Alcon® Ex-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device in Japanese Patients
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of the EX-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma
2 other identifiers
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the Alcon Ex-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device (Ex-PRESS) in Japanese subjects with normal tension glaucoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 26, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 24, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 24, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 20, 2018
CompletedJuly 20, 2018
July 1, 2018
2.7 years
September 18, 2014
September 27, 2017
July 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Change From Baseline in IOP
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Percent Change From Baseline in IOP
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Percentage of Eyes With IOP Lowering Rate of 20% or More From Baseline up to Month 12
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Percentage of Eyes Receiving Drug Therapy for Glaucoma Necessary to Maintain the IOP
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). For some subjects, both left and right eyes were targeted for the study, and data from both eyes were analyzed for this safety endpoint, as specified in the protocol.
Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Percentage of Eyes Receiving Secondary Surgical Treatment (Including Laser Therapy) Necessary to Maintain the IOP
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Secondary surgical treatment included needling, laser suture lysis, and conjunctival and scleral flap sutures. For some subjects, both left and right eyes were targeted for the study, and data from both eyes were analyzed for this safety endpoint, as specified in the protocol. An eye may have received more than one procedure.
Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative
Study Arms (1)
Ex-PRESS
EXPERIMENTALEx-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device, Model P50PL, implanted in the anterior chamber of the study eye during glaucoma surgery intended for the lifetime of the patient
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of normal tension glaucoma.
- Indicated for filtration surgery using Ex-PRESS®.
- Understand and provide Informed Consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to be pregnant during the study period.
- Diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma or secondary glaucoma.
- History of glaucoma surgery.
- Ophthalmologic surgery within the past 6 months.
- Difficulty with applanation tonometry measurement.
- Corneal dystrophy.
- Infectious/non-infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, or uveitis in either eye.
- Severe blepharitis or dry eye.
- History of metal allergy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alcon Researchlead
Study Sites (1)
Contact Alcon Japan, Ltd for Trial Locations
Tokyo, 107-0052, Japan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study was a single-arm study with filtration surgery using EX-PRESS®. Although target sample size was 45 patients, only 32 patients (37 eyes) were enrolled due to a small number of patients meeting eligibility criteria of the study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Associate, Medical Group 1, Japan
- Organization
- Alcon, A Novartis Division
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alcon, A Novartis Division
Alcon Japan, Ltd.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2014
First Posted
September 23, 2014
Study Start
February 26, 2014
Primary Completion
October 24, 2016
Study Completion
October 24, 2016
Last Updated
July 20, 2018
Results First Posted
July 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07