NCT02282501

Brief Summary

Enteral alimentation is the preferred modality of support in critical patients who have acceptable digestive function and are unable to eat orally, but the advantages of continuous versus intermittent administration are surrounded by controversy. This prospective, randomised study was designed to compare two enteral feeding methods with respect to changes in levels of leptin and ghrelin in ICU.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 30, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 4, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 29, 2016

Status Verified

March 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

October 30, 2014

Last Update Submit

March 28, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

leptin levelsghrelin levels

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change from baseline in serum leptin concentration at three weeks in ICU

    first, 7th, 14th and 21th day

  • Change from baseline in serum ghrelin concentration at three weeks in ICU

    first, 7th, 14th and 21th day in ICU

Study Arms (2)

intermittent feeding

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Bolus infusion - The total daily feeding period was also 4-6 times a day.

Other: enteral feeding by nasogastric tube.

continuous feeding

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Continuous infusion - The daily desired amount was offered continuously for 20 hours a day.

Other: enteral feeding by nasogastric tube.

Interventions

method of administration enteral feeding by nasogastric tube.

continuous feedingintermittent feeding

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • who were unable to ingest an oral diet
  • given decision on enteral feeding

You may not qualify if:

  • Carcinomatosis
  • irreversible coma
  • death or discharge before 14 days of observation
  • contraindication to enteral feeding
  • intolerance to the prescribed nutrients or infusion regimen
  • burn
  • multiple trauma
  • morbid obesity
  • end stage liver or renal or lung disease
  • severe sepsis or septic shock
  • patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
  • immunosuppressive drug use
  • severe hemodynamic instability
  • massive blood transfusion

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Anesthesiology and Reanimation Dept. Ordu University Training and Research Hospital

Altinordu, Ordu, 52100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2014

First Posted

November 4, 2014

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

February 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 29, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-03

Locations