Effect of Copper Impregnated Textiles on Healthcare Associated Infections and Antibiotic Use
1 other identifier
observational
1,302
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective Infection Control study comparing rates of antibiotic usage and infections in the General Intensive Care Unit (GICU) in beds with copper impregnated linens versus regular linens.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 5, 2015
August 1, 2015
1.6 years
January 27, 2015
August 4, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Antibiotic usage in copper impregnated vs regular linen wards >48 hours after admission to ICU
To assess whether the use of copper impregnated linens was associated with decreased use of antibiotics
Two study periods of 23 weeks each
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Decrease in clinical infection
Two study periods of 23 weeks each
Decrease in NHSN infection
Two study periods of 23 weeks each
Study Arms (1)
Copper linens
One ward during each period (23 weeks each) used copper impregnated linen on the bed and as patient gowns. The second ward used regular linen on the bed and as patient gowns
Interventions
Copper impregnated linen was used in place of regular linen on one ward (out of two) for each period of the study. Each study period lasted for 23 weeks. After the washout period (3 weeks) the wards were switched.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients \>18 years and \<90 years who were admitted to the GICU during the study period
You may not qualify if:
- Those that did not meet the age criteria as above.
- Any patients with Menke's syndrome or Wilson's disease
- Any patient with an allergy to copper or iodine
- Any patient who wishes to opt out of participating
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Eastern Virginia Medical Schoollead
- Cupron Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Related Publications (3)
Schmidt MG, Attaway Iii HH, Fairey SE, Steed LL, Michels HT, Salgado CD. Copper continuously limits the concentration of bacteria resident on bed rails within the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 May;34(5):530-3. doi: 10.1086/670224.
PMID: 23571374BACKGROUNDSalgado CD, Sepkowitz KA, John JF, Cantey JR, Attaway HH, Freeman KD, Sharpe PA, Michels HT, Schmidt MG. Copper surfaces reduce the rate of healthcare-acquired infections in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 May;34(5):479-86. doi: 10.1086/670207.
PMID: 23571364BACKGROUNDBilian X. Intrauterine devices. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Apr;16(2):155-68. doi: 10.1053/beog.2002.0267.
PMID: 12041959BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shivanjali Shankaran, MD
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2015
First Posted
January 30, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 5, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08