Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: a Long Term Registry
SATURNO
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: a Long Term Registry on Potential Benefits of the Different Surgical Techniques
1 other identifier
observational
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to assess in a "real life" case list the outcome of three different surgical approaches for isolated aortic valve surgery in terms of surgery times, morbidity and mortality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2014
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedSeptember 13, 2023
July 1, 2022
8.1 years
October 27, 2014
September 11, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Cardiopulmonary bypass time
during surgery
Total duration of Intensive Care Unit stay
during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks
Blood transfusions
during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
renal insufficiency
during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks
Prolonged ventilation
during hospital stay
Re-exploration for bleeding
during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks
sepsis
during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks
Neurological complications
during hospital stay, usually lasting one to two weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
upper mini-sternotomy
aortic valve replacement surgery via upper J or T sternotomy (ministernotomy)
right mini thoracotomy
aortic valve replacement/repair surgery via right mini thoracotomy
conventional sternotomy
aortic valve replacement surgery via conventional full sternotomy
Interventions
aortic valve replacement with either biological prosthetic valve or mechanical valve
aortic valve replacement with either biological prosthetic valve or mechanical valve
aortic valve replacement with either biological prosthetic valve or mechanical valve
Eligibility Criteria
patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery
You may qualify if:
- All patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery
- Written Informed consent to the use of personal data
You may not qualify if:
- other associated cardiac surgery
- emergency surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Maria Cecilia Hospitallead
- Ettore Sansavini Health Science Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Maria Cecilia Hospital
Cotignola, Ravenna, 48010, Italy
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elisa Mikus, MD
Maria Cecilia Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2014
First Posted
October 30, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
September 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-07