NCT02339233

Brief Summary

The overall aim is to assess whether task specific locomotor training and spinal cord electrical stimulation (SCES) can induce neural reorganization of the functionally isolated human spinal cord to improve standing and stepping in individuals with functionally complete SCI. The investigators propose that locomotor training will result in generation of more effective standing and stepping efferent patterns by restoring phase dependent modulation of reflexes and reciprocal inhibition, reducing clonus and mediating interlimb coordination. The investigators propose that the SCES will optimize the physiological state of the spinal cord interneuronal circuitry compromised by compensating for loss of supraspinal input for the retraining of these tasks.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 12, 2015

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 15, 2015

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 3, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 3, 2019

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 22, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 22, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

9.8 years

First QC Date

January 12, 2015

Results QC Date

September 17, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 21, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Epidural Stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change From Baseline of Lower Extremity Independence Time During 10 Min Standing Bout After 160 Sessions (1 Year)

    We will measure the amount of time individuals are able to stand without manual assistance (independently) throughout a 10 min bout

    Baseline, 160 sessions (1 year)

  • Change From Baseline of Stepping Independence Time During 6 Min Stepping Bout After 160 Sessions (1 Year)

    We will measure the number of steps individuals are able to take without manual assistance (independently) throughout a 6 min stepping bout

    Baseline, 160 session (1 year)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline of Number of Consecutive Hip Flexion Repetitions Performed Within One Minute After 160 Sessions (1 Year)

    Baseline, 160 sessions (1 year)

Study Arms (1)

Epidural Stimulator

EXPERIMENTAL

Eligible participants will be implanted with 16-electrode epidural array in the T11-L1 area of the spinal cord

Device: Standing and Stepping with spinal cord Epidural Stimulation

Interventions

Standing and Stepping with support from trainers as needed, overground or in a harness with body weight support on a treadmill. Epidural stimulation with specific configurations will be administered to generate standing and stepping.

Also known as: Stand-scES, Step-scES, Locomotor Training (LT)
Epidural Stimulator

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All research participants, irrespective of age or sex, will meet the following criteria:
  • stable medical condition without cardiopulmonary disease or dysautonomia that would contraindicate standing or stepping with BWST;
  • no painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, contracture, pressure sore, or urinary tract infection that might interfere with stand or step training;
  • no clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse;
  • no current anti-spasticity medication regimen;
  • non-progressive SCI above T10;
  • must not have received botox injections in the prior six months;
  • be unable to stand or step independently;
  • at least one-year post injury; and
  • must be at least 18 years of age.
  • In addition, all subjects must satisfy each of the three conditions of the functional neurophysiological assessment described below.
  • There is no descending volitional control of movement below the lesion
  • Segmental reflexes remain functional below the lesion
  • Brain influence on spinal reflexes is retained

You may not qualify if:

  • Ventilatory dependent
  • painful musculoskeletal function, unhealed fracture, contracture, or pressure sore that might interfere with training;
  • clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse;
  • cardiovascular, respiratory, bladder or renal disease unrelated to SCI;
  • severe anemia (Hgb\<8 g/dL) or hypovolemia; and
  • HIV or AIDS related illness.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Herrity AN, Williams CS, Angeli CA, Harkema SJ, Hubscher CH. Lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation improves voiding function after human spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 6;8(1):8688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26602-2.

    PMID: 29875362BACKGROUND
  • Mesbah S, Angeli CA, Keynton RS, El-Baz A, Harkema SJ. A novel approach for automatic visualization and activation detection of evoked potentials induced by epidural spinal cord stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 11;12(10):e0185582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185582. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 29020054BACKGROUND
  • Sayenko DG, Angeli C, Harkema SJ, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP. Neuromodulation of evoked muscle potentials induced by epidural spinal-cord stimulation in paralyzed individuals. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Mar;111(5):1088-99. doi: 10.1152/jn.00489.2013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

    PMID: 24335213BACKGROUND
  • Angeli CA, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Harkema SJ. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain. 2014 May;137(Pt 5):1394-409. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu038. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

  • Angeli CA, Boakye M, Morton RA, Vogt J, Benton K, Chen Y, Ferreira CK, Harkema SJ. Recovery of Over-Ground Walking after Chronic Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury. N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 27;379(13):1244-1250. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803588. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

  • Rejc E, Angeli CA, Atkinson D, Harkema SJ. Motor recovery after activity-based training with spinal cord epidural stimulation in a chronic motor complete paraplegic. Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 26;7(1):13476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14003-w.

  • Rejc E, Angeli CA, Bryant N, Harkema SJ. Effects of Stand and Step Training with Epidural Stimulation on Motor Function for Standing in Chronic Complete Paraplegics. J Neurotrauma. 2017 May 1;34(9):1787-1802. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4516. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

  • Rejc E, Angeli C, Harkema S. Effects of Lumbosacral Spinal Cord Epidural Stimulation for Standing after Chronic Complete Paralysis in Humans. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0133998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133998. eCollection 2015.

  • Harkema S, Gerasimenko Y, Hodes J, Burdick J, Angeli C, Chen Y, Ferreira C, Willhite A, Rejc E, Grossman RG, Edgerton VR. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1938-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60547-3. Epub 2011 May 19.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Susan Harkema
Organization
University of Lousiville

Study Officials

  • Susan Harkema, PhD

    University of Louisville

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2015

First Posted

January 15, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

October 3, 2019

Study Completion

October 3, 2019

Last Updated

April 22, 2022

Results First Posted

April 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Locations