Improving the Quality of Private Sector Health Care in West Bengal
1 other identifier
interventional
304
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The rural healthcare market in much of the developing world is composed largely of informal private providers. These private providers often have little to no certifiable medical training. Recent studies in India using medical vignettes (or hypothetical medical situations) to measure clinical competence and direct observations of doctor-patient interactions to measure clinical practice highlight the poor quality of care that most patients receive-a problem that is clearly relevant beyond India and affects most low-income countries worldwide. For instance:
- 1.In rural India, standardized patients presenting with chest pain and (on further questioning) radiating pain in the arm are (correctly) diagnosed with a heart attack in less than 25 percent of cases.
- 2.Across 8 low and middle-income countries, health care providers completed the four necessary vital statistics for new patients in less than 4 percent of interactions: health care providers in the public sectors of many developing countries routinely spend less than 1 minute per patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedJune 28, 2017
June 1, 2017
1.6 years
January 24, 2014
June 27, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Practice
Clinical Practice will be assessed in two ways. First, we will send Standardized Patients, or trained professionals who present with a pre-developed set of symptoms (of one of the three conditions specified) to a provider without the provider's knowledge that he/she is acting. Second, the evaluating team will sit in the providers' clinics after the completion of the intervention, observing provider-patient interactions for a full day. Information will be obtained for each provider-patient interaction on (a) consultation length, (b) history taking, (c) examinations performed, (d) information given to the patient, (e) medicines dispensed/prescribed and (f) prices charged.
Endline (3-4 months after completion of intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Competence
Endline (3-4 months after completion of intervention)
Clinical prices and caseload
Endline (3-4 months after completion of intervention)
Study Arms (2)
Training
EXPERIMENTALOf the 304 participants in the study, half will be randomized into the treatment arm in which they will receive training from the Liver Foundation.The objective of the Liver Foundation's training program will be capacity building through information in health sciences, training in referral techniques during emergencies, and maternal and child health care priorities in rural areas. The training will be in the form of two three-hour classes per week and will continue for nine months, with three mid-term exams administered every three. During this time, the evaluation team will only collect the rosters of the attendees of the training classes and conduct sporadic random visits to the sessions to gain a better sense of the training methods and attendance rates.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORHalf of the sample will be randomized into the control group, for whom there will be no training. They will be phased into training the following year. For the current year, the control group will experience no difference in their routine, aside from some (infrequent) opportunities to participate in other public health activities as provided by the Liver Foundation to any provider involved in their various programs.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- must be a private rural healthcare practitioner in West Bengal
You may not qualify if:
- cannot live outside of three specified districts of West Bengal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lablead
- National Rural Health Mission, Government of West Bengal, Indiacollaborator
- Liver Foundation, West Bengalcollaborator
- World Bankcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jishnu Das, PhD
World Bank
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abhijit Banerjee, PhD
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MIT Professor of Economics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2014
First Posted
November 14, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06