A Prospective Study Comparing the Success Rate of Injection of (DefluxR) Versus (VantrisR) for VUR in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the most common urologic diagnosis in neonates estimated at 1% of newborns, and 30-45% of the children who present with urinary tract infection (1). Optional treatments of children with VUR include conservative therapy with or without prophylactic antibiotics, and endoscopic, laparoscopic, or open surgery. In an endoscopic technique, the injecting needle is inserted through the working channel of the cystoscope. The procedure is relatively short and is performed as out-patient surgery. In 2000, Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (DefluxR) was approved by the FDA, and subsequently has become the treatment of choice in VUR grades 2-4. In 2004, the hydrodistention-implantation technique (HIT) was introduced by Kirsch. HIT involves the use of a pressurized stream of fluid directed into the ureter to aid visualization, and injection into the submucosa within the ureteric tunnel to improve coaptation of the ureter (3). One of the disadvantages attributed to Deflux is the loss of 20% of the injected material over time (a result of absorption of the hyaluronic acid), which may explain the lower success rate of the endoscopic treatment of VUR compared with open surgery. In 2005, Polyacrylate Polyalcohol (VantrisR), a non- absorbable chemical preparation was introduced for endoscopic treatment of VUR, aiming to improve on the results of Deflux by preventing volume loss. Preliminary results of a three year follow-up using Vantris have shown high a level of reflux resolution(4). The aim of the current study is to compare the rate of resolution of the VUR using Deflux versus Vantris in bilateral VUR
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Oct 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 22, 2014
June 1, 2014
1 year
August 15, 2013
October 21, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
rate of resolution of VUR using Vantris vs.Deflux
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Deflux
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn each patient, Deflux will be injected into one of the ureteral orifices using the the HIT technique.
Vantris
ACTIVE COMPARATORVantris will be injected into the other ureteral orifice using the same technique and the same amount of implant.
Interventions
Deflux will be injected through the working channel of the cystoscope using a special needle into the submucosal space of the ureteral orifice (Deflux to one ureteral orifice and Vantris to the other side). The technique that will be used is HIT (Hydrodistention Implantation Technique)+ STING
vantris will be injected through the working channel of the cystoscope using a special needle into the submucosal space of the ureteral orifice (Deflux to one Vantris to the other side). The technique that will be used is HIT (Hydrodistention Implantation Technique)+ STING
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bilateral VUR of the same grade
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to apply the same technique on both ureteral orifices
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Schneider Medical Center of Israel
Petah Tikva, Israel, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Ben-Meir, MD
Investigator
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2013
First Posted
October 22, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 22, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-06