Study Stopped
The study was stopped due to the feasibility of recruiting the study in a timely manner
A Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Retosiban Versus Atosiban for Women in Spontaneous Preterm Labour
Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Retosiban Versus Atosiban Therapy for Women in Spontaneous Preterm Labor
2 other identifiers
interventional
97
9 countries
21
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of retosiban to prolong pregnancy in females with spontaneous preterm labor compared with atosiban. This objective is based on the hypothesis that prolonging the time to delivery in the absence of harm may benefit the newborn, particularly in women who experience spontaneous preterm labor at early gestational ages (GA). This study is designed to test this hypothesis through a direct comparison with atosiban, a mixed oxytocin vasopressin antagonist indicated for short-term use to delay imminent preterm birth in women between 24\^0/7 and 33\^6/7 weeks' gestation in preterm labor. This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study, which consists of 6 phases: Screening, Inpatient Randomized Treatment, Post Infusion Assessment, Delivery, Maternal Post Delivery Assessment, and Neonatal Medical Review. Approximately 330 females will be randomly assigned to retosiban or atosiban treatment in a 1:1 ratio. The duration of any one subject's (maternal or neonatal) participation in the study will be variable and dependent on GA at study entry and the date of delivery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Mar 2015
21 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 16, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 25, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 10, 2018
CompletedJuly 29, 2020
July 1, 2020
2.4 years
November 13, 2014
February 21, 2018
July 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Delivery From the Start of Investigational Product (IP) Administration
Time to delivery is the number of days from the first dose of study treatment until delivery. The time to delivery was calculated as the days between the delivery and start time of the study treatment infusion using the formula: Time to delivery (days) = (date and time of delivery minus date and time of start of infusion) divided by (24 multiplied by 60). The adjusted mean number of days to delivery along with standard error has been presented. Maternal intent-to-treat (ITT) Population comprised of all mothers randomly assigned to treatment who have been exposed to study treatment irrespective of their compliance to the planned course of treatment.
Up to 17 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (41)
Number of Participants With Births Prior to 37 0/7 Weeks Gestation
Up to 13 weeks
Number of Participants With Births at Term
Up to 17 weeks
Length of Neonatal Hospital Stay
Up to 28 days post estimated date of delivery (EDD) of 40 0/7 weeks gestation
Number of Neonates With Composite Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality
Up to 28 weeks after EDD (40 weeks gestation)
Number of Neonates With Any Composite Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality, Excluding RDS
Up to 28 weeks after EDD (40 weeks gestation)
- +36 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Retosiban + Atosiban Placebo
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive retosiban 6 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) loading dose over 5 minutes, followed by a 6mg/hour continuous infusion over 48 hours. For subjects with an inadequate response after the first hour of treatment, investigators will administer another 6mg IV loading dose and increase the infusion rate to 12 mg/hour for the remainder of the 48-hour treatment period. Participants will also receive placebo infusion matched for the atosiban loading (bolus) dose and continuous infusion to ensure blinding.
Atosiban + Retosiban Placebo
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive atosiban in 3 successive stages: an initial bolus dose (6.75 mg) over 1 minute, immediately followed by a continuous infusion at 18 mg/hour for 3 hours, followed by a 6 mg/hour infusion for the remainder of the 48-hour treatment period. Participants will also receive placebo infusion matched for retosiban loading (bolus) dose and continuous infusion to ensure blinding.
Interventions
Solution for infusion, consisting of a clear colorless solution of retosiban at a concentration of 15 milligram/milliliter (mg/mL) in 56% volume/volume ethanol/acetate buffer concentrate supplied in 5 mL vial containing 75mg retosiban.
Clear, colorless solution for injection in a 0.9-mL vial containing 6.75 mg of atosiban. Clear, colorless concentrate for solution for infusion in a 5-mL vial containing 37.5 mg atosiban.
A placebo infusion containing 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) matched for retosiban loading (bolus) dose and continuous infusion.
A placebo infusion containing 0.9% NaCl matched for the atosiban loading (bolus) dose and continuous infusion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed and dated written informed consent is required prior to a subject's participation in the study and the performance of any protocol specific procedures. Adolescents aged 12 to 17 years must provide written agreement to participate in the study in accordance with applicable regulatory and country or state requirements. Subjects will also be asked to sign a release for medical records at the time of consenting to allow access to both the maternal and neonatal records including information about delivery and infant care as well as information collected prior to the consent having been signed.
