Pilot Trial: Comparison of Flow Patterns
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine why sutureless aortic bioprostheses apparently offer better haemodynamic properties compared to sewed-in aortic bioprostheses in patients who underwent aortic valve replacement. Our approach to address this question is the combination of clinical data with the application of specifically validated experimental and computer based analyses to compare the performance of these valves under patient-specific conditions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedMarch 27, 2018
March 1, 2018
6.2 years
October 22, 2014
March 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Comparison of maximum and minimum velocity under patient specific conditions
between 6 months and 4 years after aortic valve replacement
Comparison of the effective orifice area under patient specific conditions
between 6 months and 4 years after aortic valve replacement
Comparison of the percentage of turbulent flow under patient specific conditions
between 6 months and 4 years after aortic valve replacement
Comparison of the pressure drop under patient specific conditions
between 6 months and 4 years after aortic valve replacement
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient-specific, computer simulated pressure gradients compared to echocardiographically obtained pressure gradients.
between 6 months and 4 years after aortic valve replacement
Patient-specific, computer simulated peak velocity compared to echocardiographically obtained peak velocity.
between 6 months and 4 years after aortic valve replacement
Study Arms (2)
"Sutureless" valve
OTHERPatients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a "sutureless" aortic valve. An echocardiogram and a cardiac CT-scan will be conducted.
"Sewed-in" valve
OTHERPatients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a "sewed-in" aortic valve. An echocardiogram and a cardiac CT-scan will be conducted.
Interventions
ECG gated CT angiography of the heart will be performed on a 128-slice dual-source and two Stellar detectors CT system with retrospective ECG-gating (Siemens/SOMATOM Definition Flash - Siemens, Germany, 100kV, 395.75 mAs). In details, multi-phase images will be acquired to reconstruct between 10 and 100% of the cardiac cycle (10% increments) with a slice thickness of 1 mm. Examination will include left ventricular outflow tract, aortic root, coronary sinus, ascending aorta together with the prosthetic valves.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient underwent open aortic valve replacement with either an Edwards Magna Ease or an Edwards Intuity valve
- Implanted valve size 23mm
- Surgical access via full sternotomy or hemisternotomy
- Intuity Valve System implanted by one of the clinical investigators of the TRITON trial (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01445171) at the Medical University of Vienna
- Post-operative ejection fraction ≥50%
- Sinus-Rhythm
- Ability to understand and comply with study procedures
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Under 18 years of age
- Emergency surgery
- Pregnancy
- Previous aortic root replacement
- Previous aortic valve replacement
- Previous or concomitant root enlargement
- Previous or concomitant repair of the ascending aorta
- Paravalvular leakage
- Ectasia of the ascending aorta
- Previous or concomitant myomectomy
- Concomitant replacement or repair of valves other than aortic
- Usage of more than 3 sutures for implantation of the Intuity Valve System
- Heavily calcified aortic root
- Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 30 ml/min
- Inability to understand or comply with study procedures
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical University of Viennalead
- University College, Londoncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alfred Kocher, MD
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2014
First Posted
November 11, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03