Improving Muscle Assessment in Older Adults - The "Can We Build a Better Mouse Trap?" Study
1 other identifier
observational
112
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study is to compare traditional muscle function tests with computerized versions using body-worn motion sensors and video motion analysis of the same tests. The investigators selected the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test as the investigators primary variable for this aim with several other function tests (e.g., repeated chair rise, 6-meter walk, 2-minute walk, Romberg stance, semi-tandem / tandem stance) as secondary variables. The investigators primary hypothesis is that the computerized versions of the TUG test are highly correlated (\>0.9) with the traditional method, but with comparable or better reproducibility. Secondary analyses will correlate other function tests with their computerized version, again with the hypothesis that they are highly correlated and that computerized versions are of similar or better reproducibility. This analysis will also compare traditional assessments of balance with a computerized balance method, computerized dynamic posturography.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2015
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedMarch 28, 2016
March 1, 2016
8 months
October 3, 2014
March 25, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The comparison of results of traditional physical function tests with the results of computerized versions (body worn sensors and Kinect system) of the same tests.
Short-term reproducibility of traditional vs. computerized functional tests will also be compared.
All physical function tests will be performed at the first visit and visit 2 up to 4 days later
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Explore the capabilities of the Microsoft Kinect system to record and analyze muscle function tests and correlate the Microsoft Kinect system to a gold standard motion analysis system.
All physical function tests will be performed at the first visit and visit 2 up to 4 days later.
Validate the use of BIS (Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy) to adjust DXA (Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry) -measured body composition by providing muscle mass measurement
BIS is performed at visit 1 and visit 2 up to 4 days later. DXA is performed at visit 2.
Correlate various ratios of lean or muscle mass / DXA measured fat mass with functional tests.
All physical function tests will be performed at the screen and follow up visits.
Interventions
This is an observational trial, no interventions are being used.
Eligibility Criteria
This study will evaluate community dwelling women and men ≥ 70 years recruited from the Madison, Wisconsin area.
You may qualify if:
- Ambulatory, community dwelling men and women age ≥ 70 years
- Able and willing to sign informed consent
- Able to stand without assistance
You may not qualify if:
- History of myocardial infarction within the prior six months or ongoing angina
- History of injury or surgery within the prior six months which limits the ability to ambulate
- History of malignancy with metastasis to the musculoskeletal system
- Neuromuscular disease or severe end organ disease impairing balance or muscle function to the degree that completion of all study tests is unlikely.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin-Madison Osteoporosis Clinical Research Program
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Biospecimen
Blood will be drawn to obtain a serum chemistry panel to document health status of the study participants. For subjects who agree to optional banking, serum aliquots will be obtained and banked for future study of markers relevant to musculoskeletal health.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neil Binkley, M.D.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2014
First Posted
November 20, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 28, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03