NAPS: Non-awake Versus Awake Placement of Spinal Cord Stimulators
NAPS
NAPS (Non-awake Versus Awake Placement of Spinal Cord Stimulators) Study for the Evaluation of Awake and Non-awake Methods of SCS Paddle Lead Placement
1 other identifier
observational
34
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a non-awake implantation method (EMG neuromonitoring) of a SCS paddle lead as compared to an awake implantation method (with local anesthesia and patient feedback).This is a post-market, prospective, multicenter, parallel designed, non-randomized, non-blinded, 6-month study. A minimum of 50 patients will be implanted from up to 4 active sites, coordinated by a single lead investigator. Patients who have had a successful SCS trial and are indicated for permanent implantation will be approached to participate in this study prior to permanent implantation. Patients will be recruited and enrolled by physicians at any one of the involved sites. Each Investigator will only use one method (awake or non-awake) according to his/her typical practice. Patients will receive treatment from their enrolling physician.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Nov 2014
Typical duration for all trials
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2017
CompletedOctober 22, 2021
October 1, 2021
2.3 years
October 27, 2014
October 13, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Safety assessed by the number of adverse events
24 weeks
Efficacy assessed by the procedure time and number of revision differences between the Awake and Non-Awake methods
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain Evaluation
24 weeks
Pain Location
24 weeks
Paresthesia assessed by patient reports of tingling, tickling, or prickling sensation
24 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Patients with successful trial implant
Patients who have had a successful SCS trial and are indicated for permanent implantation will be approached to participate in this study prior to permanent implantation. Patients will be recruited and enrolled by physicians at any one of the involved sites. Each Investigator will only use one method (awake or non-awake) according to his/her typical practice. Patients will receive treatment from their enrolling physician.
Interventions
Upon approximate lead positioning, the patient is brought to a conscious sedated state while maintaining local anesthetic. Stimulation of the spinal cord through the paddle lead is accomplished with an external pulse generator, while communicating with the patient regarding paresthesia coverage of painful regions.
The patient is maintained under general anesthesia for the full duration of the implant. Upon approximate lead positioning, bilateral EMG of myotomes overlapping dermatomal regions of pain are monitored. Stimulation is delivered through the lead by an external pulse generator in order to elicit compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in the target regions. Lead placement is targeted to have symmetric CMAPs (i.e. physiologic midline) and adequate coverage of the painful regions as described by Falowski et al. (Falowski et al., 2011).
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who have had a successful SCS trial and are indicated for permanent implantation will be approached to participate in this study prior to permanent implantation. Patients will be recruited and enrolled by physicians at any one of the involved sites. Each Investigator will only use one method (awake or non-awake) according to his/her typical practice. Patients will receive treatment from their enrolling physician.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have had a successful spinal cord stimulation trial and are indicated for permanent implantation at a participating facility.
- Sign informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- \< 18 years of age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. Luke's Hospital, Pennsylvanialead
- Abbott Medical Devicescollaborator
Study Sites (4)
St. Luke's University Health Network
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, United States
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822, United States
Penn State Hershey Neurosciences Institute
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven Falowski, MD
Principal Investigator
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2014
First Posted
November 6, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 31, 2017
Study Completion
January 31, 2017
Last Updated
October 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
SJM and Dr. Falowski will share results upon study completion.