COPD Aerosol Study Comparing the Efficacy of Nebulizers Versus Dry Powder Inhalers
A Randomized, Double-Dummy, Crossover, Single-Center Study Comparing the Efficacy of Nebulizers Versus Dry Powder Inhalers in the Treatment of Patients Recovering From Severe Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare drug delivery and lung function after treatment with formoterol from a nebulizer versus a dry powder inhaler (DPI) in patients recovering from severe exacerbations of COPD. This is to determine if one device is superior in providing better lung function and drug deposition in this clinical setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 19, 2019
CompletedMarch 19, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.1 years
November 5, 2014
November 6, 2018
February 28, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Difference Between the Values of Area Under the Response Curve for FEV1
The difference between the values of area under the response curve for FEV1 from baseline through four hours (AUC FEV1 0-4h) after inhalation of formoterol with a nebulizer or a dry powder inhaler.
Baseline through study completion (visit 1 through visit 2)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Percentage Change in Peak FEV1 From Baseline After Inhalation of Formoterol
From pre-dose formoterol (baseline 0hrs) to 30 minutes, 1,2, and 4 hours post dose at visit 1 and measured again at visit 2
Absolute Increase in FEV1 From Baseline After Inhalation of Formoterol
Measured at visit 1 and visit 2 after dosing and all FEV1 testing has been completed
Peak FEV1 Between the Two Devices (Nebulizer and DPI)
Measured from Start of visit 1 until the completion of visit 2
Change in FEV1 as a Percentage of Predicted Normal After Inhalation of Formoterol
Baseline through study completion (visit 1 through visit 2)
Area Under the Response Curve for FVC From Baseline Through Four Hours (AUC FVC0-4h) After Inhalation of Formoterol
Measured at visit 1 and again at the end of visit 2
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Formoterol via DPI then Formoterol via nebulizer
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup A: Received Formoterol 12 µg via DPI and placebo via nebulizer at treatment visit #1, and Formoterol 20 µg (solution form) via nebulizer and placebo via DPI at treatment visit 2. Placebo: The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for nebulizer inhalation and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Formoterol via nebulizer then Formoterol via DPI
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B: Received Formoterol 20 µg (solution form) via nebulizer and placebo via a DPI at treatment visit #1, and Formoterol 12 µg via a DPI with placebo via nebulizer at treatment visit 2. Placebo: The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for nebulizer inhalation and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Interventions
Comparison of dosage administered via a nebulizer versus dosage administered via a dry powder inhaler. 12 µg Formoterol with the dry powder inhaler and 20 µg (solution form) of Formoterol with the nebulizer. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Comparison of drug administered via a nebulizer versus a dry powder inhaler. The placebo used will be sterile, preservative free, normal saline for inhalation for the nebulizer and a matched capsule without active drug for the dry powder inhaler. All patients will receive 2 ml of normal saline with the nebulizer to match the volume of nebulized formoterol solution. Patients will receive formoterol and placebo at both study visit #1 and visit #2.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Current or past cigarette smoking history of \>/= 10 pack-years.
- FEV1/FVC ratio \</= 70%.
- Known diagnosis of COPD.
- Current hospitalization for a primary diagnosis of acute exacerbation of COPD.
- Must be able to understand and willing to sign an informed consent document.
You may not qualify if:
- On a ventilator or mask ventilation.
- Allergy or contraindication to Formoterol use.
- Marked QTc prolongation (\> 450 ms).
- Liver cirrhosis or chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 2 mg/dL).
- Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (heart rate \> 110 bpm) or ventricular arrhythmia (frequent PVCs, ventricular tachycardia).
- Acute myocardial infarction within 12 weeks of patient study registration.
- Known pulmonary embolism.
- Known or suspected lung cancer.
- Known neuromuscular disease, stroke with residual hemiparesis, or untreated Parkinsonism
- Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, diaphragm, or sub dermal implants).
- Inability to understand instructions.
- Participation in another investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of patient study registration.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trials Coordinator
- Organization
- University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rajiv Dhand, MD
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2014
First Posted
November 14, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 19, 2019
Results First Posted
March 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02