NCT02305849

Brief Summary

The objective of this study was to verify the efficacy of ASP015K versus placebo administrated in combination with methotrexate (MTX) over placebo in terms of efficacy in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to MTX

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
519

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2014

Typical duration for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

146 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 25, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 3, 2014

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 20, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 28, 2017

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 3, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

December 1, 2014

Results QC Date

June 3, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 17, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

ASP015KRheumatoid Arthritis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Response at Week 12

    ACR20 response: greater than and equal to (≥) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria compared with baseline: 1) physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant's assessment of disease activity, 3) participant's assessment of pain, 4) participant's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) C-reactive protein at each visit.

    Baseline and week 12/Early termination (ET)

  • Change From Baseline in mTSS at Week 28

    mTSS was defined as the sum of joint erosion scores graded by assessing erosion severity in 44 joints (16 per hand and 6 per feet) and JSN scores graded by assessing narrowing of joint spaces in 42 joints (15 per hand and 6 per feet). Erosion score was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (complete collapse of bone) and the score for erosion ranges from 0 to 160 in the hands and from 0 to 120 in the feet (the maximum erosion score for a joint in the foot is 10). JSN including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score of 168. mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst possible total score). Change from baseline was calculated as score at week 28 (ET) minus score at baseline. An increase in mTSS from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.

    Baseline and week 28/ET

Secondary Outcomes (69)

  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR20-CRP Response Through Week 52

    Baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and EOT

  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR50-CRP Response at Week 12

    Baseline and week 12/ET

  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR50-CRP Response Through Week 52

    Baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and EOT

  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR70-CRP Response at Week 12

    Baseline and week 12/ET

  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR70-CRP Response Through Week 52

    Baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and EOT

  • +64 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Peficitinib 100 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received 100 mg tablet of peficitinib orally once daily in combination with MTX for a period of 52 weeks.

Drug: PeficitinibDrug: Methotrexate

Peficitinib 150 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received 150 mg tablet of peficitinib orally once daily in combination with MTX for a period of 52 weeks.

Drug: PeficitinibDrug: Methotrexate

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants who received placebo matching to peficitinib 100 mg or 150 mg orally once daily in combination with MTX until week 12 or 28 were switched to receive 100 mg or 150 mg tablet of peficitinib orally once daily in combination with MTX from week 12 or 28 to week 52.

Drug: PlaceboDrug: Methotrexate

Interventions

oral tablet

Also known as: ASP015K
Peficitinib 100 mgPeficitinib 150 mg

oral tablet

Placebo

Oral tablet/capsule

Peficitinib 100 mgPeficitinib 150 mgPlacebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject has RA of \< 10 years duration at baseline that was diagnosed according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria
  • Subject who did not receive the following drugs, or received the drugs with stable dosage for at least 28 days prior to the baseline (start of treatment) for RA treatment:
  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; excluding topical formulations with a local action), oral morphine or equivalent opioid analgesics (≤ 30 mg/day), acetaminophen, or oral corticosteroids (≤ 10 mg/day in prednisolone equivalent)
  • At screening subject has active RA as evidenced by both of the following:
  • ≥ 6 tender/painful joints (using 68-joint assessment)
  • ≥ 6 swollen joints (using 66-joint assessment)
  • CRP (latex agglutination test) of ≥ 1.00 mg/dL at screening.
  • Subject meets the ACR 1991 Revised Criteria for the Classification of Global Functional Status in RA Class I, II or, III at screening
  • Inadequate responders to MTX which was continuously administered for at least 90 days prior to screening and MTX ≥ 8 mg/week for at least 28 days prior to baseline. However, inadequate responder to MTX \< 8 mg/week is eligible if intolerance precludes dose increase and defined as MTX-IR
  • Subject is able to continue stable dose of MTX (a maximum of 16 mg/week) from at least 28 days prior to screening until the end of treatment
  • Subject has bone erosion at the joint (as evidenced by x-rays of hands and feet) assessed in mTSS and any of the following apply at screening. Bone erosion may be evidenced by x-rays within 90 days prior to baseline.
  • Positive anti-CCP antibody: ≥ 4.5 U/mL
  • Positive rheumatoid factor: \> 15 IU/mL

