Deep Neuromuscular Relaxation in Patients for Thoraco-laparoscopic Esophagectomy
DEPTH
A Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Trial Comparing the Effect of on Demand vs Deep Neuromuscular Relaxation on Rating of Surgical and Anesthesia Conditions in Patients Undergoing Thoraco-laparoscopic Esophagectomy
3 other identifiers
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: Endoscopic (thoraco-laparoscopic) esophageal surgery is a high risk procedure where the use of deep neuromuscular block (NMB) may increase field visibility and anaesthesia conditions. Under these conditions, boluses of muscle relaxants can be given on indication only OR by continuous infusion. We hypothesize that deep NMB by continuous infusion of rocuronium as compared to on demand bolus administration facilitates surgical and anesthesia conditions during thoraco-laparoscopic esophageal resection but higher doses of sugammadex are needed to reverse NMB at the end of surgery. Objective: Primary objective is to evaluate the use of deep muscle relaxation versus on indication only on surgical and anesthesia conditions in patients for endoscopic esophageal resection. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the (hypothetical) dose of sugammadex needed in both groups in an economical perspective and to compare the intra-operative cardiac and respiratory incidents and post-operative complication rate of both groups. Study design: a single-center randomized controlled double-blinded intervention study. Study population: All patients \> 18 years to undergo a thoracolaparoscopic esophageal resection.I Intervention: Patients are randomized to receive either continuous infusion of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg/hr (group 1) or continuous infusion of NaCl 0.9% 0.06 ml/kg/hr (group 2). On demand boluses of Rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg can be given in both groups. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome parameter of this study is the SRS during the abdominal phase of thoracolaparoscopic esophageal surgery. Secondary outcomes measured are SRS during the thoracic phase, the number of on demand boluses infused, the dose of Sugammadex needed in both groups to reach a TOF of \> 90%, duration of surgery, a cost-analysis, the incidence of intra-operative cardiac and respiratory incidents and the ability of surgeons to estimate which neuromuscular blocking regime was given to the patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 19, 2016
September 1, 2016
1.6 years
December 12, 2014
September 16, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rating of surgical conditions (SRS) during the abdominal phase of the operation.
during operation
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Rating of SRS during thoracic phase of the operation.
during operation
Number of on demand boluses infused, indication of on demand bolus administration
during operation
Rating of anesthesia conditions
during operation
Costs (euro's) associated with use of Rocuronium, Sugammadex, operation time and length of stay ICU.
during operation and an average of 4 weeks thereafter
Number of correct estimates of group randomization by surgeons
directly after operation
Other Outcomes (5)
length of stay ICU/PACU
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
need for re-intubation
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
post-operative surgical complications
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
deep neuromuscular relaxation
ACTIVE COMPARATORcontinuous infusion of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg/hr (group 1). On demand bolus rocuronium can be given if demanded by anesthesiologist or surgeon
on demand neuromuscular relaxation
NO INTERVENTIONcontinuous infusion of NaCl 0.9% 0.06 ml/kg/hr (group 2) On demand bolus of Rocuronium will be given when demanded by anesthesiologist or surgeon.
Interventions
Rocuronium given continuously to reach deep neuromuscular block
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients, undergoing elective thoraco-laparoscopic esophageal resection (either Ivor Lewis or McKeown variant)
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
- Known allergies for aminosteroid-type muscle relaxants or sugammadex.
- Severe kidney dysfunction (GFR \< 30), patients on dialysis
- Liver function disorders
- Myasthenia Gravis or other (neuro)muscular diseases
- Patients with carcinomatosis
- Use of anti-epileptics and lithium or drugs containing Kinin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Academic Medical Center
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
Related Publications (2)
Veelo DP, Gisbertz SS, Binnekade JM, Hannivoort RA, Bosman JA, Geerts BF, Blobner M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Hollmann MW. On-demand versus continuous rocuronium infusion for deep neuromuscular relaxation in patients undergoing thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy: a randomized-controlled clinical trial (DEPTH). Can J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;66(9):1062-1074. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01373-0. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
PMID: 31025258DERIVEDVeelo DP, Gisbertz SS, Hannivoort RA, van Dieren S, Geerts BF, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Hollmann MW. The effect of on-demand vs deep neuromuscular relaxation on rating of surgical and anaesthesiologic conditions in patients undergoing thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (DEPTH trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Aug 5;16:331. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0849-0.
PMID: 26242177DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Markus W Hollmann, prof
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Denise P Veelo, MD, PhD
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2014
First Posted
December 19, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 19, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09