NCT02238067

Brief Summary

This study is a prospective, non-interventional, cross-sectional multicenter survey. The aim is to better understand the current therapy pattern for anemia in CKD treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and not on-dialysis participant population in Israel. Participating physicians will be requested to interview eligible participants with CKD not on dialysis and to complete for them a satisfaction survey for anemia treatment. The survey will be completed twice, once at study start and once at six months' follow-up.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
196

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

7 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2011

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2013

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 10, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 12, 2014

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 7, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

September 10, 2014

Results QC Date

September 16, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 21, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Percentage of Participants by ESA Types at Baseline

    Assessment was performed by physician via a satisfaction survey on anemia treatment. ESA types included: Mircera, Recormon, Eprex, and Aranesp. Percentage of participants with each ESA type was reported.

    Baseline

  • Percentage of Participants by ESA Types at Month 6

    Assessment was performed by physician via a satisfaction survey on anemia treatment. ESA types included: Mircera, Recormon, Eprex, and Aranesp. Percentage of participants with each ESA type was reported.

    Month 6

  • Percentage of Participants by Frequency of ESA Use at Baseline

    Assessment was performed by physician via a satisfaction survey on anemia treatment. Frequency of ESA use included:Three times a week, twice a week, once a week, every 2 weeks, every 4 weeks or other (any other frequency). Percentage of participants by each frequency of ESA use was reported.

    Baseline

  • Percentage of Participants by Frequency of ESA Use at Month 6

    Assessment was performed by physician via a satisfaction survey on anemia treatment. Frequency of ESA use included:Three times a week, twice a week, once a week, every 2 weeks, every 4 weeks or other (any other frequency). Percentage of participants by each frequency of ESA use was reported.

    Month 6

  • Percentage of Participants by Frequency and Types of ESA Used at Baseline

    Assessment was performed by physician via a satisfaction survey on anemia treatment. Frequency of ESA use included:Three times a week, twice a week, once a week, every 2 weeks, every 4 weeks or other (any other frequency). ESA types included: Mircera, Recormon, Eprex, and Aranesp. Percentage of participants with each ESA type and each frequency of ESA use was reported.

    Baseline

  • Percentage of Participants by Frequency and Types of ESA Used at Month 6

    Assessment was performed by physician via a satisfaction survey on anemia treatment. Frequency of ESA use included:Three times a week, twice a week, once a week, every 2 weeks, every 4 weeks or other (any other frequency). ESA types included: Mircera, Recormon, Eprex, and Aranesp. Percentage of participants with each ESA type and each frequency of ESA use was reported.

    Month 6

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Percentage of Participants by Different CKD Stages

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Percentage of Participants by Different Injection Administration Modes

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Percentage of Participants With Interest in Learning to Inject Independently

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Percentage of Participants by Need for Improvement in Treatment Frequency

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Percentage of Participants by Need for Improvement in Treatment Frequency by ESA Type

    Baseline, Month 6

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Chronic Renal Anemia Participants

Participants with CKD who are not on dialysis and treated with ESA according to the usual standard of care and best practice guidelines, will be interviewed by physician who will complete the satisfaction surveys on anemia treatment at baseline and at 6 months follow-up visit.

Drug: ESAOther: Satisfaction Survey Questionnaire

Interventions

ESADRUG

Participants will continue to receive their ESA treatment, as per physician's discretion. The study protocol does not specify any particular ESA drug.

Chronic Renal Anemia Participants

Each participant will be interviewed to complete treatment satisfaction questionnaire survey at baseline and at 6-month follow-up visit.

Chronic Renal Anemia Participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult participants with CKD not on-dialysis treated with ESAs

You may qualify if:

  • Adult participants with CKD Stage 3-5
  • Treated with ESAs
  • Participant is speaking the same language as the investigator interviewer

You may not qualify if:

  • Past or current treatment with dialysis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

Clalit- New Savyon Clinic

Ganey Tikva, Israel

Location

Clalit - Diabetic HaMoshava South Clinic

Jerusalem, Israel

Location

Clalit Carmiel

Karmiel, Israel

Location

Clalit - Professional Clinic, Zvulun

Kiryat Bialik, Israel

Location

Clalit Ben-Gurion

Naẕerat ‘Illit, Israel

Location

Kaplan Medical Center; Nephrology and Hypertension Services

Rehovot, 76100, Israel

Location

Clalit- Migdal HaMea Clinic, Tel Aviv

Tel Aviv, Israel

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

The study was completed as defined in the protocol. Only 196 participants (out of planned 400) were enrolled due to slow recruitment during the study period.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Communications
Organization
Hoffmann-La Roche

Study Officials

  • Clinical Trials

    Hoffmann-La Roche

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2014

First Posted

September 12, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion

August 1, 2013

Study Completion

August 1, 2013

Last Updated

March 24, 2017

Results First Posted

November 7, 2016

Record last verified: 2017-02

Locations