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has received a biologic DMARD within the specified period
  • Inadequate responders to biologic DMARD as determined by investigator/sub-investigator
  • Subject has received intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular or endorectal (excluding suppositories for anal diseases) corticosteroid within 28 days prior to baseline
  • Subject has participated in any study of ASP015K and has received ASP015K or placebo
  • Subject has received other investigational drugs within 90 days or within 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to baseline
  • Subject has received plasma exchange therapy within 60 days prior to baseline
  • Subject has undergone joint drainage, has received local anesthesia and nerve block, or has received articular cartilage protectant at the assessed joint within 28 days prior to baseline
  • Subject has undergone surgery and has residual effects in the assessed joints at the discretion of investigator/sub-investigator, or is scheduled to undergo surgery that may affect the study evaluation of the assessed joints at the discretion of investigator/sub-investigator
  • A diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis (psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, SLE, sarcoidosis, etc.) other than RA
  • Any of the following laboratory values at screening:
  • Hemoglobin \< 9.0 g/dL
  • Absolute neutrophil count \< 1000/μL
  • Absolute lymphocyte count \< 800/μL
  • Platelet count \< 75000/μL
  • ALT ≥ 2 ×ULN
  • +16 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (146)

JP00037

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

JP00109

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

JP00130

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

JP00175

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

JP00066

Okazaki, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

JP00108

Toyohashi, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

JP00170

Toyohashi, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

JP00156

Toyota, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

JP00068

Yatomi, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

JP00180

Asahi, Chiba, Japan

Location

JP00166

Funabashi, Chiba, Japan

Location

JP00115

Narashino, Chiba, Japan

Location

JP00138

Yotsukaidō, Chiba, Japan

Location

JP00120

Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00110

Kasuga, Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00040

Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00119

Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00071

Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00106

Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00033

Takasaki, Gunma, Japan

Location

JP00163

Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan

Location

JP00124

Tomakomai, Hokaido, Japan

Location

JP00026

Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

JP00090

Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

JP00172

Kitami, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

JP00125

Kushiro, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

JP00001

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

JP00002

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

JP00003

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

JP00038

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

JP00114

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

JP00056

Akashi, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

JP00069

Himeji, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

JP00136

Itami, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

JP00113

Kakogawa, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

JP00041

Katō, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

JP00042

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

JP00092

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

JP00154

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

JP00171

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

JP00117

Nishinomiya, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

JP00107

Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan

Location

JP00181

Hitachi-Naka, Ibaraki, Japan

Location

JP00073

Koga, Ibaraki, Japan

Location

JP00054

Mito, Ibaraki, Japan

Location

JP00039

Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

Location

JP00179

Komatsu, Ishikawa-ken, Japan

Location

JP00049

Morioka, Iwate, Japan

Location

JP00088

Kida, Kagawa-ken, Japan

Location

JP00084

Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

JP00048

Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

JP00058

Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

JP00141

Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

JP00096

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

JP00045

Zushi, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

JP00019

Kōshi, Kumamoto, Japan

Location

JP00057

Tamana, Kumamoto, Japan

Location

JP00168

Yokkaichi, Mie-ken, Japan

Location

JP00169

Ōsaki, Miyagi, Japan

Location

JP00004

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Location

JP00036

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Location

JP00105

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Location

JP00151

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Location

JP00050

Hyūga, Miyazaki, Japan

Location

JP00129

Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan

Location

JP00162

Isehaya, Nagasaki, Japan

Location

JP00101

Ōmura, Nagasaki, Japan

Location

JP00103

Ōmura, Nagasaki, Japan

Location

JP00153

Sasebo, Nagasaki, Japan

Location

JP00094

Kashihara, Nara, Japan

Location

JP00025

Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan

Location

JP00144

Shibata, Niigata, Japan

Location

JP00064

Beppu, Oita Prefecture, Japan

Location

JP00051

Setouchi, Okayama-ken, Japan

Location

JP00011

Hannan, Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00134

