Foley Catheter Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
TRANSCERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER (FOLEY) Versus INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND INDUCTION OF LABOR: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL.
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of balloon dilatation (Foley) with vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. METHOD: a randomized clinical assay has been performed with 160 women with indication of induction of labor, randomly divided in two groups, 80 for Foley catheter and 80 for misoprostol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2006
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2010
CompletedJune 10, 2010
September 1, 2009
2.2 years
June 8, 2010
June 9, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cervical ripening
Foley Group: catheter stay no more that 48 hours. Every 6 hours vaginal exam was performed. The cases on Bishop score increase or occurred spontaneous exit of catheter or spontaneous labour had been initiated are considered success.The failure was adopted if after48 hours occurred no cervical modifications. Misoprostol group: was introduced 25 microgram every 6 hour (max 200microg)if cervical conditions were unchanged. In the case of cervical evolution or start of labour the method was considered success.The failure was adopted if after 48 there was no cervical modifications.
48 hous after start the method
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Cesarean
The action of methods were assessed for 48 hours after start.
Need of oxytocin
48 hours after start method
need of neonatal intensive care
7 first days after birth
Study Arms (2)
Misoprostol
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse 25 micrograms vaginal every 6 hours (max dosis 200 micrograms in 48 hours)
Foley
ACTIVE COMPARATORFoley catheter number 14 or 16 was installed intracervical for no more than 48 hours.
Interventions
Vaginal application of 25 micrograms every 6 hours until cervical ripening reach Bishop 6 or more
After Foley introduction, every 6 hours vaginal exam was performed. The cases on Bishop score increase or occurred spontaneous exit of catheter or spontaneous labour had been initiated are considered success.The failure was adopted if after48 hours occurred no cervical modifications.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Gestational age from 37 weeks,
- feto unic, alive and cephalic,
- Bishop index equal or lesser than four.
You may not qualify if:
- uterine scar,
- premature rupture of the membranes,
- fetal weight bigger than 4000 g,
- previous placenta,
- conditions that imposed the immediate ending of the gestation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MHVNCachoeirinha
São Paulo, São Paulo, 02720-200, Brazil
Related Publications (3)
Sciscione AC, Muench M, Pollock M, Jenkins TM, Tildon-Burton J, Colmorgen GH. Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):751-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01579-4.
PMID: 11704164BACKGROUNDAfolabi BB, Oyeneyin OL, Ogedengbe OK. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;89(3):263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.02.010. Epub 2005 Apr 2.
PMID: 15919393BACKGROUNDBoulvain M, Kelly A, Lohse C, Stan C, Irion O. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.
PMID: 11687101BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nelson Sass, pHD
Maternidade Escola de Vila Nova Cachoeirinha
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2010
First Posted
June 10, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
January 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 10, 2010
Record last verified: 2009-09