NCT02195427

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is 1) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC, and 2) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC, in the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
148

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2014

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2014

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2015

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2016

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 26, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 25, 2018

Status Verified

March 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

July 15, 2014

Results QC Date

November 21, 2017

Last Update Submit

March 26, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Nasolabial foldsDermal fillerHyaluronic acid (HA)Wrinkles

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Non-inferiority of the Delta of TEOSYAL® RHA GA and TEOSYAL® RHA DL Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Moderate to Severe NLFs Based on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Score Assessed by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE).

    TEOSYAL® RHA GA = TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action TEOSYAL® RHA DL = TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines WSRS (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) is a validated 5-point scale assessing wrinkle severity with 1 being 'absent' and 5 being 'extreme' BLE = Blinded Live Evaluator

    Baseline and 24 weeks after last treatment

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Post Injection Treatment Responses (From Common Treatment Responses (CTR) Diary) for Safety Evaluation of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action (GA) and TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines (DL) Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC (J).

    During 14 days after initial treatment (D0) and touch-up (2 weeks)

  • Assessment of Injection Site Pain (Visual Analog Scale) of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action (GA) and TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines (DL) Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC (J).

    During Injection and 5, 15, 30 minutes post-injection

  • Delta of the WSRS Score Between W24,36,52 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA GA Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC and TEOSYAL® RHA DL Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Moderate to Severe NLFs Based on the WSRS Score Assessed by the BLE

    Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 64

  • Delta of the WSRS Score Between W2,4,12,24,36,52,64 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA GA Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC and TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines Versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Moderate to Severe NLFs Based on the WSRS Score Assessed by the TI

    Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64

  • Percentage of Responders Based on the Intra-individual Improvement of at Least One Grade in the WSRS Compared to Baseline Assessed by the BLE

    Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 64

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

TEOSYAL RHA Global Action/Juvederm Ultra XC

EXPERIMENTAL

Split-face injection of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action into one NLF and Juvederm® Ultra XC into the contralateral NLF (n=75). Up to 3.0 mL injected per NLF (mid-dermis to deep-dermis). Touch-up treatment provided at 2 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per NLF).

Device: TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action

TEOSYAL RHA Deep Lines/Juvederm Ultra XC

EXPERIMENTAL

Split-face injection of TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines into one NLF and Juvederm® Ultra XC into the contralateral NLF (n=75). Up to 3.0 mL injected per NLF (mid-dermis to deep-dermis). Touch-up treatment provided at 2 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per NLF).

Device: TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines

Interventions

A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus equi bacteria, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/mL and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer. It is supplied in individual treatment syringes with 30G1/2" disposable sterile needles.

TEOSYAL RHA Global Action/Juvederm Ultra XC

A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus equi bacteria, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/mL and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer. It is supplied in individual treatment syringes with 27G1/2" disposable sterile needles.

TEOSYAL RHA Deep Lines/Juvederm Ultra XC

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Outpatient, male or female of any race, 22 years of age or older; female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test and practice a reliable method of contraception
  • NLFs classified as WSRS grade 3 or 4 (same score for each side)
  • Willing to abstain from facial aesthetic procedures/therapies that could interfere with study evaluations
  • Able to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits;
  • Signed informed consent and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) form

You may not qualify if:

  • Female subjects that are pregnant or breast-feeding, or of childbearing potential and not practicing reliable birth control
  • Known hypersensitivity/allergy to any component of the study devices
  • Known sensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type, history of multiple severe allergies, history of anaphylactic shock
  • Known susceptibility to keloid formation, hypertrophic scarring or clinically significant skin pigmentation disorders
  • Clinically significant active skin disease within 6 months
  • History of active chronic debilitating systemic disease
  • History of connective tissue disease
  • History of malignancy (excl. non-melanoma skin cancer) within past 5 years
  • History of bleeding disorders
  • Need for clinically significant and continuous medical treatment within 2 weeks prior to first visit
  • Received/used a prohibited treatment/procedure within certain time periods (e.g., bioresorbable fillers, NSAIDS, acetylsalicylic acid, high dose vitamin E, corticosteroids, interferon, anti-coagulation therapies, laser/light therapies, botulinum toxin injections (frontalis and glabella complex treatment permitted), prescription strength topical retinoids, facial peels, excisional facial surgery, clinically significant oral or maxillofacial surgery)
  • Clinically significant alcohol or drug abuse, or history of poor cooperation, non-compliance with medical treatment, or unreliability
  • Exhibit a physical attribute(s) that may prevent assessment or treatment of NLFs such as excessive facial hair, traumatic or surgical facial scars, and/or excessive hyperpigmentation in the treatment areas
  • A condition or situation that may put the subject at significant risk, confound the study results, or significantly interfere with the subject participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

United States, Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

United States, California

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Location

United States, Santa Monica

Santa Monica, California, United States

Location

United States, Florida

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Location

United States, Massachusetts

Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Project Manager
Organization
Teoxane

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2014

First Posted

July 21, 2014

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

March 1, 2015

Study Completion

March 1, 2016

Last Updated

April 25, 2018

Results First Posted

March 26, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-03

Locations