshold inspiratory pressure in order to receive airflow. The tension of the spring was adjusted to regulate the threshold pressure of the imposed load. Volume, flow and timing responses were evaluated to an inspiratory threshold load equivalent to 40% of PImax.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Thoracic MRI
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Pompe subjects
These subjects will receive a thoracic MRI, spirometry, inspiratory load compensation, maximal inspiratory pressure, resting breathing pattern, respiratory muscle endurance test.
Control subjects
These subjects will receive a thoracic MRI, spirometry, inspiratory load compensation, maximal inspiratory pressure, resting breathing pattern, respiratory muscle endurance test.
Interventions
Imaging of the diaphragm will be completed during resting breathing, and then during a maximal voluntary ventilation maneuver.
A spring-loaded pressure device will resist inspiration. The patient must generate the threshold inspiratory pressure to receive airflow. The changes in breathing timing, flow and volume will be recorded.
Measure the maximal airflow on inhalation
The breathing pattern will be assessed when the subject is seated and in a relaxed state.
Evaluates the time limit that a participant can maintain ventilation while breathing with a submaximal inspiratory threshold load.
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects with late-onset Pompe disease, age 20-65 years, and age and gender-matched unaffected control subjects
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed diagnosis of Pompe disease OR
- Be an age and gender-matched unaffected control subject
You may not qualify if:
- Pre-existing obstructive lung disease or asthma
- Forced vital capacity (FVC) \<30% or \>80% of age/gender predicted values
- Inability to travel to the study site
- Requirement for positive pressure ventilator support when awake and upright
- Participation in longitudinal studies that may independently alter lung function
- Presence of any other chronic medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Floridalead
- BioMarin Pharmaceuticalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32606, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Barbara Smith, Assistant Professor
- Organization
- University of Florida
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barbara K. Smith, PT, PhD
University of Florida
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2015
First Posted
February 3, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 19, 2016
Study Completion
October 19, 2016
Last Updated
June 24, 2024
Results First Posted
June 24, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share