TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action, TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines, and Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Within-Subject, Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action and TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
1 other identifier
interventional
148
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is 1) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC, and 2) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC, in the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 26, 2018
CompletedApril 25, 2018
March 1, 2018
9 months
July 15, 2014
November 21, 2017
March 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Non-inferiority of the Delta of TEOSYAL® RHA GA and TEOSYAL® RHA DL Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Moderate to Severe NLFs Based on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Score Assessed by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE).
TEOSYAL® RHA GA = TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action TEOSYAL® RHA DL = TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines WSRS (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) is a validated 5-point scale assessing wrinkle severity with 1 being 'absent' and 5 being 'extreme' BLE = Blinded Live Evaluator
Baseline and 24 weeks after last treatment
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Post Injection Treatment Responses (From Common Treatment Responses (CTR) Diary) for Safety Evaluation of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action (GA) and TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines (DL) Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC (J).
During 14 days after initial treatment (D0) and touch-up (2 weeks)
Assessment of Injection Site Pain (Visual Analog Scale) of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action (GA) and TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines (DL) Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC (J).
During Injection and 5, 15, 30 minutes post-injection
Delta of the WSRS Score Between W24,36,52 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA GA Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC and TEOSYAL® RHA DL Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Moderate to Severe NLFs Based on the WSRS Score Assessed by the BLE
Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 64
Delta of the WSRS Score Between W2,4,12,24,36,52,64 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA GA Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC and TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Moderate to Severe NLFs Based on the WSRS Score Assessed by the TI
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64
Percentage of Responders Based on the Intra-individual Improvement of at Least One Grade in the WSRS Compared to Baseline Assessed by the BLE
Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 64
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
TEOSYAL RHA Global Action/Juvederm Ultra XC
EXPERIMENTALSplit-face injection of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action into one NLF and Juvederm® Ultra XC into the contralateral NLF (n=75). Up to 3.0 mL injected per NLF (mid-dermis to deep-dermis). Touch-up treatment provided at 2 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per NLF).
TEOSYAL RHA Deep Lines/Juvederm Ultra XC
EXPERIMENTALSplit-face injection of TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines into one NLF and Juvederm® Ultra XC into the contralateral NLF (n=75). Up to 3.0 mL injected per NLF (mid-dermis to deep-dermis). Touch-up treatment provided at 2 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per NLF).
Interventions
A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus equi bacteria, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/mL and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer. It is supplied in individual treatment syringes with 30G1/2" disposable sterile needles.
A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus equi bacteria, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/mL and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer. It is supplied in individual treatment syringes with 27G1/2" disposable sterile needles.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Outpatient, male or female of any race, 22 years of age or older; female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test and practice a reliable method of contraception
- NLFs classified as WSRS grade 3 or 4 (same score for each side)
- Willing to abstain from facial aesthetic procedures/therapies that could interfere with study evaluations
- Able to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits;
- Signed informed consent and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) form
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects that are pregnant or breast-feeding, or of childbearing potential and not practicing reliable birth control
- Known hypersensitivity/allergy to any component of the study devices
- Known sensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type, history of multiple severe allergies, history of anaphylactic shock
- Known susceptibility to keloid formation, hypertrophic scarring or clinically significant skin pigmentation disorders
- Clinically significant active skin disease within 6 months
- History of active chronic debilitating systemic disease
- History of connective tissue disease
- History of malignancy (excl. non-melanoma skin cancer) within past 5 years
- History of bleeding disorders
- Need for clinically significant and continuous medical treatment within 2 weeks prior to first visit
- Received/used a prohibited treatment/procedure within certain time periods (e.g., bioresorbable fillers, NSAIDS, acetylsalicylic acid, high dose vitamin E, corticosteroids, interferon, anti-coagulation therapies, laser/light therapies, botulinum toxin injections (frontalis and glabella complex treatment permitted), prescription strength topical retinoids, facial peels, excisional facial surgery, clinically significant oral or maxillofacial surgery)
- Clinically significant alcohol or drug abuse, or history of poor cooperation, non-compliance with medical treatment, or unreliability
- Exhibit a physical attribute(s) that may prevent assessment or treatment of NLFs such as excessive facial hair, traumatic or surgical facial scars, and/or excessive hyperpigmentation in the treatment areas
- A condition or situation that may put the subject at significant risk, confound the study results, or significantly interfere with the subject participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Teoxane SAlead
- ethica Clinical Research Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (5)
United States, Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
United States, California
Beverly Hills, California, United States
United States, Santa Monica
Santa Monica, California, United States
United States, Florida
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
United States, Massachusetts
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Project Manager
- Organization
- Teoxane
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2014
First Posted
July 21, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 25, 2018
Results First Posted
March 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03