TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep and Perlane-L® for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Within-Subject, Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study of TEOSYAL® RHA (Resilient Hyaluronic Acid) Ultra Deep Versus Perlane-L® in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep versus Perlane-L® in the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds. This is a controlled, randomized, double-blinded, within subject (split-face), multicenter, prospective clinical study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 27, 2018
CompletedMarch 27, 2018
February 1, 2018
9 months
September 25, 2014
November 21, 2017
February 27, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Non-inferiority of the Delta of the WSRS Score Between W24 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep Versus Perlane-L® for the Correction of Moderate to Severe Naso-Labial Folds Based on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Score Assessed by the BLE.
WSRS (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) is a validated 5-point scale with 1 being 'absent' and 5 being 'extreme'. BLE =Blinded Live Evaluator
Baseline and 24 weeks after last treatment
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Post Injection Treatment Responses (From Common Treatment Responses (CTR) Diary) for Safety Evaluation of TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep Versus Perlane-L®
During 14 days after initial treatment (D0) and touch-up (2 weeks)
Assessment of Injection Site Pain (Visual Analog Scale) of TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep Versus Perlane-L®
During Injection and 5, 15, 30 minutes post-injection
Delta of the WSRS Score Between W24,36,52 and 64 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep Versus Perlane-L® for the Correction of Moderate to Severe NLFs Based on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Score Assessed by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE)
Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 64
Delta of the WSRS Score Between W2,4,12,24,36,52,64 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep Versus Perlane-L® for the Correction of Moderate to Severe NLFs Based on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Score Assessed by the Treating Investigator (TI)
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64
Percentage of Responders Based on the Intra-individual Improvement of at Least One Grade in the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Compared to Baseline Assessed by the BLE
Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 64
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Left side TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep, Right side Perlane-L®
EXPERIMENTALSplit-face injection of TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep into the left Naso Labial Folds (NLFs) and Perlane-L® into the right NLF (n=120). Up to 3.0 mL injected per NLF. Touch-up treatment provided at 2 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per NLF).
Left side Perlane-L®, Right side TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep
EXPERIMENTALSplit-face injection of Perlane-L® into the left Naso Labial Folds (NLFs) and TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep into the right NLF (n=120). Up to 3.0 mL injected per NLF. Touch-up treatment provided at 2 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per NLF).
Interventions
A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus equi bacteria, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/mL and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer. It is supplied in individual treatment syringes with 27Gauge ½" disposable sterile needles.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Outpatient, male or female of any race, 22 years of age or older; female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative Urine Pregnancy Test and practice a reliable method of contraception;
- NLFs classified as WSRS grade 3 or 4 (same score for each side);
- Willing to abstain from facial aesthetic procedures/therapies that could interfere with study evaluations;
- Able to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits;
- Signed informed consent and HIPAA form.
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects that are pregnant, breast-feeding or of childbearing potential and not practicing reliable birth control;
- Known hypersensitivity/allergy to any component of the study devices;
- Known sensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type, history of multiple severe allergies, history of anaphylactic shock;
- Known susceptibility to keloid formation, hypertrophic scarring or clinically significant skin pigmentation disorders;
- Clinically significant active skin disease within 6 months;
- History of active chronic debilitating systemic disease;
- History of connective tissue disease;
- History of malignancy (excl. non-melanoma skin cancer) within past 5 years;
- History of bleeding disorders;
- Need for clinically significant and continuous medical treatment within 2 weeks prior to first visit;
- Received/used a prohibited treatment/procedure within certain time periods (e.g., bioresorbable fillers, NSAIDS, ASA, high dose vitamin E, corticosteroids, interferon, anti-coagulation therapies, laser/light therapies, botulinum toxin injections (frontalis and glabella complex treatment permitted), prescription strength topical retinoids, facial peels, excisional facial surgery, clinically significant oral or maxillofacial surgery).
- Evidence of clinically significant alcohol or drug abuse, or history of poor cooperation, non-compliance with medical treatment, or unreliability
- Exhibit a physical attribute(s) that may prevent assessment or treatment of NLFs such as excessive facial hair, traumatic or surgical facial scars, and/or excessive hyperpigmentation in the treatment areas.
- A condition or situation that may put the subject at significant risk, confound the study results, or significantly interfere with the subject participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Teoxane SAlead
- ethica Clinical Research Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (4)
United States
Beverly Hills, California, United States
United States
Bradenton, Florida, United States
United States
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
United States
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Project Manager
- Organization
- Teoxane
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2014
First Posted
October 1, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 27, 2018
Results First Posted
March 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02