NCT02373774

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if performing an ultrasound to identify the space to insert the needle before performing a lumbar puncture will improve success of the procedure and patient safety.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
81

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2015

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 27, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2015

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2016

Completed
7.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 24, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 24, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

February 7, 2015

Results QC Date

March 3, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 22, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

infantlumbar puncturepatient safetyultrasound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Lumbar Puncture Success - Composite Score Including Lab Results and Reported Attempts

    Our primary outcome of the clinical trial is binary, success or failure of lumbar puncture. Success is defined as obtaining a sample of cerebrospinal fluid on the first attempt that has a red blood cell count of \<1000 red blood cells per high-powered field.

    Outcome measured on the same day of the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Attempts- Per Direct Observation

    Outcome measured at the time of the procedure (same day)

Study Arms (2)

Standard Anatomic Palpation Technique

NO INTERVENTION

Participants randomized to this group will receive standard of care treatment with providers using the palpation technique to select an interspace to perform lumbar puncture.

Pre-Procedural Ultrasound

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized to this group will receive an ultrasound of the interspace selected via the palpation method prior to performance of the lumbar puncture to determine measurements of appropriate angle and depth and evaluation of any overlying vasculature.

Device: Ultrasound

Interventions

Patients will receive an ultrasound prior to lumbar puncture procedure to help visualize and select spinal interspace.

Also known as: (Zonare Z1.pro and/or Sonosite Mturbo)
Pre-Procedural Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 90 Days
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient is less than 90 days old.
  • Patient is receiving a lumbar puncture

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient is clinically unstable
  • Patient had a previous lumbar puncture in the past 24 hours
  • An outside consultant (not working in ED) is performing the LP
  • Patient has developmental delay or neurological impairment
  • There is no legal guardian present
  • The legal guardians speak neither English nor Spanish
  • There is no ultrasound personnel available to enroll

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Columbia University

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Alpern ER, Stanley RM, Gorelick MH, Donaldson A, Knight S, Teach SJ, Singh T, Mahajan P, Goepp JG, Kuppermann N, Dean JM, Chamberlain JM; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. Epidemiology of a pediatric emergency medicine research network: the PECARN Core Data Project. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Oct;22(10):689-99. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000236830.39194.c0.

    PMID: 17047467BACKGROUND
  • Jain S, Cheng J, Alpern ER, Thurm C, Schroeder L, Black K, Ellison AM, Stone K, Alessandrini EA. Management of febrile neonates in US pediatric emergency departments. Pediatrics. 2014 Feb;133(2):187-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1820. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

    PMID: 24470644BACKGROUND
  • Kessler DO, Arteaga G, Ching K, Haubner L, Kamdar G, Krantz A, Lindower J, Miller M, Petrescu M, Pusic MV, Rocker J, Shah N, Strother C, Tilt L, Weinberg ER, Chang TP, Fein DM, Auerbach M. Interns' success with clinical procedures in infants after simulation training. Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):e811-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0607. Epub 2013 Feb 25.

    PMID: 23439901BACKGROUND
  • Nigrovic LE, Kuppermann N, Neuman MI. Risk factors for traumatic or unsuccessful lumbar punctures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):762-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.018. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

    PMID: 17321005BACKGROUND
  • Glatstein MM, Zucker-Toledano M, Arik A, Scolnik D, Oren A, Reif S. Incidence of traumatic lumbar puncture: experience of a large, tertiary care pediatric hospital. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 Nov;50(11):1005-9. doi: 10.1177/0009922811410309. Epub 2011 May 27.

    PMID: 21622691BACKGROUND
  • Bonadio W. Pediatric lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid analysis. J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.056. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

    PMID: 24188604BACKGROUND
  • Duniec L, Nowakowski P, Kosson D, Lazowski T. Anatomical landmarks based assessment of intravertebral space level for lumbar puncture is misleading in more than 30%. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;45(1):1-6. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2013.0001.

    PMID: 23572300BACKGROUND
  • Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia. 2002 Mar;57(3):277-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.2403_4.x.

    PMID: 11892638BACKGROUND
  • Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, Schoelles K, McDonald KM, Dy SM, Shojania K, Reston J, Berger Z, Johnsen B, Larkin JW, Lucas S, Martinez K, Motala A, Newberry SJ, Noble M, Pfoh E, Ranji SR, Rennke S, Schmidt E, Shanman R, Sullivan N, Sun F, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Tsou A, Vaiana ME, Weaver SJ, Wilson R, Winters BD. Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2013 Mar;(211):1-945.

