NCT02321462

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that Eziclen is non-inferior to Fortrans® (the reference colonic lavage in Russia) administered in adult subjects scheduled to undergo colonoscopy for a routinely accepted diagnostic indication.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
296

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 22, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 27, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 4, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

December 17, 2014

Results QC Date

January 11, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 1, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

preparation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Adjusted Percentage of Patients With Successful Overall Colon Preparation, Assessed by the Global Score of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).

    The BBPS score for each colon segment (right, transverse and left colon) was assessed by 3 blinded experts as follows: 0=unprepared segment with mucosa not seen due to solid stool that cannot be cleared , 1=portion of mucosa of the segment seen, but other areas not well seen due to staining, residual stool and/or opaque liquid, 2=-minor amount of residual staining, small fragments of stool and/or opaque liquid, but mucosa of segment seen well, 3=entire mucosa of segment seen well with no residual staining, small fragments of stool and/or opaque liquid. A reconciled score based on the 3 blinded reviews was used to calculate the global BBPS score, ranging from 0 to 9 (worst to best). A successful overall colon preparation was defined as a global score ≥6 for the 3 colon segments. The percentage of patients with a successful preparation was determined using a logistic regression model, adjusted on centre, age class (\<= 65; \> 65), gender and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) status.

    Colonoscopy was performed on Day 2.

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Mean BBPS Score by Segment and Globally (ITT Population)

    Colonoscopy was performed on Day 2.

  • Mean BBPS Score for Right Colon and Transverse Colon Segment (PP Population)

    Colonoscopy was performed on Day 2.

  • The Percentage of Patients in Whom Lesions Were Detected.

    Colonoscopy was performed on Day 2.

  • The Percentage of Patients for Whom the Colonoscopy Was Completed

    Colonoscopy was performed on Day 2.

  • Mean Colonoscopy Duration

    Colonoscopy was performed on Day 2.

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Eziclen

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Eziclen

Fortrans®

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Fortrans®

Interventions

Eziclen solution administered orally as split-dose the day before and on the day of colonoscopy.

Eziclen

Fortrans® solution administered orally as split-dose the day before and on the day of colonoscopy.

Fortrans®

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Provision of written informed consent signed prior to any study related procedures
  • Male or female, at least 18 years old undergoing colonoscopy for a routine diagnostic indication:
  • Routine cancer screening
  • Polyp or neoplasm history
  • Diagnostic procedure for occult bleeding or anaemia
  • Diarrhoea or constipation of unknown aetiology
  • IBD if not in severe acute phase
  • Abnormal ultrasound exam (i.e. mass in abdomen)
  • Evaluation of barium enema or computed tomography (CT) scan results
  • In good clinical condition (physical exam and medical history)
  • Subjects with an adequate fluid balance, and adequate electrolyte balance (measured during screening K, Na, Cl, bicarbonate within normal/near normal range)

You may not qualify if:

  • Has abnormal baseline findings, any other medical condition(s) or laboratory findings that, in the opinion of the investigator, might jeopardise the subject's safety or decrease the chance of obtaining satisfactory data needed to achieve the objective(s) of the study.
  • Has an advanced carcinoma or any other colon disease leading to excessive mucosal fragility.
  • Has a known or suspected gastrointestinal (GI) obstruction, gastric retention, gastroparesis, or disorder of gastric emptying.
  • Has a known or suspected ileus.
  • Has a bowel perforation.
  • Has profuse vomiting.
  • Needs a therapeutic procedure (e.g. polypectomy, mucosectomy).
  • Has toxic colitis or megacolon.
  • Is in severe acute phases of active IBD, as a contraindication for colonoscopy.
  • Has acute GI bleeding.
  • Underwent previous GI surgeries (e.g. colostomy, colectomy, gastric bypass, stomach stapling).
  • Has impaired consciousness predisposing to pulmonary aspiration.
  • Needs a colonoscopy for foreign body removal and decompression.
  • Underwent previous incomplete colonoscopy.
  • Has a known severe renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2).
  • +11 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

State Healthcare Institution Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 31 of Moscow

Moscow, 119415, Russia

Location

Federal State Budgetary Institution "State Scientifical Center of Coloproctology"

Moscow, 123423, Russia

Location

State Healthcare Institution of Yaroslavl Region "Regional Clinical Cancer Hospital"

Yaroslavl, 150054, Russia

Location

Limitations and Caveats

The differences in the Safety and ITT populations were due to 3 drug administration deviations. 2 patients initially randomized in the Fortrans® group received Eziclen and 1 patient initially randomized in the Eziclen group received Fortrans® .

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Director
Organization
Ipsen Pharma

Study Officials

  • Ipsen Medical Director

    Ipsen

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2014

First Posted

December 22, 2014

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 4, 2019

Results First Posted

February 27, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Locations