A Prospective Study on USS Assessment of Pelvic Structures in 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy Versus Delivery Outcome
PLUSSMODEL
1 other identifier
interventional
135
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed study is to evaluate if there are specific factors in the pelvic floor functional anatomy which can predict the ability of having a vaginal birth after caesarean section. Physical characteristics of the soft tissue in the female pelvis play an important role in successful vaginal delivery. A "tight" or less distensible pelvic floor muscles may influence mode of delivery, leading to poor labour progression and by compressing foetal head produce CTG abnormality such as decelerations, both resulting in caesarean delivery. One of the main structures of the pelvic floor, the puborectoalis muscle, facilitates the passage of fetal head through the birth canal by stretching and distending. Therefore distensibility of the female pelvic floor influences mode of delivery. Three hundred patients, in the third trimester of pregnancy, will be recruited via the antenatal clinics to minimize any disruption in their pregnancy care provision. Eligible participants are pregnant women who had either one or no vaginal births, or one caesarean section and who can give an informed consent and maintain their autonomy regarding mode of delivery with understanding of the forthcoming study results. Participants will be excluded if they sustain any obstetric complications that may impede on time and mode of delivery including an emergency prelabour caesarean section. Ultrasonographic assessment of the differences in the pelvic characteristics of these women will be used to predict a successful of trial of vaginal delivery after caesarean section (VBAC) in subsequent pregnancies. The results will be used to better inform whether there is a simple (single ultrasound assessment) that can be used to help inform women's choice regarding mode of delivery. Results from this research could be a pioneering blueprint for further studies, as there is very little known about this topic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedJuly 28, 2015
July 1, 2015
8 months
October 9, 2014
July 26, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
vaginal delivery
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
voiding problems
12 months
Study Arms (3)
nulliparous women
ACTIVE COMPARATORinternal ultrasound in the 3rd trimester uroflow meter in 3rd trimester
parous women
EXPERIMENTALthose who had vaginal delivery in the past; internal ultrasound in the 3rd trimester uroflow meter in 3rd trimester
parous women - VBAC
EXPERIMENTALthose with previous LSCS and no vaginal births; internal ultrasound in the 3rd trimester uroflow meter in 3rd trimester
Interventions
uroflow meter: measurement of passed urine volume
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking women
- over 16 years old women
- women willing to provide written informed consent
- women who had either prior vaginal delivery or caesarean section or no prior birth experience
You may not qualify if:
- Women who cannot give an informed consent,
- under the age of consent,
- any participants whose pregnancies complicated during the antenatal period that may influence decision on time and mode of delivery that is anyone who has to undergo an emergency prelabour LSCS,
- nonEnglish speaking women
- less than 16 years old women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham, B29 6SN, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Kelly Hard
R&D Dept, Birmingham Women's Hospital, UK
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- DR ANETA OBLOZA
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2014
First Posted
October 15, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07