NCT02228993

Brief Summary

Awake craniotomy (AC) is an anesthetic and surgical technique commonly used to resect tumors involving or adjacent to the eloquent or motor cortices, those portions of the brain that are responsible for language and motor skills, respectively. By mapping those areas of the brain that are necessary for such functions, the neurosurgeon is able to avoid resection of cortical tissue that might compromise the patient's abilities to speak or move, hence preserving neurologic function. AC is often accomplished by direct cortical stimulation or inhibition, while maintaining the patient's ability to interact with the operative team. The anesthetic technique often involves a regional (scalp) block combined with intraoperative intravenous mild sedation. In some reported instances of AC, no cortical mapping is performed, and the technique is performed solely because it is thought that AC leads to a better recovery profile (less pain, better neurologic outcome, and shorter hospital stay) than craniotomy performed under general anesthesia. The Quality of Recovery Score (QoR-40) is a validated, multi-parameter instrument that has been used in various postoperative populations to assess the overall satisfaction and well-being of patients having undergone anesthesia and surgery. Leslie et al. have reported that the QoR-40 is a valid tool in assessing neurosurgical patients, but a direct comparison between AC patients and general anesthesia craniotomy (GAC) patients using this tool has never been performed. AC may also be associated with better 30 and 90 day multi-parameter outcomes than GAC. The well-validated Acute Short Form (SF-12) health survey, an abbreviated version of the SF-36, consists of 12 items. It measures two domains, including mental and physical component summaries (mental component summary and physical composite score, respectively). Hypothesis: Awake craniotomy for tumor resection is associated with a better multi-parameter quality of recovery in the immediate postoperative period, and better 30 and 90 day quality of life outcomes, than craniotomy performed under general anesthesia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2014

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2014

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 29, 2014

Completed
6.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 8, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6.8 years

First QC Date

August 27, 2014

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) score

    24 hours postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Awake Craniotomy

General Anesthesia Craniotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult non-pregnant patients (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing Awake Craniotomy or General Anesthesia Craniotomy for elective supratentorial tumor resection.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult non-pregnant patients (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing AC or GAC for elective supratentorial tumor resection.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients under 18 years of age, non-English speaking, pregnancy, unable to obtain written informed consent, infratentorial tumors.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Wrede KH, Stieglitz LH, Fiferna A, Karst M, Gerganov VM, Samii M, von Gosseln HH, Ludemann WO. Patient acceptance of awake craniotomy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;113(10):880-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

    PMID: 21782320BACKGROUND
  • Serletis D, Bernstein M. Prospective study of awake craniotomy used routinely and nonselectively for supratentorial tumors. J Neurosurg. 2007 Jul;107(1):1-6. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/07/0001.

    PMID: 17639865BACKGROUND
  • Manninen PH, Balki M, Lukitto K, Bernstein M. Patient satisfaction with awake craniotomy for tumor surgery: a comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in conjunction with propofol. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):237-42. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000181287.86811.5C.

    PMID: 16368836BACKGROUND
  • Whittle IR, Midgley S, Georges H, Pringle AM, Taylor R. Patient perceptions of "awake" brain tumour surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Mar;147(3):275-7; discussion 277. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0445-7.

    PMID: 15627921BACKGROUND
  • Khu KJ, Doglietto F, Radovanovic I, Taleb F, Mendelsohn D, Zadeh G, Bernstein M. Patients' perceptions of awake and outpatient craniotomy for brain tumor: a qualitative study. J Neurosurg. 2010 May;112(5):1056-60. doi: 10.3171/2009.6.JNS09716.

    PMID: 19612973BACKGROUND
  • Manninen PH, Tan TK. Postoperative nausea and vomiting after craniotomy for tumor surgery: a comparison between awake craniotomy and general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2002 Jun;14(4):279-83. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00354-9.

    PMID: 12088812BACKGROUND
  • Leslie K, Troedel S, Irwin K, Pearce F, Ugoni A, Gillies R, Pemberton E, Dharmage S. Quality of recovery from anesthesia in neurosurgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2003 Nov;99(5):1158-65. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200311000-00024.

    PMID: 14576554BACKGROUND
  • Moerman N, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Oosting H. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):445-51. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00002.

    PMID: 8623940BACKGROUND
  • Perks A, Chakravarti S, Manninen P. Preoperative anxiety in neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009 Apr;21(2):127-30. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31819a6ca3.

    PMID: 19295391BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsNervous System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology & Neurological Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2014

First Posted

August 29, 2014

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion

June 1, 2021

Study Completion

June 1, 2021

Last Updated

October 8, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Locations