rTMS for Executive Function Deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Executive Function Deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Effects on Brain Structure: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators will be examining the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on executive function deficits in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Half of the participants will be chosen by chance to receive active rTMS stimulation while half will be chosen by chance to receive sham rTMS. Sham rTMS will feel the same as active rTMS only there will be no direct brain stimulation. This is necessary to ensure that active rTMS is efficacious in the enhancement of executive function in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Based on results from a recently published pilot study, the investigators propose that active rTMS treatment will result in a significant improvement in working memory performance compared to sham rTMS treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 4, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 4, 2018
CompletedMarch 6, 2019
March 1, 2019
3.6 years
November 25, 2014
March 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in accuracy on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) Spatial Working Memory Task
Specifically the investigators will evaluate the changes in spatial working memory scores before and after rTMS treatment.
Baseline; Post rTMS (4 weeks after baseline); One month follow up ( 4 weeks after post rTMS); 6 month follow up (post rTMS); One year follow up (post rTMS)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in scores on Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning (A) (BRIEF) (A)
Baseline; Post rTMS (4 weeks after baseline); One month follow up ( 4 weeks after post rTMS); 6 month follow up (post rTMS); One year follow up (post rTMS)
Study Arms (2)
Active rTMS
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive treatment will be delivered at an intensity that is 90% of the resting motor threshold (RMT). Stimulation will be delivered at 20 Hz with 25 simulation trains of 30 stimuli each (i.e., 750 stimuli) and an intertrain interval of 30 sec. Treatment will be applied in sequential order bilaterally to the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The order of bilateral stimulation (i.e. right then left or left than right) will be held constant for all 20 treatments. Intervention: Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Sham rTMS
SHAM COMPARATORSham stimulation will be delivered using the same stimulation parameters and at the site of active treatment, but with only the side-edge resting on the scalp. The coil will be angled 45 degrees way from the skull in a single-wing tilt position. This method produces sound and some somatic sensation (e.g. contraction of scalp muscles) similar to those of active stimulation, but with minimal direct brain effects. Intervention: Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Interventions
rTMS is a non-invasive procedure involving the use of magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Are fluent in the English language
- Have a diagnosis of high functioning ASD (HF-ASD) (i.e., are verbal with an Intelligence Quotient (IQ) ≥ 70)
- Are competent to consent based on the subjects' ability to provide a spontaneous narrative description of the key elements of the study
- Are clinically stable as determined by their treating physician, with no medication changes over the past 4 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- Have a history of substance abuse or dependence in the last 6 months or have a positive urine toxicology screen
- Have a concomitant major medical or neurologic illness
- Have had a seizure in the past, or have a first-degree relative with epilepsy
- Have an abnormal clinical EEG
- Are pregnant or likely to get pregnant during the next 4 weeks
- Are clinically unstable
- Are on benzodiazepines or anticonvulsant medication
- Have a history of rTMS treatment.
- Are fluent in the English language
- Competent to consent
- Have a history of substance abuse or dependence in the last 6 months or have a positive urine toxicology screen
- Have a major medical or neurologic illness
- Have a diagnosed learning disorder or impaired academic or adaptive functioning on history
- Are pregnant
- Have an IQ \< 80
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre for Addictions and Mental Health
Toronto, Ontario, M6J 1H4, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Moxon-Emre I, Daskalakis ZJ, Blumberger DM, Croarkin PE, Lyon RE, Forde NJ, Tani H, Truong P, Lai MC, Desarkar P, Sailasuta N, Szatmari P, Ameis SH. Modulation of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Glutamate/Glutamine Levels Following Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Young Adults With Autism. Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 6;15:711542. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.711542. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34690671DERIVEDAmeis SH, Blumberger DM, Croarkin PE, Mabbott DJ, Lai MC, Desarkar P, Szatmari P, Daskalakis ZJ. Treatment of Executive Function Deficits in autism spectrum disorder with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A double-blind, sham-controlled, pilot trial. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):539-547. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
PMID: 32289673DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephanie H Ameis, M.D., M.S.C
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinician Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2014
First Posted
December 8, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 4, 2018
Study Completion
May 4, 2018
Last Updated
March 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share