Impact of Radiation Therapy on Breast Conservation in DCIS

NCT02248662 | Completed Results DMC

• 2 other identifiers: 12-420CE-12-11-4173
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 3,436
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 4

Brief Summary

Large regional variation exists in the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Although patients who do not receive initial radiotherapy for DCIS are candidates for subsequent BCS if they experience a second breast event, many undergo mastectomy instead.

Conditions

DCIS

Keywords

DCIS; PCORI; ductal carcinoma in situ; radiation; oncology; patient-centered; decision aid; decision-making

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Association Between Patient Characteristics and Three-Level Cluster of Treatment Intensity for Primary DCIS

  The investigators defined treatment intensity in a health services area to be the proportion of patients undergoing breast conserving surgery for DCIS who receive radiation therapy. Because a proportion is challenging to analyze statistically given that the precision of the estimate depends on the size of the denominator which varies across service areas, we used hierarchical modeling to categorize the health service areas into three categories (low, medium, high), using a latent variable to determine which health service area belongs to each of the three categories. The cutoffs separating the groups were based on the hierarchical model, taking the precision of the estimated proportion of patients receiving radiation into account. Health service areas with the highest proportions of patients receiving radiation were assigned to the "high" cluster; those with the lowest proportions to the "low" cluster; and those in the between to the "medium" cluster.

  20 Years

Study Arms (2)

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

Data were obtained for women in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) between 1990 and 2011 who had not undergone radiotherapy for DCIS and experienced a subsequent breast cancer or DCIS diagnosis.

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare

Data were obtained for women in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare with a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosis between 1991 and 2009 who had not undergone radiotherapy for DCIS and experienced a subsequent breast cancer or DCIS diagnosis.

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 21 Years+
• Sex: female
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women identified from SEER and SEER-Medicare data with Stage 0-III breast cancer after DCIS who had received BCS without radiation for initial treatment.

This study used data from SEER and SEER-Medicare.

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: lead
• Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: collaborator

Study Sites (4)

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

Dartmouth College

Hanover, New Hampshire, 03755, United States

Location

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States

Location

Related Publications (14)

• Sumner WE 3rd, Koniaris LG, Snell SE, Spector S, Powell J, Avisar E, Moffat F, Livingstone AS, Franceschi D. Results of 23,810 cases of ductal carcinoma-in-situ. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 May;14(5):1638-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9316-1. Epub 2007 Jan 24.

  PMID: 17245612 BACKGROUND

• Kim SY, Han BK, Kim EK, Choi WJ, Choi Y, Kim HH, Moon WK. Breast Cancer Detected at Screening US: Survival Rates and Clinical-Pathologic and Imaging Factors Associated with Recurrence. Radiology. 2017 Aug;284(2):354-364. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162348. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

  PMID: 28387638 BACKGROUND

• EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group; EORTC Radiotherapy Group; Bijker N, Meijnen P, Peterse JL, Bogaerts J, Van Hoorebeeck I, Julien JP, Gennaro M, Rouanet P, Avril A, Fentiman IS, Bartelink H, Rutgers EJ. Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma-in-situ: ten-year results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized phase III trial 10853--a study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 20;24(21):3381-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.1366. Epub 2006 Jun 26.

  PMID: 16801628 BACKGROUND

• Fisher B, Land S, Mamounas E, Dignam J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Prevention of invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: an update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. Semin Oncol. 2001 Aug;28(4):400-18. doi: 10.1016/s0093-7754(01)90133-2.

  PMID: 11498833 BACKGROUND

• Emdin SO, Granstrand B, Ringberg A, Sandelin K, Arnesson LG, Nordgren H, Anderson H, Garmo H, Holmberg L, Wallgren A; Swedish Breast Cancer Group. SweDCIS: Radiotherapy after sector resection for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Results of a randomised trial in a population offered mammography screening. Acta Oncol. 2006;45(5):536-43. doi: 10.1080/02841860600681569.

  PMID: 16864166 BACKGROUND

• Houghton J, George WD, Cuzick J, Duggan C, Fentiman IS, Spittle M; UK Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research; Ductal Carcinoma in situ Working Party; DCIS trialists in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. Radiotherapy and tamoxifen in women with completely excised ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003 Jul 12;362(9378):95-102. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13859-7.

  PMID: 12867108 BACKGROUND

• Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG); Correa C, McGale P, Taylor C, Wang Y, Clarke M, Davies C, Peto R, Bijker N, Solin L, Darby S. Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):162-77. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq039.

  PMID: 20956824 BACKGROUND

• Kaplan CP, Napoles AM, Hwang ES, Bloom J, Stewart S, Nickleach D, Karliner L. Selection of treatment among Latina and non-Latina white women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Feb;20(2):215-23. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.1986. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

  PMID: 21128819 BACKGROUND

• Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Costantino J, Poller W, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Deutsch M, Margolese R, Dimitrov N, Kavanah M. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Feb;16(2):441-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.441.

  PMID: 9469327 BACKGROUND

• Fong J, Kurniawan ED, Rose AK, Mou A, Collins JP, Miller JA, Mann GB. Outcomes of screening-detected ductal carcinoma in situ treated with wide excision alone. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18(13):3778-84. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1748-6. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

  PMID: 21630124 BACKGROUND

• Wong JS, Kaelin CM, Troyan SL, Gadd MA, Gelman R, Lester SC, Schnitt SJ, Sgroi DC, Silver BJ, Harris JR, Smith BL. Prospective study of wide excision alone for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar 1;24(7):1031-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.9975. Epub 2006 Feb 6.

  PMID: 16461781 BACKGROUND

• Pickle LW, MungioleM, Jones GK, White AA. Atlas of United States Mortality. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; December 1996. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/atlasmet.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2015.

  BACKGROUND

• Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Skinner JS. Geography and the debate over Medicare reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W96-114. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w2.96.

  PMID: 12703563 BACKGROUND

• Jagsi R, Abrahamse P, Hawley ST, Graff JJ, Hamilton AS, Katz SJ. Underascertainment of radiotherapy receipt in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data. Cancer. 2012 Jan 15;118(2):333-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26295. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

  PMID: 21717446 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating; Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Adenocarcinoma; Carcinoma; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Breast Carcinoma In Situ; Carcinoma in Situ; Neoplasms, Ductal, Lobular, and Medullary

Limitations and Caveats

No data set can capture all of the complexity surrounding surgical decision making at the time of a second diagnosis. We did not have information about patient preferences or the clinical characteristics about second breast event.

Results Point of Contact

• Title: Rinaa Punglia, MD
• Organization: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

rinaa_punglia@dfci.harvard.edu

617-582-8759

Study Officials

• Rinaa S. Punglia, MD, MPH

  Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

• PI is Sponsor Employee: No
• Restrictive Agreement: No

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: OTHER
• Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 23, 2014
• First Posted: September 25, 2014
• Study Start: August 1, 2013
• Primary Completion: January 1, 2017
• Study Completion: January 1, 2017
• Last Updated: September 6, 2019
• Results First Posted: September 6, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

US (4)