NCT02312154

Brief Summary

IMPORTANCE Skin rejuvenation can be achieved effectively and safely by injection of a stabilized hyaluronic acid (HA)-based gel of nonanimal origin (NASHA) injection using a stamp-type electronic multineedle injector. OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and safety of NASHA using a stamp-type electronic multineedle injector, and if changes in skin physiology occur earlier than in previous trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Twenty-five patients were recruited to this single-center, evaluator-blinded, prospective, balanced (1:1), split-face randomized clinical trial.One dermatologist who was blinded as to the treatment side evaluated the skin hydration, melanin content, erythema, and elasticity of both cheeks using a corneometer, a mexameter, and a reviscometer, respectively, at each follow-up visit (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postinjection). The subjects and two independent investigators assessed the clinical improvement using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at the every visit. Twenty-four participants completed the study, and no participants withdrew due to adverse effects. INTERVENTIONS Each participant submitted to a single treatment with a NASHA injection to one side of the lower cheek. The cheek side to which the treatment was applied was chosen randomly.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2014

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 5, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 24, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

April 3, 2015

Status Verified

March 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

December 5, 2014

Results QC Date

December 9, 2014

Last Update Submit

March 16, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Hydration Level

    We measured a hydration level by a corneometer device (Courage \& Khazaka, Cologne, Germany). The range of hydration level was 0 (as dry as possible) \~120 AU (Arbitrary Unit)(most moist possible)

    12 weeks

  • Elasticity

    We measured a elasticity by a reviscometer device (Courage \& Khazaka, Cologne, Germany). The range of elasticity was 0 (most elastic possible as) \~400 AU(Arbitrary Unit) (inelastic as possible)

    12 weeks

  • Melanin Index

    We measured a melanin index by a mexameter device (Courage \& Khazaka, Cologne, Germany). The range of melanin index was 0 (as bright as possible) \~999 AU (Arbitrary Unit) (most dark possible).

    12 weeks

  • Erythema Index

    We measured an erythema index by a mexameter device (Courage \& Khazaka, Cologne, Germany). The range of erythema index is 0\~999 AU(Arbitrary Unit). The range of erythema index was 0 (as non-erythematous as possible) \~999 AU (most erythematous possible)

    12 weeks

  • Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (Investigator)

    The therapeutic outcome was assessed by investigator using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), which rates outcome on the following 5-point scale: 3, very much improved; 2, much improved; 1, improved; 0, no change; and -1, worse.

    12 weeks

  • Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (Subject)

    The therapeutic outcome was assessed by patient self-assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), which rates outcome on the following 5-point scale: 3, very much improved; 2, much improved; 1, improved; 0, no change; and -1, worse

    12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

treated side (Restylane vital)

EXPERIMENTAL

We injected staabilized hyaluronic acid (HA)-based gel of nonanimal origin on the left side of face. (We performed split face study)

Device: Restylane Vital

untreated side (control)

NO INTERVENTION

We did nothing on the right side of face and we compared the results on same participants

Interventions

stabilized hyaluronic acid (HA)-based gel of nonanimal origin

treated side (Restylane vital)

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy people older than 25 years

You may not qualify if:

  • known hypersensitivity to HA, an active skin disease, any autoimmune disorder, or significant renal, hepatic, or other medical diseases

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (17)

  • Gniadecka M, Nielsen OF, Wessel S, Heidenheim M, Christensen DH, Wulf HC. Water and protein structure in photoaged and chronically aged skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1998 Dec;111(6):1129-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00430.x.

    PMID: 9856828BACKGROUND
  • Matarasso SL, Carruthers JD, Jewell ML; Restylane Consensus Group. Consensus recommendations for soft-tissue augmentation with nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid (Restylane). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Mar;117(3 Suppl):3S-34S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000204759.76865.39.

    PMID: 16531934BACKGROUND
  • Kerscher M, Bayrhammer J, Reuther T. Rejuvenating influence of a stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of nonanimal origin on facial skin aging. Dermatol Surg. 2008 May;34(5):720-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34176.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

    PMID: 18384619BACKGROUND
  • Streker M, Reuther T, Krueger N, Kerscher M. Stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of non-animal origin for skin rejuvenation: face, hand, and decolletage. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Sep;12(9):990-4.

    PMID: 24002145BACKGROUND
  • Naylor EC, Watson RE, Sherratt MJ. Molecular aspects of skin ageing. Maturitas. 2011 Jul;69(3):249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 May 25.

    PMID: 21612880BACKGROUND
  • Distante F, Pagani V, Bonfigli A. Stabilized hyaluronic acid of non-animal origin for rejuvenating the skin of the upper arm. Dermatol Surg. 2009 Feb;35 Suppl 1:389-93; discussion 394. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.01051.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19207331BACKGROUND
  • Williams S, Tamburic S, Stensvik H, Weber M. Changes in skin physiology and clinical appearance after microdroplet placement of hyaluronic acid in aging hands. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009 Sep;8(3):216-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2009.00447.x.

    PMID: 19735521BACKGROUND
  • Reuther T, Bayrhammer J, Kerscher M. Effects of a three-session skin rejuvenation treatment using stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of non-animal origin on skin elasticity: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol Res. 2010 Jan;302(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s00403-009-0988-9.

    PMID: 19730872BACKGROUND
  • Ribe A, Ribe N. Neck skin rejuvenation: histological and clinical changes after combined therapy with a fractional non-ablative laser and stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of non-animal origin. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011 Aug;13(4):154-61. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2011.594060. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

    PMID: 21699363BACKGROUND
  • Tezel A, Fredrickson GH. The science of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008 Mar;10(1):35-42. doi: 10.1080/14764170701774901.

    PMID: 18330796BACKGROUND
  • Wang F, Garza LA, Kang S, Varani J, Orringer JS, Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ. In vivo stimulation of de novo collagen production caused by cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections in photodamaged human skin. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Feb;143(2):155-63. doi: 10.1001/archderm.143.2.155.

    PMID: 17309996BACKGROUND
  • Alam M, Han S, Pongprutthipan M, Disphanurat W, Kakar R, Nodzenski M, Pace N, Kim N, Yoo S, Veledar E, Poon E, West DP. Efficacy of a needling device for the treatment of acne scars: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Aug;150(8):844-9. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.8687.

    PMID: 24919799BACKGROUND
  • Kim SE, Lee JH, Kwon HB, Ahn BJ, Lee AY. Greater collagen deposition with the microneedle therapy system than with intense pulsed light. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):336-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01882.x. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

    PMID: 21342311BACKGROUND
  • Lim HK, Suh DH, Lee SJ, Shin MK. Rejuvenation effects of hyaluronic acid injection on nasojugal groove: prospective randomized split face clinical controlled study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014 Jan;16(1):32-6. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2013.854620. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

    PMID: 24245880BACKGROUND
  • Bachmann F, Erdmann R, Hartmann V, Wiest L, Rzany B. The spectrum of adverse reactions after treatment with injectable fillers in the glabellar region: results from the Injectable Filler Safety Study. Dermatol Surg. 2009 Oct;35 Suppl 2:1629-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01341.x.

    PMID: 19807757BACKGROUND
  • Kassir R, Kolluru A, Kassir M. Extensive necrosis after injection of hyaluronic acid filler: case report and review of the literature. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2011 Sep;10(3):224-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00562.x.

    PMID: 21896135BACKGROUND
  • Roh NK, Kim MJ, Lee YW, Choe YB, Ahn KJ. A Split-Face Study of the Effects of a Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid-Based Gel of Nonanimal Origin for Facial Skin Rejuvenation Using a Stamp-Type Multineedle Injector: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):809-816. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000480686.68275.60.

Limitations and Caveats

First, it did not have a double-blind design, and so the GAIS scores of the subjects could have been influenced. Second, the posttreatment follow-up period was relatively short, at 12 weeks. Finally, the patient sample in this study was small.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Yang Won Lee
Organization
Konkuk University

Study Officials

  • Yang Won Lee, MD, PhD

    Department of Dermatology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2014

First Posted

December 9, 2014

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion

July 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

April 3, 2015

Results First Posted

February 24, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-03