Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Setmelanotide (RM-493) in Obese Participants With Prader-Willi Syndrome
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Pilot Study to Assess the Effects of RM-493, a Melanocortin 4 Receptor (MC4R) Agonist, in Obese Subjects With Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) on Safety, Weight Reduction, and Food-Related Behaviors
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a once daily subcutaneous injectable formulation of setmelanotide in obese participants with Prader-Willi syndrome on tolerability, weight loss, and hyperphagia-related behavior. The study drug (setmelanotide and placebo) was administered in a blinded fashion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Mar 2015
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 19, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 26, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 26, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 27, 2023
CompletedJuly 27, 2023
July 1, 2023
1.6 years
November 25, 2014
May 18, 2023
July 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) - Period 2
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death; * Was life-threatening; * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Days 15 to 41
Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 3
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death; * Was life-threatening; * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Days 42 to 55
Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 4
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death; * Was life-threatening; * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Days 56 to 69
Mean Body Weight - Period 2
Baseline (Day 15)
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 2
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia).
Baseline (Day 15)
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Drive Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Behaviors Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Severity Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 3
Baseline (Day 42) and Day 56
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 4
Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Setmelanotide 0.5 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received setmelanotide 0.5 milligrams (mg) once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period) and Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period).
Setmelanotide 1.5 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received setmelanotide 1.5 once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period), and Day 56 to Day 69 (optional 2-week, open-label extension period).
Setmelanotide 2.5 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received setmelanotide 2.5 once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period), and Day 56 to Day 69 (optional 2-week, open-label extension period).
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received placebo matched to setmelanotide once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 1 to Day 14 (2-week, single-blind run-in period), Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), and Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period).
Interventions
subcutaneous injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- PWS due to chromosome 15 micro-deletion, maternal uniparental disomy, or imprinting defect, confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray, and/or methylation studies. Obese male or female participants weighing at least 50 kilograms (kg) with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kilogram per square meter (kg/m²)
- Age 16-65 years
- If a participant has diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, following criteria must be met:
- hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) \< 7.5% not being managed with insulin. Participants taking glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues (exenatide or liraglutide) must have been on stable dose for greater than 3 months.
- Fasting plasma glucose \< 140 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
- No history of ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma
- Vital signs must be within the following ranges and stable.
- Systolic blood pressure, 90-150 millimeter of mercury (mm Hg)
- Diastolic blood pressure, 50-90 mm Hg
- Pulse rate, 40-100 beats per minute (bpm)
- Stable body weight at home for approximately 2 months (self or guardian-reported loss/gain within ± 5%).
- Blood pressure (≤ 150/90 mmHg); may include stable dose (≥ 30 days of use) of up to two anti-hypertensive medications that are intended to remain on a stable dose during the protocol
- Parent or guardian is able to communicate well with the investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and be able to understand and sign the written informed consent. Due to the significant intellectual disability with PWS, assent is to be provided by the participant who cannot consent for himself or herself.
- Results of screening clinical laboratory tests (complete blood count with differential and platelets and chemistry profile) must be within normal range or, if outside of the normal range, must be accepted by the investigator and sponsor as not clinically significant.
- Females of non-childbearing potential, defined as surgically sterile (status post hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation) or post-menopausal for at least 12 months (and confirmed with a screening follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the post-menopausal lab range), do not require contraception during the study. All other females of child-bearing potential must agree to use contraception as outlined in the protocol.
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Recent use (within 3 month) of weight loss agents including herbal medication.
- Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder or other Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III) disorders which the investigator believes will interfere significantly with study compliance.
- A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of ≥ 15.
- Any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
- Clinically significant illness in the 8 weeks before screening.
- History of clinically significant bleeding disorders.
- Current, clinically significant liver, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, oncologic, or gastrointestinal disease.
- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus or other active endocrine disorders (e.g., Cushing syndrome, or thyroid dysfunction except if on adequate thyroid or glucocorticoid replacement supplement).
- Cardiovascular disease event including history of congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, second degree or greater heart block or prolonged QT syndrome.
- Blood pressure \> 150/90 mm Hg.
- Liver disease or liver injury as indicated by abnormal liver function tests, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, or serum bilirubin (\> 1.5 x upper limit of normal for any of these tests) or history of hepatic cirrhosis.
- History or presence of impaired renal function as indicated by clinically significantly abnormal creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, or urinary constituents (e.g., albuminuria) or moderate to severe renal dysfunction as defined by the Cockcroft-Gault equation (\< 50 mL/min).
- History or close family history (parents or siblings) of melanoma.
- Oculocutaneous albinism (occurs at approximately 1% in PWS).
- Significant dermatologic findings as part of the Screening comprehensive skin evaluation performed by the dermatologist.
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
University of California Irvine
Irvine, California, 92617, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Kansas University Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
Winthrop University Hospital
Mineola, New York, 11501, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Rhythm Clinical Trials
- Organization
- Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
David Meeker
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2014
First Posted
December 8, 2014
Study Start
March 19, 2015
Primary Completion
October 26, 2016
Study Completion
October 26, 2016
Last Updated
July 27, 2023
Results First Posted
July 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share