Efficacy and Safety of 4-aminopyridine on Cognitive Performance and Motor Function of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Twenty four relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients over the age of 18, with similar degree of disability, and with an evolution of at last 6 months, who are in first-line immunomodulatory therapy and have a stable disease (no more than one outbreak per year) will be included in the present study. Patients will be administered a neuropsychological test battery selected for this study and divided into two sessions of one and a half-hour each. Emotional state will be assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory in a different session. Cognitive impairment is defined as the alteration of two or more neuropsychological tests. Patients will be divided randomly into two groups where one will receive placebo and the other one 4-Aminopyridine (4-AP) for a period of 22 weeks in increasing doses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 multiple-sclerosis
Started Oct 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 31, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 12, 2019
CompletedSeptember 12, 2019
February 1, 2017
1.3 years
October 10, 2014
February 16, 2017
August 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
The Brief Repeatable Battery of Rao
Neuropsychological tests to assess: verbal fluency. Participants have to say as many words as possible from a category in a given time 60 Sec (F, A, S) Max score 72 and min score 19 words. Higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance.
10-15 minutes
Integrated Program of Neuropsychological Exploration Test Barcelona
Integrated Program of Neuropsychological Exploration Test Barcelona: Digit Span Forward (DSF), (attention spam and improved scoring metrics significantly enhance the precision of DSF assessments of short-term verbal memory). Digit sequences are presented beginning with a length of two digits and two trials are presented at each increasing list length. Max score 8 and min score 0 digits. Higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance.
7-10 min
Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF)
The purpose of this test is to assess visual-spatial constructional ability and visual memory. The time required to copy the drawing is recorded. Less time indicates a better performance and more time indicates a worse outcome (min score 60 and max score 300 seconds).
10-15 minutes
Five Digit Test (FDT). Processing Speed
Processing speed information (which includes reading, count, and alternation speed). Cards with a different number of stimuli are shown to the patient, who has to read, count, and respond to a change of instructions (alternation). Reading speed (min 12, max 31+ seconds), counting speed (min 14, max 28+ seconds), and alternation speed (min 26, max 56+ seconds) are recorded. Less speed corresponds to a better outcome.
8-10 min
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)
Is used primarily to assess perseveration and abstract thinking, allows the clinician to assess the following 'frontal' lobe functions: strategic planning, organised searching, utilising environmental feedback to shift cognitive sets, directing behaviour toward achieving a goal. WCST measures abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 128 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only "right" or "wrong" to each placement. The examiner may change matching rules during the test. Perseveration errors occur when subject repeats the same error no matter how many times they are told the placement is wrong. Higher scores indicate a worse cognitive performance (min=0-3, max=58-126)
10-15 minutes
Color Trails Test (CTT)
Measure sustained attention. The CTT uses numbered coloured circles and universal sign language symbols. The circles are printed with vivid pink or yellow backgrounds that are perceptible to colourblind individuals. For the Colour Trails 1 trial, the respondent uses a pencil to rapidly connect circles numbered 1 through 25 in sequence. Less time indicates better performance (min=10, max= 240).
5-8 minutes
Tower Of London (TOL). Total Moves and Total Correct Moves
Measures higher order problem-solving ability. The information it provides is not only useful when assessing frontal lobe damage, but also when evaluating attention disorders and executive functioning difficulties. The administrator arranges red, green, and blue beads on a peg board to match the configuration in the diagram. The patient is asked to replicate the configuration on a second peg board. Scores are calculated for Total Correct Moves and Total Moves. Total moves: higher scores indicate a worse cognitive performance (min= 0, max=58+); Total correct higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance (min=0, max=10).
25-30 minutes
Tower Of London (TOL). Execution Time and Problem-solving Time
Measures higher-order problem-solving ability. The information it provides is not only useful when assessing frontal lobe damage, but also when evaluating attention disorders and executive functioning difficulties. The administrator arranges red, green, and blue beads on a peg board to match the configuration in the diagram. The patient is asked to replicate the configuration on a second peg board. Scores are calculated for Total Execution Time (since the patient performs the first move until he ends the test), Total Problem-Solving Time (the sum of planning and execution times). Total execution time higher scores indicate a worse outcome (min= 0-78, max=564+ seconds), Total problem-solving time higher scores indicate a worse outcome (min= 0-56, max=500+ seconds).
