NCT02319174

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to help make a lower cost automatic blood pressure monitor device for diagnosis and monitoring of pre-eclampsia in pregnant women, where automatic blood pressure monitoring is limited or not available. The study will compare this low cost device to a commercially available system used for pre-eclamptic women in many United States hospitals that the investigators will be bringing to Malawi as a part of this study. The team hopes to show that this lower cost blood pressure machine works well and can help women with pre-eclampsia. The study also aims to see if this machine is easy for the nurse to use. 70 pregnant women who are either at-risk or diagnosed with pre-eclampsia will be enrolled at University of Texas Health Science Center Houston. Patient arm circumference will be measured with measurement tape. They will be seated upright in a comfortable chair with arm at heart level and an arm blood pressure cuff from either the automatic blood pressure monitor or a manual sphygmomanometer will be placed on the left arm. The cuff will be inflated and then deflated until measurement concludes. Heart rate will be measured with tactile arterial palpation.The process will be repeated for a total of up to nine measurements, alternating between measurements with the automatic blood pressure monitor and the manual sphygmomanometer. There will be a waiting period of 45-60 seconds between each measurement. The results of this study will help researchers understand the performance and usability of this device in Malawi and help decide if any design changes are needed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
43

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 10, 2014

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 18, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2015

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 4, 2016

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 19, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

December 10, 2014

Results QC Date

June 24, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 17, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Accuracy of Blood Pressure Readings by Sphygmo

    Mean difference of systolic and diastolic blood pressures between Sphygmo blood pressure measurements and measurements from the gold standard sphygmomanometer.

    Blood pressure was measured an average of 9 times for each participant and the average of these measurements was recorded. Each measurement period lasted approximately 30-45 minutes

  • Percent of Sphygmo Readings That Were Within 5mmHg, 10mmHg, and 15mmHg of the Readings by the Gold Standard Sphygmomanometer.

    The British Hypertension society defines a specific criteria for the accuracy of a sphygmomanometer. Devices are graded according to the cumulative percentage of readings that have an absolute difference between the more favorable observer's mercury sphygmomanometer readings and the test device of \< 5 mmHg, \< 10 mmHg, and \< 15 mmHg. A letter grade of "A" requires that over 60%, 85%, and 95% were achieved in the \< 5 mmHg, \< 10 mmHg, and \<15 mmHg categories, respectively. A letter grade of "B" requires that over 50%, 75%, and 90% were achieved in the \< 5 mmHg, \< 10 mmHg, and \<15 mmHg categories, respectively. The test device achieved a grade of (A/A) with the validation data from this study.

    Blood pressure was measured an average of 9 times for each participant during their single measurement period, and the average of those measurements was recorded. Each measurement period lasted approximately 30-45 minutes

Study Arms (1)

Sphygmo

EXPERIMENTAL

All subjects will have blood pressure measured by both the research device (Sphygmo) and the commercially available device. All clinical decisions will be made using measurements from the commercially available device.

Device: Sphygmo

Interventions

SphygmoDEVICE

A team of engineers from Rice University has recently developed Sphygmo, an ambulatory, low-cost blood pressure monitor for use in the diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia in low-resource hospitals

Sphygmo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Pregnant women receiving antenatal care at the UT OB/GYN clinic.
  • Over the age of 18

You may not qualify if:

  • Women under the age of 18
  • Women unable to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Texas Health Science Center Houston

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Natarajan P, Shennan AH, Penny J, Halligan AW, de Swiet M, Anthony J. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov;181(5 Pt 1):1203-10. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70109-2.

    PMID: 10561646BACKGROUND
  • Turner JA. Diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia: an update. Int J Womens Health. 2010 Sep 30;2:327-37. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S8550.

    PMID: 21151680BACKGROUND
  • Dekker G, Sibai B. Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2001 Jan 20;357(9251):209-15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03599-6.

    PMID: 11213110BACKGROUND
  • Magee LA, Abalos E, von Dadelszen P, Sibai B, Easterling T, Walkinshaw S; CHIPS Study Group. How to manage hypertension in pregnancy effectively. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Sep;72(3):394-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04002.x.

    PMID: 21545480BACKGROUND
  • De Greeff A, Ghosh D, Anthony J, Shennan A. Accuracy assessment of the Dinamap ProCare 400 in pregnancy and preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2010 Jan;29(2):198-205. doi: 10.3109/10641950902968650.

    PMID: 20367507BACKGROUND
  • O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, de Swiet M, Padfield PL, Altman DG, Bland M, Coats A, Atkins N. An outline of the revised British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens. 1993 Jun;11(6):677-9. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199306000-00013. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8397248BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pre-Eclampsia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Organization
Rice 360: Institute for Global Health

Study Officials

  • Rebecca R Kortum, PhD

    William Marsh Rice University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DEVICE FEASIBILITY
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Stanley C. Moore Professor of Bioengineering

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2014

First Posted

December 18, 2014

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2015

Study Completion

November 4, 2016

Last Updated

December 19, 2018

Results First Posted

December 19, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-12

Locations