NCT02269657

Brief Summary

The EOS® imaging system, a new imaging modality which offers low dose, weight bearing and full body X-ray imaging, requires a new standing position where patients put their hands and forearms on the wall vertically for stability. Although this method provides enough support for the patients during the extended X-ray acquisition time, its impact on the postural balance and sagittal profile of the spine and sacro-pelvic parameters has not been evaluated. The goal of this study is to identify the impact of patients' arm positioning on the sagittal profile and postural balance of the patient and subsequently propose a standardized method for full spine X-ray acquisition in the EOS® imaging system.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
37

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 13, 2014

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 21, 2014

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2014

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 13, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

February 13, 2017

Status Verified

December 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

October 13, 2014

Results QC Date

December 21, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 21, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

ScoliosisPostural balanceLordosisKyphosisX-rays

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Spinal Sagittal Plane Parameters

    Spinal (coronal and sagittal) and sacro-pelvic parameters were used to evaluate the equivalence between the spinal and pelvic parameters in the two arm positions.

    Up to 30 minutes

  • Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Frontal Spinal Plane Parameters

    Spinal (coronal and sagittal) and sacro-pelvic parameters were used to evaluate the equivalence between the spinal and pelvic parameters in the two arm positions.

    Up to 30 minutes

  • Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Transverse Plane Parameters

    Spinal (coronal and sagittal) and sacro-pelvic parameters were used to evaluate the equivalence between the spinal and pelvic parameters in the two arm positions.

    Up to 30 minutes

  • Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Pelvic Sagittal Plane Parameters

    Spinal (coronal and sagittal) and sacro-pelvic parameters were used to evaluate the equivalence between the spinal and pelvic parameters in the two arm positions.

    Up to 30 minutes

  • Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Pressure Mat Parameters

    Spinal (coronal and sagittal) and sacro-pelvic parameters were used to evaluate the equivalence between the spinal and pelvic parameters in the two arm positions. Images were only recorded during the wall and clavicle position, not during the natural standing position. Pressure mat parameters were recorded for both arm positions and compared to the natural standing position (arms hanging on either side).

    Up to 30 minutes

Study Arms (1)

Subject Cohort

Two bi-planar full spinal X-rays will be taken using the EOS® imaging system with subjects standing in two different positions. The first x-ray will be taken while the subject's hands and forearms in front of them on the wall vertically. A second image will be taken while the subject's knuckles loosely placed on ipsi-lateral clavicles. A pressure mat will record the magnitude of pressure under the subjects' feet during each set of images. A third set of pressure mat recordings will be obtained while the subject is in a natural standing position with both arms hanging on either side (no x-ray images will be taking in this position).

Device: EOS® imaging system

Interventions

The EOS® imaging system is a low dose, 3-dimensional imaging system that provides weight bearing images which provide visual information with respect to the interaction between the joints and the rest of the musculoskeletal system, particularly the spine, hips and legs. The imaging system is used for clinical purposes with additional images captured as part of this study to collect data from subjects in two different arm positions during imaging.

Subject Cohort

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Outpatient adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients visiting the orthopedic clinic at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia who require bi-plannar full spine x-ray imaging for clinical purposes.

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects age 10-18
  • Diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  • Prescribed bi-planar full spine X-ray images
  • Must be able to stand still for 10 seconds without any support
  • Must be able to follow verbal and visual instruction

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous surgical treatment
  • Diagnosis of a neuro-muscular disorder
  • Have supernumerary vertebrae, congenital deformities, spondylolisthesis, or spina bifida
  • Have any other musculoskeletal disorder that impacts standing balance such as hip, knee, ankle pain and instability or lower back pain
  • BMI higher than 30
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Parents/guardians or subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, may be non-compliant with study schedules or procedures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ScoliosisLordosisKyphosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal CurvaturesSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Saba Pasha, PhD
Organization
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Study Officials

  • Saba Pasha, PhD

    Children's Surgical Associates

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2014

First Posted

October 21, 2014

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion

August 1, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

February 13, 2017

Results First Posted

February 13, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Identifiable pressure mat data from select subjects that is recorded during this study will be shared with investigators at this institution working on another approved study which requires pre-surgical pressure mat data. Many subjects in the companion study will have already undergone surgery, yet none in the current study will have at the time pressure mat data is recorded. Thus this data will be shared. Data will be stored in a password protected file on a secure shared drive and is only accessible by IRB-approved members of the current and companion study teams.

Locations