- Females aged 12 to 45 years, with an uncomplicated, singleton pregnancy and intact membranes in preterm labor (Note: This protocol includes pregnant adolescents, aged 12 to 17 years, as appropriate, based on national or local regulations.).
- Gestational age between 24\^0/7 and 33\^6/7 weeks as determined by known fertilization date, either in vitro fertilization or intrauterine insemination, last menstrual period confirmed by the earliest ultrasound prior to 24\^0/7 weeks' gestation, or the earliest ultrasound alone prior to 24\^0/7 weeks' gestation, whichever is the most accurate method available for each subject. In situations where prenatal ultrasound records are not available at the time the subject presents, the investigator will make every effort to obtain these records (either via computer records, directly from the subject's primary care obstetrician, or via telephone). However, in cases in which these records are not readily available (e.g., off hours, holiday), it is within the investigator's discretion to use GA based on a verbal history from the subject with the intent of getting confirmation from the medical records as soon as possible.
- Subjects must be diagnosed with preterm labor according to both of the following criteria:
- Regular uterine contractions at a rate of \>=4 contractions of at least 30 seconds duration during a 30-minute interval confirmed by tocodynamometry
- AND at least 1 of the following:
- Cervical dilation \>=2 centimeter (cm) and \<=4 cm by digital cervical examination or If \<2 cm dilation by digital cervical examination, a cervical change consisting of an increase of at least 25% effacement or 1 cm dilation
You may not qualify if:
- Fever with a temperature greater than 100.4°fahrenheit (F) (38°Celcius \[C\]) for more than 1 hour or \>=101°F (38.3°C) in the 24 hours prior to the start of study treatment.
- Women with maternal-fetal conditions that potentially necessitate the need for delivery, such as pre-eclampsia or fetal compromise
- A fetus with any diagnosis, condition, treatment, or other factor that in the opinion of the investigator has the potential to affect or confound assessments of efficacy or safety (e.g., nonreassuring fetal status, intrauterine growth restriction, major congenital anomaly).
- Preterm premature rupture of membranes
- Women with any confirmed or suspected contraindication to prolongation of pregnancy, such as placental abruption, chorioamnionitis, or placenta previa
- Evidence of polyhydramnios (amniotic fluid index \[AFI\] \>25 cm) or oligohydramnios (AFI \<5 cm).
- Women with co-morbid medical or obstetric conditions that in the opinion of the investigator have the potential to complicate the pregnancy course and outcomes, such as uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes (if known, history of glycosylated hemoglobin \>8% at any time during pregnancy), or compromise the safety of the subject, such as underlying cardiovascular disorder (specifically ischemic cardiac disease, congenital heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, valvular heart disease, arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy).
- Women with a history of substance abuse or urine drug screen findings suggestive of substance abuse that may either be implicated as the cause of preterm labor (e.g., abuse of cocaine or methamphetamines) or have the potential to complicate the pregnancy outcome (e.g., alcohol abuse or opioid addiction).
- Women with any diagnosis, condition, treatment, or other factor that in the opinion of the investigator has the potential to affect or confound assessments of efficacy or safety.
- Women with documented active hepatitis B or hepatitis C viral infection, unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones).
- History of sensitivity to the IPs or components thereof or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)/PPD medical monitor, contraindicates their participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
- PPD Development, LPcollaborator
Study Sites (21)
GSK Investigational Site
Bruges, 8000, Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, 1200, Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79106, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Jena, Thuringia, 07743, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22087, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Haifa, 31048, Israel
GSK Investigational Site
Holon, 58100, Israel
GSK Investigational Site
Kfar Saba, 44281, Israel
GSK Investigational Site
Petah Tikva, 49100, Israel
GSK Investigational Site
Safed, 13100, Israel
GSK Investigational Site
Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
GSK Investigational Site
Siena, Tuscany, 53100, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Monza, 20052, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460, Mexico
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, 85000, Mexico
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 135-081, South Korea
GSK Investigational Site
Sungnam, 463712, South Korea
GSK Investigational Site
Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Uppsala, SE-75185, Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Sheffield, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2014
First Posted
November 17, 2014
Study Start
March 16, 2015
Primary Completion
August 25, 2017
Study Completion
August 25, 2017
Last Updated
July 29, 2020
Results First Posted
September 10, 2018
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (click on the link provided below)
- Access Criteria
- Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.