Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
346
1 country
1
Brief Summary
External beam radiotherapy (RT) is one of the standard curative treatment options for patients with prostate cancer (PC). Several randomised trials have shown excellent long-term biochemical outcome with higher radiation doses. Nowadays, RT for PC commonly consists of delivering 74-80 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, resulting in an overall treatment time of 7-8 weeks. The sensitivity of different tissues to fractionation changes can be quantified through the alpha/beta ratio in the linear-quadratic model. Dose-response analysis of PC patients treated with both external beam RT and brachytherapy has led to the hypothesis that the alpha/beta ratio of PC is lower than for most other tumors and approaches a value characteristic of late responding tissues. Values between 1.2 and 3.9 Gy have been calculated. If the alpha/beta ratio of PC is indeed low, then hypofractionating RT treatments can theoretically maintain high bioequivalent tumor doses, shorten overall treatment time and decrease late toxicities.The advantages in terms of patient convenience and treatment cost are obvious. There is level I evidence that shows that hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules have at least equivalent biochemical outcome with only a small increase in acute but not late toxicity when compared to conventional fractionation RT schedules. Results on different hypofractionation schedules have been reported, however the optimal hypofractionation is not clear so far. In this randomised trial we would like to compare 2 different radiotherapyschedules: 16 fractions à rato of 4 fractions a week versus 25 fractions à rato of 5 fractions a week. The incidence on acute toxicity and early late toxicity (i.e. within 2 year post radiotherapy) and the impact on quality of life will be registrated and compared. The study will be performed in 2 stages. For stage 1, sample size was calculated to rule out an upper limit of 40% of patients with RTOG grade 2 or worse bowel (GI) complications with an expected rate of 25%, based on a one-stage Fleming-A'Hern design. A power of 83.0% (alpha level 0.038 one-sided) was obtained when including 72 patients per group (144 patients in total). If 22 or more patients out of 72 had grade 2 or worse GI complications, then the study arm was to be rejected. To allow for a dropout of 10%, 160 patients were included in stage 1. Sample size for stage 2 was calculated analogously allowing ruling out an upper limit of 35% of patients with RTOG grade 2 or worse GI complications with an expected rate of 25%. When including 155 patients per group (310 in total) a power of 85.7% (alpha level 0.049 one-sided) was obtained. If 45 or more patients out of 155 had grade 2 or worse GI complications, then the study arm was to be rejected. The sample size for stage 1 and stage 2 combined was set at 346 (173 per group), with a 10% allowance for dropout.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 prostate-cancer
Started Jun 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_2 prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 14, 2020
CompletedDecember 29, 2022
December 1, 2022
7 years
July 24, 2013
December 26, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in acute and early late toxicity
A maximal incidence of 40% of Grade 2 gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity is allowed. Evaluation of difference in grade 2 and 3 GI toxicity. Evaluation based on an in house developed toxicity scoring system based on RTOG/ CTC and SOMA-LENT
pre radiotherapy, weekly during radiotherapy, At 1, 3 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months post radiotherapy
Secondary Outcomes (2)
change in Quality of life
pre radiotherapy, weekly during radiotherapy, At 1, 3 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months post radiotherapy
cost-effectiveness
post radiotherapy
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1
EXPERIMENTAL16 fractions à rato of 4 fractions a week over 4 weeks
Arm 2
EXPERIMENTAL25 fractions à rato of 5 fractions a week over 5 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with T1-4 N0 M0 prostate cancer
You may not qualify if:
- other no skin cancer diagnosed within 5 years prior to enrolment
- no informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2013
First Posted
December 8, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 14, 2020
Study Completion
June 14, 2020
Last Updated
December 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12