NCT02272023

Brief Summary

A Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) is proposed to compare a 9-session model of intensive motivational interviewing (IMI) to standard motivational interviewing techniques (SMI) among alcohol dependent women. Preliminary work studying 87 women randomly assigned to IMI or a standard single session of motivational interviewing showed significantly better drinking outcomes for women in the IMI condition at 4- and 6-month follow-up. Interestingly, mean trajectories for women assigned to IMI showed continuing declines in drinking problems during and after treatment. Differences between study conditions grew larger between 4-month (p\<.05) and 6-month (p\<.01) follow-up and the effect size at 6 months was medium to large (Cohen's d=0.63) The study will use mixed model quantitative and qualitative methods to respond to the PA's call for studies assessing mechanisms of change. Unlike many previous studies of SMI, we will employ limited exclusion criteria and will enroll participants who present with co-existing drug and psychiatric disorders. Procedures for the proposed study draw from our current successful RCT assessing IMI for methamphetamine (MA) dependence. Successful aspects of the current study include achievement of recruitment goals, strong adherence to the treatment and research protocols, and excellent rates for follow-up interviews (\>90%). The proposed study will take place at the same outpatient treatment program as the current study, New Leaf Treatment Center in Lafayette, California. Participants will include 220 alcohol dependent women who will be randomly assigned to IMI or SMI. Those in SMI will also receive an attention component (nutrition education) to achieve time equivalence between the two study conditions. Participants in both groups will receive standard weekly group treatment offered at the program. In addition, referrals to Alcoholics Anonymous will be provided to all participants. The primary outcomes will be measures of drinking, heavy drinking (4+ drinks), and severity of alcohol problems assessed at baseline and 2, 6, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes will include Addiction Severity Index scales, psychiatric problems, and symptoms of trauma. The study will include standard quantitative testing of potential mediators, including, the therapeutic alliance, self-efficacy, motivation, satisfaction, and use of outside services. However, the application also proposes an innovative use of qualitative procedures to identify unrecognized factors influencing outcome.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
215

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 20, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2015

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2019

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 7, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 18, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4.1 years

First QC Date

October 20, 2014

Last Update Submit

September 17, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

alcoholwomenmotivational interviewing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in the number of drinks and frequency of drinks in the past two months

    Change in daily drinking patterns (quantity and frequency) over the past two months using the Timeline follow-back assessment

    Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months

  • Change in the severity of alcohol use within past 30 days

    Change in alcohol Addiction Severity Index (ASI) scores in the past 30 days

    Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in employment, psychiatric status, and legal status over the past 30 days

    Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months

  • Change in mental health

    Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months

  • Change in trauma and stress levels

    Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months

Study Arms (2)

9 sessions of Intensive Motivational Interviewing

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental condition will consist of 9 1-hour intensive motivational interviewing sessions.

Behavioral: Intensive Motivational Interviewing

1 Standard Motivational Interview plus 8 nutrition classes

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The standard MI intervention will consist of a commonly used, single session of MI (50 minutes) plus 8 hours of nutrition education to achieve time and attention equivalence of study conditions.

Behavioral: Single session of Motivational Interviewing

Interventions

Weekly individual therapy sessions over 9 weeks (Intensive MI condition) consisting of supportive and directive interventions. The control condition consists on a single session of MI and nutritional education.

9 sessions of Intensive Motivational Interviewing
1 Standard Motivational Interview plus 8 nutrition classes

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \) Female 2)18 years or older 3) meets DSM-V criteria for current alcohol use disorder in the past 30 days, as assessed by the DSM-V Checklist, defined as 2 or more criterion 4) alcohol in the past 30 days and medically cleared by NLTC medical personnel 5) able to speak and read English, 6) capable of giving informed consent 7) likely to be in the area the next 12 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • has had alcohol in the past 3 days and may require medical treatment for alcohol or drug detoxification and is not followed by a physician or has not been medically cleared by NLTC medical personnel
  • or has unmet needs for treatment of serious medical or psychiatric conditions
  • any condition that would impair their ability to provide informed consent
  • current severe drug use disorder, defined as 6 or more DSM-V criteria in the past 30 days, 5.)Currently enrolled in alcohol or drug treatment
  • \) Does not meet DSM-V criteria for current alcohol use disorder as assessed by the DSM-V Checklist, 7) Refuses to sign HIPPA authorization form 8) Any medical or psychosocial condition that would preclude safe, useful, or consistent participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

New Leaf Treatment Center

Lafayette, California, 94549, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola M. The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Oct;71(5):843-61. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.843.

    PMID: 14516234BACKGROUND
  • Carroll KM, Ball SA, Nich C, Martino S, Frankforter TL, Farentinos C, Kunkel LE, Mikulich-Gilbertson SK, Morgenstern J, Obert JL, Polcin D, Snead N, Woody GE; National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network. Motivational interviewing to improve treatment engagement and outcome in individuals seeking treatment for substance abuse: a multisite effectiveness study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Feb 28;81(3):301-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Sep 28.

    PMID: 16169159BACKGROUND
  • Downey L, Rosengren DB, Donovan DM. Sources of motivation for abstinence: a replication analysis of the reasons for quitting questionnaire. Addict Behav. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):79-89. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00090-3.

    PMID: 11196294BACKGROUND
  • Dunn C, Deroo L, Rivara FP. The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: a systematic review. Addiction. 2001 Dec;96(12):1725-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961217253.x.

    PMID: 11784466BACKGROUND
  • Hettema J, Steele J, Miller WR. Motivational interviewing. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:91-111. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143833.

    PMID: 17716083BACKGROUND
  • Miller WR, Yahne CE, Tonigan JS. Motivational interviewing in drug abuse services: a randomized trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Aug;71(4):754-63. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.754.

    PMID: 12924680BACKGROUND
  • Mullins SM, Suarez M, Ondersma SJ, Page MC. The impact of motivational interviewing on substance abuse treatment retention: a randomized control trial of women involved with child welfare. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004 Jul;27(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.03.010.

    PMID: 15223094BACKGROUND
  • Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol. 1997 Jan;58(1):7-29.

    PMID: 8979210BACKGROUND
  • Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH three-year drinking outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Sep;22(6):1300-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03912.x.

    PMID: 9756046BACKGROUND
  • Schneider RJ, Casey J, Kohn R. Motivational versus confrontational interviewing: a comparison of substance abuse assessment practices at employee assistance programs. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2000 Feb;27(1):60-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02287804.

    PMID: 10695241BACKGROUND
  • Sellman JD, Sullivan PF, Dore GM, Adamson SJ, MacEwan I. A randomized controlled trial of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) for mild to moderate alcohol dependence. J Stud Alcohol. 2001 May;62(3):389-96. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.389.

    PMID: 11414349BACKGROUND
  • Winhusen T, Kropp F, Babcock D, Hague D, Erickson SJ, Renz C, Rau L, Lewis D, Leimberger J, Somoza E. Motivational enhancement therapy to improve treatment utilization and outcome in pregnant substance users. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Sep;35(2):161-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

    PMID: 18083322BACKGROUND
  • Miller WR. What really drives change? Addiction. 1993 Nov;88(11):1479-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb03133.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8286993BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alcoholism

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Alcohol-Related DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Douglas Polcin, Ed.D.

    Alcohol Research Group / Public Health Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2014

First Posted

October 22, 2014

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2019

Study Completion

March 7, 2019

Last Updated

September 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Locations