NCT02271035

Brief Summary

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the most common urologic diagnosis in neonates estimated at 1% of newborns, and 30-45% of the children who present with urinary tract infection (1). Optional treatments of children with VUR include conservative therapy with or without prophylactic antibiotics, and endoscopic, laparoscopic, or open surgery. In an endoscopic technique, the injecting needle is inserted through the working channel of the cystoscope. The procedure is relatively short and is performed as out-patient surgery. In 2000, Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (DefluxR) was approved by the FDA, and subsequently has become the treatment of choice in VUR grades 2-4. In 2004, the hydrodistention-implantation technique (HIT) was introduced by Kirsch. HIT involves the use of a pressurized stream of fluid directed into the ureter to aid visualization, and injection into the submucosa within the ureteric tunnel to improve coaptation of the ureter (3). One of the disadvantages attributed to Deflux is the loss of 20% of the injected material over time (a result of absorption of the hyaluronic acid), which may explain the lower success rate of the endoscopic treatment of VUR compared with open surgery. In 2005, Polyacrylate Polyalcohol (VantrisR), a non- absorbable chemical preparation was introduced for endoscopic treatment of VUR, aiming to improve on the results of Deflux by preventing volume loss. Preliminary results of a three year follow-up using Vantris have shown high a level of reflux resolution(4). The aim of the current study is to compare the rate of resolution of the VUR using Deflux versus Vantris in bilateral VUR

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2013

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2014

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2014

Status Verified

June 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

August 15, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 21, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

VUR

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • rate of resolution of VUR using Vantris vs.Deflux

    2 years

Study Arms (2)

Deflux

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In each patient, Deflux will be injected into one of the ureteral orifices using the the HIT technique.

Drug: Deflux

Vantris

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Vantris will be injected into the other ureteral orifice using the same technique and the same amount of implant.

Drug: Vantris

Interventions

DefluxDRUG

Deflux will be injected through the working channel of the cystoscope using a special needle into the submucosal space of the ureteral orifice (Deflux to one ureteral orifice and Vantris to the other side). The technique that will be used is HIT (Hydrodistention Implantation Technique)+ STING

Also known as: Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid
Deflux

vantris will be injected through the working channel of the cystoscope using a special needle into the submucosal space of the ureteral orifice (Deflux to one Vantris to the other side). The technique that will be used is HIT (Hydrodistention Implantation Technique)+ STING

Also known as: Polyacrylate Polyalcohol copolymer
Vantris

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Bilateral VUR of the same grade

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to apply the same technique on both ureteral orifices

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Schneider Medical Center of Israel

Petah Tikva, Israel, Israel

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vesico-Ureteral Reflux

Interventions

defluxdextranomerHyaluronic AcidVantrispolyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GlycosaminoglycansPolysaccharidesCarbohydrates

Study Officials

  • David Ben-Meir, MD

    Investigator

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

David Ben-Meir, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2013

First Posted

October 22, 2014

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

October 22, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-06

Locations