Study Stopped
Insufficient Recruitment
Investigating the Clinical Consequences of Flutemetamol-PET-scanning
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study examines subjects where there might be an indication for Amyloid-PET according to the Criteria defined by the Amyloid Imaging Task Force. In these subjects the impact of a Flutemetamol (Vizamyl)-Positron-Emission-Tomography -Scan (PET) on clinical management and disease course will be studied over 6 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 10, 2019
CompletedJanuary 21, 2020
January 1, 2020
4.6 years
January 22, 2015
January 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of ADAS-cog 11 score compared to pre-treatment assessment in Flutemetamol positive subjects with a postscan diagnosis of AD and start of cholinesterase inhibitors as standard treatment.
Three months after initiation of standard treatment
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change of ADCS-ADL score compared to pre-treatment assessment in Flutemetamol positive subjects with a postscan diagnosis of AD and start of cholinesterase inhibitors as standard treatment.
Three months after initiation of standard treatment
Change of ADCS-CGIC score compared to pre-treatment assessment in Flutemetamol positive subjects with a postscan diagnosis of AD and start of cholinesterase inhibitors as standard treatment.
Three months after initiation of standard treatment
Change of MMSE score compared to pre-treatment assessment in Flutemetamol positive subjects with a postscan diagnosis of AD and start of cholinesterase inhibitors as standard treatment.
Three months after initiation of standard treatment
Other Outcomes (6)
Comparisons of change from pre-treatment assessment of ADAS-Cog-11 after 6 months in clinical constellations defined by clinical diagnosis and Flutemetamol-status
Six Months after initiation of standard treatment
Comparisons of change from pre-treatment assessment of ADCS-ADL after 6 months in clinical constellations defined by clinical diagnosis and Flutemetamol-status
Six Months after initiation of standard treatment
Comparisons of change from pre-treatment assessment of MMSE after 6 months in clinical constellations defined by clinical diagnosis and Flutemetamol-status
Six Months after initiation of standard treatment
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Flutmetamol Group
EXPERIMENTALPET-MR-Scan with 80-140 MBq Flutemetamol before observational period for diagnostic purpose
Interventions
PET-MR Scan using the radiotracer Flutemetamol (Vizamyl) for diagnostic purpose
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Dementia expert considers an Amyloid-scan appropriate according to Amyloid-imaging task force criteria (AIT) after conference with an Amyloid-PET expert
- Preambles of the AIT-Criteria are fulfilled
- A cognitive complaint with objectively confirmed impairment
- AD as a possible diagnosis, but when the diagnosis is uncertain after a comprehensive evaluation by a dementia expert
- When knowledge of the presence or absence of Abeta pathology is expected to increase diagnostic certainty and alter Management
- <!-- -->
- Patients with persistent or progressive unexplained MCI
- Patients satisfying core clinical criteria for possible AD because of unclear clinical presentation, either an atypical clinical course or an etiologically mixed presentation
- Patients with progressive dementia and atypically early age of onset (65 years or less in age)
- other situations where preambles of AIT-Criteria are fulfilled
- Diagnosis was established in a memory clinic or by an experienced physician in dementia diagnostics
- MMSE \>15
- Competency to consent
- Trial partner willing to support study physician
- Written informed consent by both patient and trial partner
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment which can be attributed to another underlying medical condition that renders a possibility of Alzheimer's disease very unlikely (thus violating preamble B)
- Clinically significant Depression (decided upon clinical assessment)
- Allergy to Flutemetamol or any of the excipients of the solution for injections
- History of severe allergic reactions to drugs or allergens
- Pregnancy or lactation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Zurichlead
- ETH Zurichcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Zurich, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Center for Prevention and Dementia Therapy
Schlieren, Canton of Zurich, 8952, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christoph Hock, MD, Prof.
University of Zurich, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Center for Prevention and Dementia Therapy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2015
First Posted
February 3, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 10, 2019
Study Completion
December 10, 2019
Last Updated
January 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01