NCT02311673

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a once daily subcutaneous injectable formulation of setmelanotide in obese participants with Prader-Willi syndrome on tolerability, weight loss, and hyperphagia-related behavior. The study drug (setmelanotide and placebo) was administered in a blinded fashion.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2014

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 19, 2015

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 26, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 26, 2016

Completed
6.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 27, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 27, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

November 25, 2014

Results QC Date

May 18, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 6, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Prader-Willi Syndromeobesityhyperphagia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) - Period 2

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death; * Was life-threatening; * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect

    Days 15 to 41

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 3

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death; * Was life-threatening; * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect

    Days 42 to 55

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 4

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death; * Was life-threatening; * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect

    Days 56 to 69

  • Mean Body Weight - Period 2

    Baseline (Day 15)

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 2

    Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

  • Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2

    The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia).

    Baseline (Day 15)

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2

    The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.

    Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

Secondary Outcomes (19)

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Drive Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2

    Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Behaviors Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2

    Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Severity Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2

    Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 3

    Baseline (Day 42) and Day 56

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 4

    Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70

  • +14 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Setmelanotide 0.5 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received setmelanotide 0.5 milligrams (mg) once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period) and Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period).

Drug: Setmelanotide

Setmelanotide 1.5 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received setmelanotide 1.5 once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period), and Day 56 to Day 69 (optional 2-week, open-label extension period).

Drug: Setmelanotide

Setmelanotide 2.5 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received setmelanotide 2.5 once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period), and Day 56 to Day 69 (optional 2-week, open-label extension period).

Drug: Setmelanotide

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants received placebo matched to setmelanotide once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 1 to Day 14 (2-week, single-blind run-in period), Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), and Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period).

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

subcutaneous injection

Also known as: RM-493
Setmelanotide 0.5 mgSetmelanotide 1.5 mgSetmelanotide 2.5 mg

Subcutaneous injection

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • PWS due to chromosome 15 micro-deletion, maternal uniparental disomy, or imprinting defect, confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray, and/or methylation studies. Obese male or female participants weighing at least 50 kilograms (kg) with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kilogram per square meter (kg/m²)
  • Age 16-65 years
  • If a participant has diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, following criteria must be met:
  • hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) \< 7.5% not being managed with insulin. Participants taking glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues (exenatide or liraglutide) must have been on stable dose for greater than 3 months.
  • Fasting plasma glucose \< 140 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
  • No history of ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma
  • Vital signs must be within the following ranges and stable.
  • Systolic blood pressure, 90-150 millimeter of mercury (mm Hg)
  • Diastolic blood pressure, 50-90 mm Hg
  • Pulse rate, 40-100 beats per minute (bpm)
  • Stable body weight at home for approximately 2 months (self or guardian-reported loss/gain within ± 5%).
  • Blood pressure (≤ 150/90 mmHg); may include stable dose (≥ 30 days of use) of up to two anti-hypertensive medications that are intended to remain on a stable dose during the protocol
  • Parent or guardian is able to communicate well with the investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and be able to understand and sign the written informed consent. Due to the significant intellectual disability with PWS, assent is to be provided by the participant who cannot consent for himself or herself.
  • Results of screening clinical laboratory tests (complete blood count with differential and platelets and chemistry profile) must be within normal range or, if outside of the normal range, must be accepted by the investigator and sponsor as not clinically significant.
  • Females of non-childbearing potential, defined as surgically sterile (status post hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation) or post-menopausal for at least 12 months (and confirmed with a screening follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the post-menopausal lab range), do not require contraception during the study. All other females of child-bearing potential must agree to use contraception as outlined in the protocol.
  • +2 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Recent use (within 3 month) of weight loss agents including herbal medication.
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder or other Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III) disorders which the investigator believes will interfere significantly with study compliance.
  • A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of ≥ 15.
  • Any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
  • Clinically significant illness in the 8 weeks before screening.
  • History of clinically significant bleeding disorders.
  • Current, clinically significant liver, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, oncologic, or gastrointestinal disease.
  • Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus or other active endocrine disorders (e.g., Cushing syndrome, or thyroid dysfunction except if on adequate thyroid or glucocorticoid replacement supplement).
  • Cardiovascular disease event including history of congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, second degree or greater heart block or prolonged QT syndrome.
  • Blood pressure \> 150/90 mm Hg.
  • Liver disease or liver injury as indicated by abnormal liver function tests, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, or serum bilirubin (\> 1.5 x upper limit of normal for any of these tests) or history of hepatic cirrhosis.
  • History or presence of impaired renal function as indicated by clinically significantly abnormal creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, or urinary constituents (e.g., albuminuria) or moderate to severe renal dysfunction as defined by the Cockcroft-Gault equation (\< 50 mL/min).
  • History or close family history (parents or siblings) of melanoma.
  • Oculocutaneous albinism (occurs at approximately 1% in PWS).
  • Significant dermatologic findings as part of the Screening comprehensive skin evaluation performed by the dermatologist.
  • +10 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

University of California Irvine

Irvine, California, 92617, United States

Location

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States

Location

Kansas University Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States

Location

Winthrop University Hospital

Mineola, New York, 11501, United States

Location

Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prader-Willi SyndromeObesityHyperphagia

Interventions

setmelanotide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intellectual DisabilityNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAbnormalities, MultipleCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesChromosome DisordersGenetic Diseases, InbornImprinting DisordersOverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, Digestive

Results Point of Contact

Title
Rhythm Clinical Trials
Organization
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Study Officials

  • David Meeker

    Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2014

First Posted

December 8, 2014

Study Start

March 19, 2015

Primary Completion

October 26, 2016

Study Completion

October 26, 2016

Last Updated

July 27, 2023

Results First Posted

July 27, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations