NCT02246777

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the Alcon Ex-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device (Ex-PRESS) in Japanese subjects with normal tension glaucoma.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 26, 2014

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 18, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 23, 2014

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 24, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 24, 2016

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 20, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

September 18, 2014

Results QC Date

September 27, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 12, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Glaucoma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative

  • Change From Baseline in IOP

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative

  • Percent Change From Baseline in IOP

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative

  • Percentage of Eyes With IOP Lowering Rate of 20% or More From Baseline up to Month 12

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Pre-Operative), Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative

  • Percentage of Eyes Receiving Drug Therapy for Glaucoma Necessary to Maintain the IOP

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). For some subjects, both left and right eyes were targeted for the study, and data from both eyes were analyzed for this safety endpoint, as specified in the protocol.

    Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative

  • Percentage of Eyes Receiving Secondary Surgical Treatment (Including Laser Therapy) Necessary to Maintain the IOP

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Secondary surgical treatment included needling, laser suture lysis, and conjunctival and scleral flap sutures. For some subjects, both left and right eyes were targeted for the study, and data from both eyes were analyzed for this safety endpoint, as specified in the protocol. An eye may have received more than one procedure.

    Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Post-Operative

Study Arms (1)

Ex-PRESS

EXPERIMENTAL

Ex-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device, Model P50PL, implanted in the anterior chamber of the study eye during glaucoma surgery intended for the lifetime of the patient

Device: Ex-PRESS® Glaucoma Filtration Device, Model P50PL

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of normal tension glaucoma.
  • Indicated for filtration surgery using Ex-PRESS®.
  • Understand and provide Informed Consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to be pregnant during the study period.
  • Diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma or secondary glaucoma.
  • History of glaucoma surgery.
  • Ophthalmologic surgery within the past 6 months.
  • Difficulty with applanation tonometry measurement.
  • Corneal dystrophy.
  • Infectious/non-infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, or uveitis in either eye.
  • Severe blepharitis or dry eye.
  • History of metal allergy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Contact Alcon Japan, Ltd for Trial Locations

Tokyo, 107-0052, Japan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular HypertensionEye Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

This study was a single-arm study with filtration surgery using EX-PRESS®. Although target sample size was 45 patients, only 32 patients (37 eyes) were enrolled due to a small number of patients meeting eligibility criteria of the study.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Associate, Medical Group 1, Japan
Organization
Alcon, A Novartis Division

Study Officials

  • Alcon, A Novartis Division

    Alcon Japan, Ltd.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2014

First Posted

September 23, 2014

Study Start

February 26, 2014

Primary Completion

October 24, 2016

Study Completion

October 24, 2016

Last Updated

July 20, 2018

Results First Posted

July 20, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07

Locations