Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Versus Omega-Loop Gastric Bypass (OLGB) Safety and Efficacy Short-term Study
ROSESS
Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Study Comparing Two Bariatric Bypass Procedures, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Omega-Loop Gastric Bypass (OLGB), in Patients With Severe Obesity and Metabolic Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the relative clinical outcomes between two variants of gastric bypass \[Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) or Omega-Loop Gastric Bypass (OLGB)\] in metabolic surgery candidates with Body Mass Index (BMI) between 35 and 50. The study will examine the short and medium term effects of each intervention on weight, obesity comorbidities, quality of life and gastroscopy findings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedNovember 14, 2014
November 1, 2014
4.4 years
October 31, 2014
November 10, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite measure of success of bariatric surgery as measured by Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS)
BAROS composite score rates weight loss, change in comorbidities, and quality of life.
baseline, 1 and 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Change in weight, measured as Percent of Excess Weight Loss (%EWL)
baseline, 1 and 2 years
Change in weight, measured as Percent of Excess Body Mass Index Loss (%EBMIL)
baseline, 1 and 2 years
Change in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, measured as intensity of medical treatment: increased, same, decreased, or discontinued
baseline, 1 and 2 years
Change in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, measured as intensity of treatment: diet alone, oral antidiabetic agent(s), insulin (IU/day)
baseline, 1 and 2 years
Durability of change in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, measured as proportion of patients with T2DM partial remission who experience T2DM "relapse"
2 years
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Operative time, measured in minutes
intraoperative
Length of inpatient stay due to performance of assigned intervention, measured in days
recorded at time of discharge, estimated average 4 days from the surgery
Change in body weight, measured as proportion of patients with EWL > 50%, and proportion of patients with EWL < 25%
baseline, 1 and 2 years
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and routine care.
Omega-Loop Gastric Bypass
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic Omega-Loop Gastric Bypass and routine care.
Interventions
Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass performed with two anastomoses (gastro-enteral and entero- enteral), two limbs (Alimentary limb of length 150cm and Biliary limb of length 75-100cm) and sewing of mesenteric defect.
Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass performed with single anastomosis (gastro-enteral) connecting a long gastric pouch to small bowel with Afferent limb of length 200cm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Severe Obesity: BMI ≥ 40 and ≤ 50 or (BMI ≥ 35 and \< 40 and type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome)
- Inadequate results of Attempts to loose weight by Conservative means
- Ability to understand the nature of the procedure and willing to follow postoperative routine lifestyle and checkups
- no contraindication for bariatric surgery on psychological assessment
- no contraindication for general anesthesia
- consent for both variants of gastric bypass surgery
- consent to participate in a study with randomized design
You may not qualify if:
- prior bariatric surgery of any kind
- gravidity or recent (\<1 year) labour
- drug or alcohol abuse
- symptomatic Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
- hiatal hernia, \> 3cm
- esophagitis, ≥ 2. grade
- active smoker
- chronic renal disease, stage ≥ 3
- patient immobility
- surgery not covered by universal insurance in Czech rep. (i.e. international patients)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bariatric Clinic, Breclav Hospital
Břeclav, 690 74, Czechia
Related Links
- Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
- Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Vs. Mini-gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: a 10-Year Experience
- Greater Weight Loss with the Omega Loop Bypass Compared to the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Comparative Study
- "Mini" Gastric Bypass: Systematic Review of a Controversial Procedure
- Weight Loss Surgery Results
- Interdisciplinary European guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Michal Cierny, Dr.
Breclav Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- bariatric surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2014
First Posted
November 14, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
November 14, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11