Compare Two Guidance Techniques for Botulinum Toxin Injections for the Treatment of Limb Spasticity and Focal Dystonia
Comparison of Electrophysiologic And Ultrasound Guidance For Onabotulinum Toxin A Injections in Focal Upper Extremity Dystonia And Spasticity
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study seeks to compare the use of ultrasound and electrophysiologic techniques to target muscles for the treatment of spasticity and focal dystonia of the limbs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of two ways of locating the muscle for botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection for the treatment of focal hand dystonia and upper limb spasticity. Electrophysiologic guidance, using electrical stimulation, and ultrasound are the standard ways of locating muscles during a treatment of BoNT injection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 28, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 3, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 26, 2021
CompletedNovember 26, 2021
October 1, 2021
4.4 years
December 24, 2014
October 28, 2021
October 28, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Patient Global Impression of Change
clinical or patient self-rating form for grading evaluation of the treatment at 16 weeks as compared to at 4 weeks. Full scale from 0 = no improvement and 100 normal use. Higher score indicates better health outcome.
4 weeks and 16 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Visual Analog Scale
4 weeks and 16 weeks
Change in Muscle Strength
4 weeks and 16 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Electrophysiologic guidance
EXPERIMENTALElectrophysiologic guidance, using electrical stimulation
Ultrasound guidance
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound guidance,using sound waves through a wand directed towards the targeted muscles.
Interventions
The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of two ways of locating the muscle for botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection for the treatment of focal hand dystonia and upper limb spasticity located by either electrical stimulation using a needle or ultrasound using sound waves.
The purpose of this study is to compare how the muscle is located by either electrical stimulation using a needle or ultrasound using sound waves.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Confirmed diagnosis of focal upper extremity dystonia (FHD) or upper limb spasticity
- Stable onabotulinumtoxinA dose regimen with a stable response as judged by the physician and patient for at least 2 treatment sessions.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to botulinum toxin
- Pregnancy or nursing
- Cognitive impairment that prevents reliable outcome measures of self-report
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinailead
- Allergancollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Ninds, Nih
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- David Simpson, M.D.
- Organization
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Simpson, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Neurology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2014
First Posted
January 8, 2015
Study Start
October 28, 2015
Primary Completion
March 3, 2020
Study Completion
March 3, 2020
Last Updated
November 26, 2021
Results First Posted
November 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10