NCT01921803

Brief Summary

External beam radiotherapy (RT) is one of the standard curative treatment options for patients with prostate cancer (PC). Several randomised trials have shown excellent long-term biochemical outcome with higher radiation doses. Nowadays, RT for PC commonly consists of delivering 74-80 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, resulting in an overall treatment time of 7-8 weeks. The sensitivity of different tissues to fractionation changes can be quantified through the α/β ratio in the linear-quadratic model. Dose-response analysis of PC patients treated with both external beam RT and brachytherapy has led to the hypothesis that the α/β ratio of PC is lower than for most other tumors and approaches a value characteristic of late responding tissues. Values between 1.2 and 3.9 Gy have been calculated. If the α/β ratio of PC is indeed low, then hypofractionating RT treatments can theoretically maintain high bioequivalent tumor doses, shorten overall treatment time and decrease late toxicities.The advantages in terms of patient convenience and treatment cost are obvious. There is level I evidence that shows that hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules have at least equivalent biochemical outcome with only a small increase in acute but not late toxicity when compared to conventional fractionation RT schedules. Results on different hypofractionation schedules have been reported, however the optimal hypofractionation is not clear so far. In this randomised trial we would like to compare 2 different radiotherapyschedules: 16 fractions à rato of 4 fractions a week versus 25 fractions à rato of 5 fractions a week. The incidence on acute toxicity and early late toxicity (i.e. within 2 year post radiotherapy) and the impact on quality of life will be registrated and compared. The study will be performed in 2 stages. For stage 1, sample size was calculated to rule out an upper limit of 40% of patients with RTOG grade 2 or worse bowel (GI) complications with an expected rate of 25%, based on a one-stage Fleming-A'Hern design. A power of 83.0% (alpha level 0.038 one-sided) was obtained when including 72 patients per group (144 patients in total). If 22 or more patients out of 72 had grade 2 or worse GI complications, then the study arm was to be rejected. To allow for a dropout of 10%, 160 patients were included in stage 1. Sample size for stage 2 was calculated analogously allowing ruling out an upper limit of 35% of patients with RTOG grade 2 or worse GI complications with an expected rate of 25%. When including 155 patients per group (310 in total) a power of 85.7% (alpha level 0.049 one-sided) was obtained. If 45 or more patients out of 155 had grade 2 or worse GI complications, then the study arm was to be rejected. The sample size for stage 1 and stage 2 combined was set at 346 (173 per group), with a 10% allowance for dropout.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
346

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2 prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2013

Longer than P75 for phase_2 prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 30, 2013

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2013

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2013

Completed
6.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 14, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 14, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 22, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

7 years

First QC Date

July 30, 2013

Last Update Submit

December 21, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • acute and early late toxicity

    A maximal incidence of 40% of Grade 2 gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity is allowed. Evaluation of difference in grade 2 and 3 GI toxicity.

    pre radiotherapy

  • acute and early late toxicity

    1 month after radiotherapy

  • acute and early late toxicity

    3 months after radiotherapy

  • acute and early late toxicity

    6 months after radiotherapy

  • acute and early late toxicity

    9 months after radiotherapy

  • acute and early late toxicity

    12 months after radiotherapy

  • acute and early late toxicity

    18 months radiotherapy

  • acute and early late toxicity

    24 months radiotherapy

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • change in quality of life

    from start to 24 months after radiotherapy

  • cost effectiveness

    24 months after radiotherapy

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1

EXPERIMENTAL

16 fractions à rato of 4 fractions a week over 4 weeks

Radiation: hypofractionation

Arm 2

EXPERIMENTAL

25 fractions à rato of 5 fractions a week over 5 weeks

Radiation: hypofractionation

Interventions

Arm 1Arm 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients with T1-4 N0 M0 prostate cancer

You may not qualify if:

  • other no skin cancer diagnosed within 5 years prior to enrolment
  • no informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, 9000, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Fonteyne V, Sarrazyn C, Swimberghe M, De Meerleer G, Rammant E, Vanderstraeten B, Vanpachtenbeke F, Lumen N, Decaestecker K, Colman R, Villeirs G, Ost P. 4 Weeks Versus 5 Weeks of Hypofractionated High-dose Radiation Therapy as Primary Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Interim Safety Analysis of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Mar 15;100(4):866-870. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.016. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Radiation Dose Hypofractionation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dose Fractionation, RadiationRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Valerie Fonteyne

    University Hospital, Ghent

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2013

First Posted

August 13, 2013

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion

July 14, 2020

Study Completion

July 14, 2020

Last Updated

December 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Locations