Safety and Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation With Automatic Control to Treat Chronic Pain in an Extended Trial
Panorama
Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Double-blind Crossover Study Examining the Safety and Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation Incorporating Feedback to Treat Patients With Chronic Pain of the Trunk and/or Limbs in an Extended Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
69
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The aims of the study are to compare automatic control of spinal cord stimulation with manual control in patients with chronic pain of the trunk and limbs
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Jul 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 3, 2016
September 1, 2016
10 months
June 6, 2014
September 30, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Subjects With Improved Pain Relief and/or Stimulation Side Effects During the Automatic Control Arm Relative to the Manual Control Arm
After subjects experience both automatic and manual control after 20 days, subjects are asked to compare pain relief and stimulation side effects between the two arms of the study (blinded) in two separate domains using two 5-point Likert scales. The outcome measure for the primary objective is the percentage of subjects who report improved pain relief with no worsening of stimulation side-effects or improved stimulation side-effects with no loss of pain relief during the automatic control arm relative to the manual control arm. These subjects were considered successful for the primary outcome.
20 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety
20 days
Compare change from baseline of pain scores between automatic and manual control stimulation
20 days
Compare change from baseline of quality of life scores, between automatic and manual control stimulation
20 days
Compare patient satisfaction with stimulation as measured on a 5-point Likert scale between automatic and manual control stimulation
20 days
Study Arms (2)
Automatic Control
EXPERIMENTALAutomatic Control using Saluda Medical External Trial System
Manual Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORManual Control using Saluda Medical External Trial System
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have been diagnosed with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs (VAS ≥ 5), which has been refractory to conservative therapy for a minimum of 3 months.
- Have been approved to undergo a trial of SCS.
- Be an appropriate candidate for the surgical procedures required in this study based on the clinical judgment of the implanting physician
- Be on a stable dose (no new, discontinued, or changes in dose) of all prescribed pain medication for at least 4 weeks prior to the trial
- Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment
- Be willing and capable of giving informed consent
- Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits
- Females of childbearing age must have a negative urine pregnancy test at baseline
You may not qualify if:
- Have a medical condition or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated with SCS, that could interfere with study procedures, accurate pain reporting, and/or confound evaluation of study endpoints, as determined by the Investigator
- Have evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance of intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcomes
- Are not a surgical candidate due to a diagnosis of a coagulation disorder, bleeding diathesis, progressive peripheral vascular disease or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Have a diagnosis of scoliosis that precludes lead placement
- Have a condition, treatable with SCS, that requires leads to be inserted into the cervical region
- Have an existing drug pump and/or SCS system or another active implantable device such as a pacemaker
- Have a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of MRI or diathermy
- Have pain due to a malignant disease
- Have a life expectancy of less than 1 year
- Have an active systemic or local infection
- Be allergic, or have shown hypersensitivity, to any materials of the neurostimulation system which come in contact with the body
- Be pregnant or nursing (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of birth control, be surgically sterile or be at least 2 years post-menopausal)
- Have within 6 months of enrollment a significant untreated addiction to dependency producing medications or have been a substance abuser (including alcohol and/or illicit drugs)
- Be concomitantly participating in another clinical study
- Be involved in an injury claim under current litigation
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
The Pain Center of Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, 85027, United States
Arizona Pain Specialists
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258, United States
Center for Neurosciences
Tucson, Arizona, 85718, United States
Premier Pain Management
Shrewsbury, New Jersey, 07702, United States
University Pain Management Center
Somerset, New Jersey, 08873, United States
Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
St Luke's Hospital, Neurosurgical Associates
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, United States
Performance Spine & Sports Physicians
East Norriton, Pennsylvania, 19403, United States
Fox Chase Pain Management
Feasterville-Trevose, Pennsylvania, 19053, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael J Cousins, MD DSc
Pain Management Research Institute and Kolling Institute, University of Sydney at the Royal North Shore Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ashwini Sharan, MD
Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2014
First Posted
June 12, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 3, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09