Comparison of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes (GDM2)
GDM2
2 other identifiers
interventional
921
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single site blinded RCT of 920 pregnant women with singleton gestation designed to compare the Carpenter-Coustan and IADPSG criteria for diagnosing gestational diabetes. Maternal metabolic profiles and infant growth will be assessed at randomization and at one year postpartum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 11, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 5, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 20, 2020
CompletedJuly 20, 2020
July 1, 2020
3.9 years
November 25, 2014
July 2, 2020
July 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Large for Gestational Age (LGA) Infant
birth weight equal to or greater than the 90th percentile for gestational age and sex
at time of delivery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Cesarean Delivery
at delivery (approximately 40 weeks' gestation)
Maternal Composite Morbidity
at delivery (approximately 40 weeks' gestation)
Neonatal Composite Morbidity
7 days after birth
Study Arms (2)
3 hour 100 gm OGTT (CC Criteria)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGestational diabetes screening with fasting 3 hour 100 gm. Receive a fasting 3 hour 100 gram oral glucose tolerance test and are diagnosed based on the Carpenter Coustan Criteria: a 50 gm Glucose tolerance test of \>130 + fasting 3 hour 100 gram oral glucose tolerance test with two or more values greater than the following diagnostic threshold: Fasting 95, 1-hour 180, 2-hour 155, or 3 hour 140 mg/dL . A positive criteria will be diagnostic for gestational diabetes.
2 hr 75 gm OGTT (IADPSG Criteria)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGestational diabetes screening with fasting 2 hour 75g. Receive a fasting 2 hour 75 gm oral glucose tolerance test and diagnosed based on the IADPSG which is if one or more values exceed the following diagnostic threshold: Fasting 92, 1-hour 180, or 2-hour 153 mg/dL.
Interventions
Participants receive fasting 3 hour 100 gm oral glucose tolerance test
Participants receive fasting 2 hour 75 gm oral glucose tolerance test
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnancy between 18-24 weeks of gestation
- Singleton gestation
- Planning to deliver at Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
You may not qualify if:
- Preexisting type 1 or 2 diabetes
- Diabetes diagnosed at less than 24 weeks gestational age (GA)
- Multiple gestations ( e.g. twins or triplets)
- Hypertension requiring medications
- Corticosteroid (IM, oral or IV) use in the 30 days prior to enrollment
- Major congenital anomaly with anticipated preterm delivery due to maternal or fetal indications \< 28 wks GA
- Inability to complete the glucose testing before 30 completed weeks GA
- Advanced HIV( on medications that cause hyperglycemia), severe liver disease, gastric bypass surgery or other illness/surgeries that preclude them from drinking the glucola solution.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UPMC- Magee Womens Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Related Publications (3)
Abebe KZ, Scifres C, Simhan HN, Day N, Catalano P, Bodnar LM, Costacou T, Matthew D, Illes A, Orris S, Duell J, Ly K, Davis EM. Comparison of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes (GDM2) Trial: Design and rationale. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Nov;62:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
PMID: 28823926BACKGROUNDScifres CM, Davis EM, Orris S, Costacou T, Lalama C, Abebe KZ, Catalano P. Metabolic factors and perinatal outcomes among pregnant individuals with mild glucose intolerance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Oct;216:111830. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111830. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
PMID: 39159865DERIVEDDavis EM, Abebe KZ, Simhan HN, Catalano P, Costacou T, Comer D, Orris S, Ly K, Decker A, Mendez D, Day N, Scifres CM. Perinatal Outcomes of Two Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul 1;138(1):6-15. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004431.
PMID: 34259458DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Center for Research on Health Care Data Center
- Organization
- University of Pittsburgh
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Esa M Davis, MD MPH
University of Pittsburgh
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2014
First Posted
December 5, 2014
Study Start
August 11, 2015
Primary Completion
July 3, 2019
Study Completion
June 5, 2020
Last Updated
July 20, 2020
Results First Posted
July 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Data will be shared in the appropriate time frame required by policy.
- Access Criteria
- An application and review process will be implemented for accessing data.
Once the study is completed and the investigators have published the main manuscripts regarding the outcomes of the trial. De-identified data will be made available by request, review and approval of the investigators and the institution regulatory committee.