Higashiosaka, Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00178

Hirakata, Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00078

Kawachi-Nagano, Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00137

Sakai, Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00070

Suita, Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00146

Suita, Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00061

Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00075

Ureshino, Saga-ken, Japan

Location

JP00126

Gyōda, Saitama, Japan

Location

JP00007

Hiki, Saitama, Japan

Location

JP00060

Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan

Location

JP00161

Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan

Location

JP00062

Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan

Location

JP00052

Sayama, Saitama, Japan

Location

JP00008

Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan

Location

JP00133

Kakegawa, Shizuoka, Japan

Location

JP00077

Kanuma, Tochigi, Japan

Location

JP00145

Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan

Location

JP00024

Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00143

Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00149

Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00152

Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00099

Chiyoda City, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00142

Chūō, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00063

Hachiōji, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00053

Kiyose, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00072

Meguro City, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00148

Ōta-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00081

Shibuya City, Tokyo, Japan

Location

JP00010

Takaoka, Toyama, Japan

Location

JP00155

Nishimuro, Wakayama, Japan

Location

JP00104

Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi, Japan

Location

JP00047

Shūnan, Yamaguchi, Japan

Location

JP00176

Fukui, Japan

Location

JP00018

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00020

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00035

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00059

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00067

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00076

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00131

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00164

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

JP00165

Fukushima, Japan

Location

JP00013

Hiroshima, Japan

Location

JP00014

Hiroshima, Japan

Location

JP00016

Hiroshima, Japan

Location

JP00055

Hiroshima, Japan

Location

JP00074

Kagoshima, Japan

Location

JP00167

Kagoshima, Japan

Location

JP00093

Kochi, Japan

Location

JP00022

Kumamoto, Japan

Location

JP00046

Kumamoto, Japan

Location

JP00085

Kyoto, Japan

Location

JP00123

Kyoto, Japan

Location

JP00160

Kyoto, Japan

Location

JP00023

Miyagi, Japan

Location

JP00122

Miyazaki, Japan

Location

JP00080

Nagano, Japan

Location

JP00174

Nagano, Japan

Location

JP00098

Nagasaki, Japan

Location

JP00112

Nagasaki, Japan

Location

JP00147

Nagasaki, Japan

Location

JP00118

Okayama, Japan

Location

JP00150

Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00157

Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00177

Osaka, Japan

Location

JP00017

Ōita, Japan

Location

JP00044

Shizuoka, Japan

Location

JP00089

Shizuoka, Japan

Location

JP00135

Shizuoka, Japan

Location

JP00139

Toyama, Japan

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Kato D, Kaneko Y, Fukuda M, Izutsu H, Rokuda M, van der Heijde D. Post hoc analysis of clinical characteristics of patients with radiographic progression in a Japanese phase 3 trial of peficitinib and methotrexate treatment (RAJ4). Mod Rheumatol. 2023 Jan 3;33(1):73-80. doi: 10.1093/mr/roac021.

  • Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Izutsu H, Kaneko Y, Kato D, Fukuda M, Rokuda M, Schultz NM. Patient- and physician-reported outcomes from two phase 3 randomized studies (RAJ3 and RAJ4) of peficitinib (ASP015K) in Asian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Aug 24;23(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02590-z.

  • Toyoshima J, Kaibara A, Shibata M, Kaneko Y, Izutsu H, Nishimura T. Exposure-response modeling of peficitinib efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021 May;9(3):e00744. doi: 10.1002/prp2.744.

  • Toyoshima J, Shibata M, Kaibara A, Kaneko Y, Izutsu H, Nishimura T. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of peficitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;87(4):2014-2022. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14605. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

  • Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Tanaka S, Kawakami A, Iwasaki M, Katayama K, Rokuda M, Izutsu H, Ushijima S, Kaneko Y, Shiomi T, Yamada E, van der Heijde D. Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RAJ4) in Japan. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Oct;78(10):1305-1319. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215164. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Interventions

peficitinibMethotrexate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AminopterinPterinsPteridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Trial Disclosure
Organization
Astellas Pharma Inc.

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Astellas Pharma Inc

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2014

First Posted

December 3, 2014

Study Start

July 25, 2014

Primary Completion

June 20, 2017

Study Completion

November 28, 2017

Last Updated

October 28, 2024

Results First Posted

August 3, 2020

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
Time Frame
Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.
Access Criteria
Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.
More information

Locations