Impact of Advance Care Planning on Care for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure
1 other identifier
interventional
282
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Aims: Advance care planning (ACP) is considered to be one of the most promising interventions to enable patients with life limiting illnesses to receive treatment at the end of life (EOL) according to their own preferences and to promote EOL conversations between patients and their health care providers. Through a 2-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) of patients with Class III and IV heart failure (New York Heart Association Functional Classification), we propose to assess:
- 1.Whether patients in the ACP arm have a greater likelihood of receiving EOL care consistent with their preferences as stated in the latter of the last ACP document or the last patient interview, compared to patients in the control arm.
- 2.Heath care costs during study duration between patients in ACP and control arms.
- 3.Patient's understanding of own illness and their participation in decision making between the ACP and control arms.
- 4.Patient's quality of life, anxiety and depression between ACP and control arms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Feb 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable heart-failure
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 24, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedFebruary 8, 2019
February 1, 2019
3.3 years
November 18, 2014
February 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients receiving end of life care consistent with their stated preferences
Patient's stated preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and life prolonging treatments (e.g. mechanical ventilation, dialysis, feeding tube, intravenous antibiotics, blood transfusion) will be assessed from their last survey or their ACP document. The actual treatment received by the patient will be assessed from medical records after the patient's death. Proportion of patients who died and received treatment consistent with their stated preferences will be calculated and compared between ACP and control arms
one year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Total health care expenditure of patients during study duration
one year
Patient scores for Quality of life
every four months for one year
Patient's understanding of own illness
every four months for one year
Patient scores for anxiety and depression
every four months for one year
Patient's participation in decision-making
every four months for one year
Study Arms (2)
Control arm
NO INTERVENTIONThe control arm patients will not take part in ACP discussions and documentation, but will continue to receive usual care.
Intervention (ACP) arm
EXPERIMENTALThe patient and his/her family members will be referred to an ACP facilitator and will undergo ACP as an ongoing process, integrated with patient's care, from the facilitator, in coordination with a coordinator/nurse, and treating physician. The ACP facilitator will be certified in providing ACP and will possess sufficient knowledge of the risks, benefits, and harms of treatments and procedures available to the patient. The ACP facilitator will be supported by the physician with the specialized knowledge of treatment options, especially with regards to prognosis. Family members will be encouraged to be present during the ACP discussion so that the whole family unit will be able to explore goals, values and beliefs towards the patient's medical care.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient participant:
- Patients must be 21 years old or older and must be diagnosed with advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association Class III and IV). Patients must be aware of their diagnosis
- Caregiver/Decision-maker participant: Subject must be 21 years old or older Participant must be either
- appointed substitute decision maker or
- most likely to be substitute decision maker for patient (if patient were to lose decision-making capacity)
You may not qualify if:
- Patient participant: Patients must not have any psychiatric or cognitive disorders
- Caregiver/Decision-maker participant: Cannot be a maid or foreign domestic worker
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical Schoollead
- National Heart Centre Singaporecollaborator
- Singapore General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169608, Singapore
National Heart Centre Singapore
Singapore, 169609, Singapore
Related Publications (3)
Malhotra C, Hu M, Malhotra R, Sim D, Jaufeerally FR, Bundoc FG, Finkelstein EA. Instability in End-of-Life Care Preference Among Heart Failure Patients: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial in Singapore. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2010-2016. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05740-2. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
PMID: 32103441DERIVEDMalhotra C, Sim D, Jaufeerally F, Finkelstein EA. Associations between understanding of current treatment intent, communication with healthcare providers, preferences for invasive life-sustaining interventions and decisional conflict: results from a survey of patients with advanced heart failure in Singapore. BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 19;8(9):e021688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021688.
PMID: 30232107DERIVEDMalhotra C, Sim DK, Jaufeerally F, Vikas NN, Sim GW, Tan BC, Ng CS, Tho PL, Lim J, Chuang CY, Fong FH, Liu J, Finkelstein EA. Impact of advance care planning on the care of patients with heart failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Jun 10;17(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1414-1.
PMID: 27287330DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chetna Malhotra, MD, MPH
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2014
First Posted
November 24, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02