Quality of Recovery Awake Versus Asleep Craniotomy
Quality of Recovery Following Awake Craniotomy Versus Craniotomy Performed Under General Anesthesia
1 other identifier
observational
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Awake craniotomy (AC) is an anesthetic and surgical technique commonly used to resect tumors involving or adjacent to the eloquent or motor cortices, those portions of the brain that are responsible for language and motor skills, respectively. By mapping those areas of the brain that are necessary for such functions, the neurosurgeon is able to avoid resection of cortical tissue that might compromise the patient's abilities to speak or move, hence preserving neurologic function. AC is often accomplished by direct cortical stimulation or inhibition, while maintaining the patient's ability to interact with the operative team. The anesthetic technique often involves a regional (scalp) block combined with intraoperative intravenous mild sedation. In some reported instances of AC, no cortical mapping is performed, and the technique is performed solely because it is thought that AC leads to a better recovery profile (less pain, better neurologic outcome, and shorter hospital stay) than craniotomy performed under general anesthesia. The Quality of Recovery Score (QoR-40) is a validated, multi-parameter instrument that has been used in various postoperative populations to assess the overall satisfaction and well-being of patients having undergone anesthesia and surgery. Leslie et al. have reported that the QoR-40 is a valid tool in assessing neurosurgical patients, but a direct comparison between AC patients and general anesthesia craniotomy (GAC) patients using this tool has never been performed. AC may also be associated with better 30 and 90 day multi-parameter outcomes than GAC. The well-validated Acute Short Form (SF-12) health survey, an abbreviated version of the SF-36, consists of 12 items. It measures two domains, including mental and physical component summaries (mental component summary and physical composite score, respectively). Hypothesis: Awake craniotomy for tumor resection is associated with a better multi-parameter quality of recovery in the immediate postoperative period, and better 30 and 90 day quality of life outcomes, than craniotomy performed under general anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2014
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2021
CompletedOctober 8, 2021
September 1, 2021
6.8 years
August 27, 2014
September 30, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) score
24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Awake Craniotomy
General Anesthesia Craniotomy
Eligibility Criteria
Adult non-pregnant patients (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing Awake Craniotomy or General Anesthesia Craniotomy for elective supratentorial tumor resection.
You may qualify if:
- Adult non-pregnant patients (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing AC or GAC for elective supratentorial tumor resection.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under 18 years of age, non-English speaking, pregnancy, unable to obtain written informed consent, infratentorial tumors.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (9)
Wrede KH, Stieglitz LH, Fiferna A, Karst M, Gerganov VM, Samii M, von Gosseln HH, Ludemann WO. Patient acceptance of awake craniotomy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;113(10):880-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
PMID: 21782320BACKGROUNDSerletis D, Bernstein M. Prospective study of awake craniotomy used routinely and nonselectively for supratentorial tumors. J Neurosurg. 2007 Jul;107(1):1-6. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/07/0001.
PMID: 17639865BACKGROUNDManninen PH, Balki M, Lukitto K, Bernstein M. Patient satisfaction with awake craniotomy for tumor surgery: a comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in conjunction with propofol. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):237-42. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000181287.86811.5C.
PMID: 16368836BACKGROUNDWhittle IR, Midgley S, Georges H, Pringle AM, Taylor R. Patient perceptions of "awake" brain tumour surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Mar;147(3):275-7; discussion 277. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0445-7.
PMID: 15627921BACKGROUNDKhu KJ, Doglietto F, Radovanovic I, Taleb F, Mendelsohn D, Zadeh G, Bernstein M. Patients' perceptions of awake and outpatient craniotomy for brain tumor: a qualitative study. J Neurosurg. 2010 May;112(5):1056-60. doi: 10.3171/2009.6.JNS09716.
PMID: 19612973BACKGROUNDManninen PH, Tan TK. Postoperative nausea and vomiting after craniotomy for tumor surgery: a comparison between awake craniotomy and general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2002 Jun;14(4):279-83. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00354-9.
PMID: 12088812BACKGROUNDLeslie K, Troedel S, Irwin K, Pearce F, Ugoni A, Gillies R, Pemberton E, Dharmage S. Quality of recovery from anesthesia in neurosurgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2003 Nov;99(5):1158-65. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200311000-00024.
PMID: 14576554BACKGROUNDMoerman N, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Oosting H. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):445-51. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00002.
PMID: 8623940BACKGROUNDPerks A, Chakravarti S, Manninen P. Preoperative anxiety in neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009 Apr;21(2):127-30. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31819a6ca3.
PMID: 19295391BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Anesthesiology & Neurological Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2014
First Posted
August 29, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2021
Study Completion
June 1, 2021
Last Updated
October 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09