25-30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Improved Physical Capacity
15-20 minutes
Fatigue
10 minutes
Walk
5-10 minutes
Number of Participants With Abnormal Studies
22 weeks
Study Arms (2)
4-aminopyridine treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATOR4-aminopyridine is given as gelatin capsules containing 4-aminopyridine 10 mg and microcrystalline cellulose as the excipient. Each patient will take two capsules every 8 hours after meals, for a total of 6 capsules/day. The 4-aminopyridine dosage will increase 10 mg/4 weeks by substitution of placebo instead of 4-aminopyridine capsules; such that patients will receive from 40 to 60 mg. distribute in 6capsules/day throughout the study.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients randomized to the placebo sequence will receive placebo for 20 weeks after the run-in period. They will be blinded to the fact that they are taking placebo, and capsules will be identical in appearance to the intervention capsules.
Interventions
Each patient will take two capsules every 8 hours after meals, for a total of 6 capsules/day. The 4-aminopyridine dosage will increase 10 mg/4 weeks by substitution of placebo instead of 4-aminopyridine capsules; such that patients will receive from 40 to 60 mg. distribute in 6capsules/day throughout the study.
The placebo arm will include Microcrystalline Cellulose placebo
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Relapsing recurrent MS with an evolution of at last 6 months before the study began.
- Both males and females, aged 20 - 65 years
- Neurologic Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 3 - 7
- Who are in first-line immunomodulatory therapy and have a stable disease
- No more than one outbreak per year.
- The absence of antiepileptic antecedent and electroencephalogram without epileptic activity.
- For females: postmenopausal or surgically sterile, or using an acceptable method of birth control
You may not qualify if:
- History of cardiovascular disease (syncope, arrhythmia, or myocardial infarction within the last two years), systolic blood pressure greater than 150 or less than 70 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure greater than 110 or less than 50 mm Hg, or heart rate greater than 110 or less than 50 beats/minute; impaired hepatic function (total hepatic enzyme or bilirubin levels greater than 2 times the upper limits of normal) or impaired renal function (creatinine level greater than 2 times the upper limits of normal) less than 6 months before the study
- Known allergy to pyridine-containing drugs
- Neurologic, degenerative, or psychiatric disorders that would impair the patient's ability to complete the protocol
- Any illness or abnormality that would jeopardize patient safety or interfere with the conduct of the study
- History of substance abuse
- Inability to discontinue excluded concomitant drug therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital de Especialidades, CMN Siglo XXI
Mexico City, Mexico City, 06725, Mexico
Related Publications (6)
Ruck T, Bittner S, Simon OJ, Gobel K, Wiendl H, Schilling M, Meuth SG. Long-term effects of dalfampridine in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2014 Feb 15;337(1-2):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
PMID: 24290498BACKGROUNDAmato MP, Portaccio E, Zipoli V. Are there protective treatments for cognitive decline in MS? J Neurol Sci. 2006 Jun 15;245(1-2):183-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.07.017. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
PMID: 16643949BACKGROUNDRomani A, Bergamaschi R, Candeloro E, Alfonsi E, Callieco R, Cosi V. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: multidimensional assessment and response to symptomatic treatment. Mult Scler. 2004 Aug;10(4):462-8. doi: 10.1191/1352458504ms1051oa.
PMID: 15327047BACKGROUNDRossini PM, Pasqualetti P, Pozzilli C, Grasso MG, Millefiorini E, Graceffa A, Carlesimo GA, Zibellini G, Caltagirone C. Fatigue in progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of oral 4-aminopyridine. Mult Scler. 2001 Dec;7(6):354-8. doi: 10.1177/135245850100700602.
PMID: 11795455BACKGROUNDSmits RC, Emmen HH, Bertelsmann FW, Kulig BM, van Loenen AC, Polman CH. The effects of 4-aminopyridine on cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Neurology. 1994 Sep;44(9):1701-5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.9.1701.
PMID: 7936300BACKGROUNDArreola-Mora C, Silva-Pereyra J, Fernandez T, Paredes-Cruz M, Bertado-Cortes B, Grijalva I. Effects of 4-aminopyridine on attention and executive functions of patients with multiple sclerosis: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Preliminary report. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Feb;28:117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.12.026. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
PMID: 30593980DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
As the sample size is very small, it is recommended to increase the number of patients. The heterogeneity in cognitive processes would imply a greater restriction criteria in the selection of patients to avoid the ceiling effect.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Israel Grijalva
- Organization
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Neurológicas.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claudia Arreola Mora, MS
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Israel Grijalva, PhD
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 10, 2014
First Posted
October 31, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 12, 2019
Results First Posted
September 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share