    PMID: 24423049BACKGROUND
  • Coley BD, Shiels WE 2nd, Hogan MJ. Diagnostic and interventional ultrasonography in neonatal and infant lumbar puncture. Pediatr Radiol. 2001 Jun;31(6):399-402. doi: 10.1007/s002470100453.

    PMID: 11436885BACKGROUND
  • Abo A, Chen L, Johnston P, Santucci K. Positioning for lumbar puncture in children evaluated by bedside ultrasound. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1149-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0646. Epub 2010 Apr 19.

    PMID: 20403933BACKGROUND
  • Lo MD, Parisi MT, Brown JC, Klein EJ. Sitting or tilt position for infant lumbar puncture does not increase ultrasound measurements of lumbar subarachnoid space width. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 May;29(5):588-91. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828e630d.

    PMID: 23603648BACKGROUND
  • Oncel S, Gunlemez A, Anik Y, Alvur M. Positioning of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit for lumbar puncture as determined by bedside ultrasonography. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Mar;98(2):F133-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301475. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

    PMID: 22684159BACKGROUND
  • Shaikh F, Brzezinski J, Alexander S, Arzola C, Carvalho JC, Beyene J, Sung L. Ultrasound imaging for lumbar punctures and epidural catheterisations: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013 Mar 26;346:f1720. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1720.

    PMID: 23532866BACKGROUND
  • Bruccoleri RE, Chen L. Needle-entry angle for lumbar puncture in children as determined by using ultrasonography. Pediatrics. 2011 Apr;127(4):e921-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2511. Epub 2011 Mar 28.

    PMID: 21444601BACKGROUND
  • Bailie HC, Arthurs OJ, Murray MJ, Kelsall AW. Weight-based determination of spinal canal depth for paediatric lumbar punctures. Arch Dis Child. 2013 Nov;98(11):877-80. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303793. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

    PMID: 23966025BACKGROUND
  • Wilson DA, Prince JR. John Caffey award. MR imaging determination of the location of the normal conus medullaris throughout childhood. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 May;152(5):1029-32. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.5.1029.

    PMID: 2650477BACKGROUND
  • Hill CA, Gibson PJ. Ultrasound determination of the normal location of the conus medullaris in neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995 Mar;16(3):469-72.

    PMID: 7793365BACKGROUND
  • Wolf S, Schneble F, Troger J. The conus medullaris: time of ascendence to normal level. Pediatr Radiol. 1992;22(8):590-2. doi: 10.1007/BF02015359.

    PMID: 1491937BACKGROUND
  • Sahin F, Selcuki M, Ecin N, Zenciroglu A, Unlu A, Yilmaz F, Mavis N, Saribas S. Level of conus medullaris in term and preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Jul;77(1):F67-9. doi: 10.1136/fn.77.1.f67.

    PMID: 9279188BACKGROUND
  • Rozzelle CJ, Reed GT, Kirkman JL, Shannon CN, Chern JJ, Wellons JC 3rd, Tubbs RS. Sonographic determination of normal Conus Medullaris level and ascent in early infancy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014 Apr;30(4):655-8. doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2310-6. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

    PMID: 24178234BACKGROUND
  • Tame SJ, Burstal R. Investigation of the radiological relationship between iliac crests, conus medullaris and vertebral level in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003 Oct;13(8):676-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01120.x.

    PMID: 14535904BACKGROUND
  • Kesler H, Dias MS, Kalapos P. Termination of the normal conus medullaris in children: a whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23(2):E7. doi: 10.3171/FOC-07/08/E7.

    PMID: 17961006BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Ultrasonography

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Results Point of Contact

Title
Raquel Schrager
Organization
Columbia University Medical Center

Study Officials

  • David O Kessler, MD, MSc

    Columbia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Gerald Behr, MD

    Columbia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Peter S Dayan, MD, MSc

    Columbia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2015

First Posted

February 27, 2015

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion

July 1, 2016

Study Completion

July 1, 2016

Last Updated

October 24, 2023

Results First Posted

October 24, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations