NCT02251106

Brief Summary

A recent province-wide survey (Alberta, Canada) suggests that clinicians' beliefs about soft lumbar bracing for low back pain (LBP) vary substantially. Approximately 50% of clinicians (MDs, DCs, PTs) find back braces "useful" for acute back pain while the remaining half report that bracing causes muscle atrophy. While previous studies suggest bracing for acute low back conditions can reduce pain and does not cause atrophy, no prior study has assessed back function after bracing using self-reported and objective measures within the same cohort. PURPOSE: To assess both self-reported and objective measures of spine function before, and after, use of an inelastic lumbar brace over a two week period. STUDY DESIGN: Before-After Design OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported spine function, spinal stiffness and muscle endurance. METHODS: Three groups were studied: asymptomatics who did not wear a brace (-LBP/-Brace), asymptomatics who were braced (-LBP/+Brace) and acute LBP subjects who were braced (+LBP/+Brace). Both groups of braced subjects (-LBP/+Brace; +LBP/+Brace) were instructed to wear the brace continually for 2 weeks with the exception of bedroom \& bathroom activities. Before and after the 2 week period, 3 measures of spine function were performed: spinal stiffness via motorized indentation of the L3 spinous process, a modified Sorensen test (timed lumbar extension against gravity), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Unbraced (-LBP/-Brace) subjects were studied over the same time with the same measures. Repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted for all three outcomes with a significance level of 0.05.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Typical duration for not_applicable low-back-pain

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2014

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 24, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2014

Completed
8.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 8, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 8, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

September 24, 2014

Results QC Date

January 25, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 8, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Oswestry Disability Index

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire is a self-reported measure of function that examines the perceived level of disability. The ODI is made up of 10 questions. Each question is scored from 0-5 (minimum to maximum) The point total from each section is summed and then divided by the total number of questions answered and multiplied by 100 to create a percentage disability. The scores range from 0-100% with lower scores meaning less disability. If one section is missed (or not applicable) the score is calculated: (Total scored) / (total possible score with section removed) x 100 = \_\_%

    2 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Modified Sorensen Test

    2 weeks

  • Bulk Spinal Stiffness

    2 weeks

  • Rehabilitation Ultrasound Imaging

    2 weeks

Study Arms (3)

-LBP/-Brace

NO INTERVENTION

Subjects in this arm did not have back pain nor did they wear brace (asymptomatic controls). Subjects had their spine function measured before and after a two week period.

-LBP/+Brace

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention = Lumbar corset (Quickdraw, Aspen Medical Products) Subjects in this arm did not have back pain but wore a brace for a two week period (asymptomatic intervention). Subjects had their spine function measured before and after a two week period.

Device: Lumbar corset (Quickdraw, Aspen Medical Products)

+LBP/+Brace

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention = Lumbar corset (Quickdraw, Aspen Medical Products) Subjects in this arm had back pain and wore a brace for a two week period (symptomatic intervention). Subjects had their spine function measured before and after a two week period.

Device: Lumbar corset (Quickdraw, Aspen Medical Products)

Interventions

The corset (a.k.a. brace) is made of webbing and elastic. It is wrapped around the trunk and tightened with Velcro and a series of cords (like tying shoes).

Also known as: Soft lumbar brace
+LBP/+Brace-LBP/+Brace

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects enrolled in the study will be between the ages of 18 and 65 and include both genders.
  • Asymptomatic subjects will be asymptomatic for low back pain for a period of 3 months or more.
  • Symptomatic subjects will have non-specific low back pain that is of an acute or chronic nature. Recruiting those with non-specific low back pain ensures that we are not enrolling subjects with a specific cause for back pain (eg, spinal fracture) for which spinal function testing is contraindicated.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Greg Kawchuk
Organization
University of Alberta

Study Officials

  • Greg N Kawchuk, PhD

    University of Alberta

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2014

First Posted

September 29, 2014

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

January 1, 2014

Study Completion

January 1, 2014

Last Updated

March 8, 2023

Results First Posted

March 8, 2023

Record last verified: 2022-03